Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Adam Haskell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is going way off topic from the original thread but still pertinent to cf-talk, licenses and how licenses work is an important thing for anyone using or producing software. I'd assume many folks on this list are

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 6:32 AM, Adam Haskell wrote: I won't say yes or no one way or another on the legality or really even the morality but I will say this puts you in a compromising position for submitting work to any open source CFML engine. We've already had the discussion surrounding

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

This is going way off topic from the original thread but still pertinent to cf-talk, licenses and how licenses work is an important thing for anyone using or producing software. I'd assume many folks on this list are producing software, Mike D can always correct me and push me to another HoF list

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

It is. Section 2.7.1 of the CF8 EULA clearly prohibits any decompiling. On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:58 PM, Brad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I had gotten it in my head that it was illegal to decompile a closed-source program like Adobe ColdFusion -- mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 12:58 AM, Brad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sounds very cool. I am one of those digging types -- dare I admit it. Don't admit it! Whatever you do! But don't deny it either! Plead the 5th. =] To be clear, I wasn't advocating doing anything illegal or immoral. Of

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

Sounds very cool. I am one of those digging types -- dare I admit it. I had gotten it in my head that it was illegal to decompile a closed-source program like Adobe ColdFusion so I have never tried it before. I'm sure somone would gladly corect me if I am wrong. ~Brad JADclipse, a plugin

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

I won't say yes or no one way or another on the legality or really even the morality but I will say this puts you in a compromising position for submitting work to any open source CFML engine. We've already had the discussion surrounding certain comments coming from the CF community about viewing

RE: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

Thanks Adam. That right there is enough reason for me to never bother trying. :) ~Brad -Original Message- From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 7:32 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean. I won't say yes or no one way or another

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

Hexadecimal :) Adam Haskell On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Fred Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have run into an issue with cold fusion, When I try to concatenate the string '0F' ' ' I get a value that passes isBoolean(). While this works with any number of leading zeros it does

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

True, but 0A is also hex and it still returns false for isBoolean. On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:13 PM, Adam Haskell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hexadecimal :) Adam Haskell On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:00 PM, Fred Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have run into an issue with cold fusion,

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

A more simplified example would be: cfoutput #isBoolean(0F )# /cfoutput Additionally '0D' has the same effect. Fred I have run into an issue with cold fusion, When I try to concatenate the string '0F' ' ' I get a value that passes isBoolean(). While this works with any number of leading

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

I just tried this with Blue Dragon JX and I get the desired results. http://labs.trunkful.com/isitBoolean.cfm Also, I check other hex values and found that 0D also comes back as a boolean. ALso if you just have the string 0F ( that is Zero Ef Space) you get true for boolean. Odd.

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

0A is a line feed (pretty sure on this) which is certainly not boolean. I have no idea what 0F is though I thought it had some significance like terminator or something. Adam Haskell On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:20 PM, Brian Kotek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: True, but 0A is also hex and it still

RE: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

take long enough to catch in the stack trace. Maybe some regex is being used to get out yes, no, true, false, and... ?? ~Brad -Original Message- From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 4:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean. 0A

RE: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

-Original Message- From: Fred Anderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:31 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean. A more simplified example would be: cfoutput #isBoolean(0F )# /cfoutput Additionally '0D' has the same effect. I think you

RE: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

-Original Message- From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean. 0A is a line feed (pretty sure on this) which is certainly not boolean. I have no idea what 0F is though I thought it had some

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

Good point. on both accounts :-P Adam Haskell On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -Original Message- From: Adam Haskell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:34 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean. 0A

RE: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

: 1259 [local variables unavailable] CfJspPage.internalIsBoolean(Object) line: 712 Double.isInfinite(double) line: 506 ~Brad -Original Message- From: Brad Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF thinks 0F is boolean. Man, I

Re: CF thinks 0F is boolean.

On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 6:16 PM, Brad Wood [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Definitely no regex-- mostly attempts to parse as a double etc, and some string manipulation. I can watch the variables as they go by, but I obviously can't see the actual Java code with the exception of when it dips