Re: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCORRRRN!!

2004-12-12 Thread Mike Kear
Regarding the relative costs of the expensive ColdFusion and the free other technologies, I have a statement from a colleague in another organisation, which I'll be posting separately. I told him about a site I'd just about finished in ColdFusion and he told me he was amazed. That I'd done my

RE: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCORRRRN!!

2004-12-12 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
I think you're a bit off... I could be wrong, but it's been my impression that when a thread finishes processing, it delivers any undelivered content from the buffer immediately and then grabs up the next incoming http request. So nobody's actually waiting for someone else's thread to finsih,

RE: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCORRRRN!!

2004-12-12 Thread Jim Davis
-Original Message- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 11:33 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCON!! I think you're a bit off... I think that the original poster might be confusing two separate things here

Re: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCORRRRN!!

2004-12-12 Thread Sean Corfield
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004 01:02:18 -0500, Jim Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm not sure how this will be implemented in BlackStone - Isaac's post was the first I'd heard of it. But it is doable in Java (of course) and it wouldn't be all that hard to create a CFC to kick something like this off in

RE: CF vs ASP.NET! GET YOUR FRESH POPCORRRRN!!

2004-12-12 Thread Roger B.
ASP.NET is taking market away from CF! I doubt you can substantiate that. CF's market share appears to have shrunk from the old 2.0 and 3.0 days, but there's been a lot more going on than ASP.NET. In fact, ASP.NET is a minor blip on CF's radar when compared to the giant swarm of open-source

<    1   2