RE: CFPOP - murphy's law

2001-01-22 Thread Owen Leonard
> UIDL assigns each mail a unique sequence of alphanumerics (such as: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]) that never changes. Thanks for the great explanation. Even knowing (at least vaguely) how UIDL's work, I'm still in the dark about how one would take advantage of them with CFPOP. Wouldn't CFPOP need to b

RE: CFPOP - murphy's law

2001-01-21 Thread lsellers
> That was about as far as we got in our investigation. And of course > we're checking into an update for Sendmail. The question is, if it's > optional, how do you get CFPOP to not send the command? Good question, but I don't know the answer. > And where's the documentation for this feature an

RE: CFPOP - murphy's law

2001-01-21 Thread Owen Leonard
> > (from CF 4.5 Pro to 4.5.1 SP2) we started having problems with CFPOP > > accessing mail on a machine running SCO-UNIX and Sendmail. > > It's an "optional" pop3 command to get unique id numbers for all the > messages currently on the mail server (to make it easier to > keep track of > what's w

RE: CFPOP - murphy's law

2001-01-20 Thread lsellers
> The upgrade didn't make things better for us. As soon as we upgraded > (from CF 4.5 Pro to 4.5.1 SP2) we started having problems with CFPOP > accessing mail on a machine running SCO-UNIX and Sendmail. It's very > weird--intermittent for some users and consistent with others. > > This is the

RE: CFPOP - murphy's law

2001-01-20 Thread Owen Leonard
The upgrade didn't make things better for us. As soon as we upgraded (from CF 4.5 Pro to 4.5.1 SP2) we started having problems with CFPOP accessing mail on a machine running SCO-UNIX and Sendmail. It's very weird--intermittent for some users and consistent with others. This is the message we're