it certainly helpsthanks for the infoalthough
I am sure there will be a flood of opinions on this, so that's
really why I started the thread
should any of us who don't already know, bother learning that way of
coding for cf?
..tony
Tony Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System
, November 12, 2002 4:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
it certainly helpsthanks for the infoalthough
I am sure there will be a flood of opinions on this, so that's really
why I started the thread
should any of us who don't already know, bother learning
. :-)
--Ben Doom
Programmer General Lackey
Moonbow Software
: -Original Message-
: From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony;navtrak.net]
: Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:29 PM
: To: CF-Talk
: Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
:
:
: it certainly helpsthanks for the info
can think of.
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:tony;navtrak.net]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 1:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
it certainly helpsthanks for the infoalthough
I am sure there will be a flood of opinions
]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
I would tend to argue that you should at least know the basics so that
you
can create quick UDFs for things you do often -- that's saved me hours
and
hours of coding time.
They are easy
Weeg
Senior Web Developer
Information System Design
Navtrak, Inc.
Fleet Management Solutions
www.navtrak.net
410.548.2337
-Original Message-
From: Rob Rohan [mailto:rob;cardinalweb.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2002 4:43 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript
[mailto:tony;navtrak.net]
Sent: Wednesday, 13 November 2002 10:53 a.m.
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
but isnt an included file,
with some reusable code in it
just as fast as a UDF? I guess maybe the only
reason not would be the time to access the file
, 2002 4:53 PM
: To: CF-Talk
: Subject: RE: cfscript performance (was cfscript book)
:
:
: but isnt an included file,
: with some reusable code in it
: just as fast as a UDF? I guess maybe the only
: reason not would be the time to access the file
: referenced in the cfinclude tagright
the bear; some days the bear eats you.
-Original Message-
From: Alex [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 19:18
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [CFSCRIPT performance]
i think cfscript is faster and less
I've done multiple else if() statements within cfscript many times. No
problems at all.
OK, so maybe I shouldn't just trust the books - since it didn't mention
being able to have multiple else if()s, I had avoided them
Code re-write time, methinks g
Philip Arnold
Director
Certified
I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is
quicker to use
CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewise quicker to use the
CFSCRIPT if()
over CFIF? I have a CFIF checking that one of 14 empressions are met (13
ORs). Would it be better to use CFSCRIPT for this?
This is
There is too an else if. Just do else if(). Use it all over the place. Never
had a problem.
Bob Everland
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 11:07 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFSCRIPT performance
I have a question
There is too an else if. Just do else if(). Use it all over the
place. Never had a problem.
How come the docs say you can only do else and place the if inside the
else...
I've done else if() before - as it's actually else { if() }
I'll have to check with multiple else if()s
Philip Arnold
There is too an else if. Just do else if(). Use it all over the
place. Never had a problem.
How come the docs say you can only do else and place the if inside
the else...
I've done else if() before - as it's actually else { if() }
I'll have to check with multiple else if()s
I
I've done multiple else if() statements within cfscript many times. No
problems at all.
Evan
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 12:26 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFSCRIPT performance
There is too an else
nold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 27, 2001 11:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CFSCRIPT performance
I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is
quicker to use
CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewise quicker to use the
CFSCRIPT if()
over CFIF? I have a CFI
i think cfscript is faster and less intensive in bigger blocks.
"Russel Madere" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is quicker to use
CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewise quicker to use the CFSCRIPT if()
over CFIF? I have a CFIF
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: [CFSCRIPT performance]
i think cfscript is faster and less intensive in bigger blocks.
"Russel Madere" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
I have a question on CFSCRIPT performance. I know that it is quicker to use
CFSCRIPT than to use CFSET. Is it likewise quic
18 matches
Mail list logo
