Re: Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2

2004-01-05 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Tuesday 23 Dec 2003 13:47 pm, Samuel R. Neff wrote: Interesting that there was no mention of the Active Content/Eolas issue;I guess that change isn't in this update.Anyone have more details/confirmation? Stil awaiting the outcome of the patent being re-examined in light of prior art that

RE: Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2

2003-12-23 Thread John Beynon
I thought it was going to be bad, but I've been using the sp2 since yesterday and it's not that bad, my on going reports can be found on my blog @ http://www.beynon.org.uk/blog Jb. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 December 2003 22:36 To:

RE: Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2

2003-12-23 Thread Samuel R. Neff
--- -Original Message- From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 3:50 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 I thought it was going to be bad, but I've been

RE: Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2

2003-12-23 Thread John Beynon
--- -Original Message- From: John Beynon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 23, 2003 3:50 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2 I thought it was going to be bad, but I've