Re: Com and CFMX

2003-03-13 Thread Lewis Sellers
>Btw. Didn't you get the memo from MM that said 'COM was dead'? j/k I thought the memo said CF was dead? /-> --min ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com

RE: Com and CFMX

2003-03-13 Thread Robert Bailey
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 11:01 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Com and CFMX Robert, I feel your pain. Although is a huge pain in the arse, I found that by creating wrappers in .NET for the COM object I wanted to use, I was able to get them working properly in CF. I've also

RE: Com and CFMX

2003-03-13 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
ailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 13, 2003 8:28 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Com and CFMX Yeah, I gave up trying to get it to work. Guess I am moving over to ASP for this part of the application. Thanks! Robert Bailey Famous for nothing -Original Message- From: Frank M

RE: Com and CFMX

2003-03-13 Thread Robert Bailey
]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:51 PM Subject: RE: Com and CFMX > even the updater did not help the server, ugh > > Thanks! > Robert Bailey > Famous for nothing > > > -Original Message- > From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed

Re: Com and CFMX

2003-03-12 Thread Frank Mamone
t; Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:51 PM Subject: RE: Com and CFMX > even the updater did not help the server, ugh > > Thanks! > Robert Bailey > Famous for nothing > > > -Original Message- > From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wed

RE: Com and CFMX

2003-03-12 Thread Robert Bailey
even the updater did not help the server, ugh Thanks! Robert Bailey Famous for nothing -Original Message- From: Frank Mamone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:54 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Com and CFMX Updater 2 fixed alot of issues but there's still on

Re: Com and CFMX

2003-03-12 Thread Frank Mamone
sage - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:39 PM Subject: RE: Com and CFMX > there is info on this in the known issues lists at macromedia.com > > D > > >-Original Message- > >Fro

Re: Com and CFMX

2003-03-12 Thread jon hall
I can say the same for msxml...seems to work pretty good now. -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wednesday, March 12, 2003, 3:37:21 PM, you wrote: JG> Have you applied updater 2 to your CFMX installation? It fixed several JG> issues with accessing COM objects. JG> I've been able to instatiate Wo

RE: Com and CFMX

2003-03-12 Thread Douglas.Knudsen
there is info on this in the known issues lists at macromedia.com D >-Original Message- >From: Robert Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:12 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Com and CFMX > > >So running the same scripts under CFMX and CF5 server, they do not work

Re: Com and CFMX

2003-03-12 Thread Jeff Garza
Have you applied updater 2 to your CFMX installation? It fixed several issues with accessing COM objects. I've been able to instatiate Word on the server and manipulate the text under CFMX. But it definately didn't work prior to Updater 2. HTH, Jeff Garza - Original Message - From: "Ro