RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-06-01 Thread Chris Norloff
"Never" is too strong a word. If you have a CFOUTPUT at the top of the page and another CFOUTPUT at the bottom of the page, it's not better to enclose the entire page in one CFOUTPUT tag as you're suggesting. Extraneous code, no. Extra code, yes - if it improves performance, reliability, or

Re: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-06-01 Thread G
small that it was not worthy of making a fuss over. Brian - Original Message - From: "Bill Killillay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 3:35 PM Subject: RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT > Since when is CFLOOP &quo

Re: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-31 Thread Bill Davidson
lillay" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 4:35 PM Subject: RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT > Since when is CFLOOP "faster" then CFOUTPUT? I have seen on this list many, > many times that CFLOOP is one of the slow

RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-31 Thread J Winter
Thanks, Josh -Original Message- From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT > Hi, I've always been curious about this. What is the correct way? Does it > matter? > Is ther

RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-31 Thread Bill Killillay
OUTPUT and CFLOOP, I say that CFOUTPUT with a query attribute beats CFLOOP hands down every day... -Original Message- From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 2:00 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT > Hi, I've always been

RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-31 Thread Philip Arnold - ASP
> Hi, I've always been curious about this. What is the correct way? Does it > matter? > Is there an unwritten rule; if there are more than 4 (or ?) vars in a page > Listing 1 is a good way to do it else Listing 2 is recommended? > I'm assuming when using Listing 1 would > always be applicable.

RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-29 Thread Mark Warrick
You should never add extraeneous code into your templates, therefore Listing 1 would be the better candidate. ---mark Mark Warrick - Fusioneers.com Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone: 714-547-5386 http://www.fusioneers.com http://www.warrick.net =

RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-29 Thread J Winter
would the pros do in this situation? Josh -Original Message- From: Katherine Maltby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2001 10:00 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT It depends how you want the results to be displayed, but I'd recommend putting the

RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-29 Thread Katherine Maltby
It depends how you want the results to be displayed, but I'd recommend putting the cfoutput tags inside the table before the as otherwise you'll open a new table for each line of results, which isn't good if you're pulling rows and rows back from a database. Kath Web Production Director --

RE: Correctly using CFOUTPUT

2001-05-29 Thread Scott Wolf
I personally have a tendency to use Listing 1's format more often than I use the one in Listing 2. The only difference is that I put in my table tags BEFORE my CFOUTPUT tags, that way if I'm looping through a query's results, I don't have a new table being created for each record. :) Scott Wolf