Huh? FCKEditor has a spell checker, and has had it for some time.
Its listed right on the feature set on the front page. Its a
3rd-party plugin, but it works quite well.
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:47:02 -0500, Douglas Knudsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what was your answer to 'I can not spell woth
Matt Robertson wrote:
Huh? FCKEditor has a spell checker, and has had it for some time.
Its listed right on the feature set on the front page. Its a
3rd-party plugin, but it works quite well.
Well, it wasn't in the 2.0 beta releases, RC1, or RC2... they didn't add
it back in until RC3.
I'm not referring to the 'betas' of FCKEditor (the author means well
but seems to have reinvented development cycle terminology). I'm
staying away from it until its final. I'm referencing v1.6. I
replaced ActivEdit with FCKEditor 1.6 some time ago. The file upload
capability was
yeah, version 1 had a hook to use iSpell which is great for
individuals, but the license required a purchase for use enterprise
wide and iSpell required a client side install, something of a real
PITA to get approved for an intranet of 20,000 employees. Activedit
was therefore a cheaper route in
yeah, version 1 had a hook to use iSpell which is great for
individuals, but the license required a purchase for use enterprise
wide and iSpell required a client side install, something of a real
PITA to get approved for an intranet of 20,000 employees. Activedit
was therefore a cheaper route in
Will wrote:
Ya know...the more I think about it, the LESS I want my client handling
images...
They have enough trouble with simple text formatting! Anyone with me here??
Oh HELL no! :D
I have clients who got down on their knees and thanked me whenI
replaced the commercial editor I was
what was your answer to 'I can not spell woth [EMAIL PROTECTED], where is tha
spiel
cheeker'? That's the one thing lacking in fckeditor. We are using
activedit as it comes with a spell checker off the shelf.
D
On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 09:27:45 -0800, Matt Robertson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Will
I only let my clients add/edit text on their sites. My cffiles handle any
images uploads they might need, so TinyMCE works perfectly for me.
Will
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Come on, this is overboard rude.
Russell
- Original Message -
From: Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
TinyMCE is the bomb, especially for xhtml/css
Will Tomlinson wrote:
I only let my clients add/edit text on their sites. My cffiles handle any
images uploads they might need, so TinyMCE works perfectly for me.
My clients can do that too, but most of them are too .. umm...
inexperienced.. to type in a URL to the image that they upload
-1014
#include stdjoke.h
-Original Message-
From: Irvin Gomez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 5:49 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
Does TinyMCE provide image and document upload/linking, like FCKEDitor
Ya know...the more I think about it, the LESS I want my client handling images
in FCKEditor OR Tiny MCE.
They have enough trouble with simple text formatting! Anyone with me here??
:) Will
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new
- http://www.thelimucompany.com/ - 407-804-1014
#include stdjoke.h
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 11:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
Ya know...the more I think about it, the LESS I want my client handling
images
I don't give clients any control over style...just content...unless
they threaten to break my fingers...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Will Tomlinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 25, 2005 11:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
Ya know...the more I think about
It depends on the particular situation. I have a client who needs to make a lot
of legal documents (as PDF or MS Word) available online and the document
upload/linking in FCKEditor is the perfect solution: it works flawlessly and
it's a one-step process.
As far as allowing minimal formatting
You can limit the functionality of TinyMCE, only allow certain tags be
used or simply only show the bold/italic/underline buttons. Of course
that doesn't stop them doing up some hunk o' junk in MS Word and pasting
it in.
I have one client that INSISTS on pasting from word. He's even pasted
Hi Dustin
I was referring to an editor that you can use via a webpage
- Original Message -
From: Dustin M Snell [Network Automation]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 6:24 PM
Subject: RE: HTML Editor
Why not Dreamweaver MX 2004
TinyMCE is the bomb, especially for xhtml/css support.
-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2005 5:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
Hi Dustin
I was referring to an editor that you can use via a webpage
- Original Message
TinyMCE is the bomb, especially for xhtml/css support.
Yeah, FCKEditor should be called, FCK FCKEditor!
:)
Will
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
Come on, this is overboard rude.
Russell
- Original Message -
From: Will Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2005 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
TinyMCE is the bomb, especially for xhtml/css support.
Yeah, FCKEditor
Does TinyMCE provide image and document upload/linking, like FCKEDitor?
TinyMCE is the bomb, especially for xhtml/css support.
-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2005 5:58
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
Hi Dustin
I
Irvin Gomez wrote:
Does TinyMCE provide image and document upload/linking, like FCKEDitor?
None of their examples have a browse server button in the image dialog,
so I'd wager that nothing could be done without some work. But I'm no
expert on TinyMCE.
I only know that the lack of such a
Why not Dreamweaver MX 2004? That's my favorite one.
-Dustin
-Original Message-
From: Mickael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2005 3:02 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: HTML Editor
Hello All,
I am sorry for being OT but I was wondering if anyone could point me in the
right
TinyMCE
http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/
Will
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a
client with Logware today.
Try Dreamweaver, if you can walk them through using it, the wysiwyg editor
is a lot more code friendly than M$
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Theobald" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:09 AM
Subject: OT: HTML editor for idiots?
You might want to try First Page. It's a free html editor and decent.
http://www.evrsoft.com/
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Theobald" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:09 AM
Subject: OT: HTML editor for idiots? recommendation?
js pseudo
html editor package - or go for Spectra - or really frighten them with the
cost of something broadvision or vignette!)
-Original Message-
From: Bryan LaPlante [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 April 2001 15:21
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: HTML editor for idiots? recommendat
I never thought I'd suggest such a programme, but Dreamweaver might be what
you're after. With the new version (4) you can make templates which have
'editable' and 'uneditable' regions, which allows you to lock off navigation
and things that you don't want anyone to mess with. Also it includes
]]
Sent: 18 April 2001 15:44
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: HTML editor for idiots? recommendation?
I never thought I'd suggest such a programme, but Dreamweaver might be what
you're after. With the new version (4) you can make templates which have
'editable' and 'uneditable' regions, which allows you
that up.
Hope that helps...
/\/\ichael
-Original Message-
From: Andy Ewings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 11:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: HTML editor for idiots? recommendation?
If this is no good you could look at making th content dynamic and building
. (.htr = no no via IIS)
Jeff Garza
Web Developer/Webmaster
Spectrum Astro, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.spectrumastro.com
-Original Message-
From: Larry W. Virden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 8:06 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: HTML editor for idiots
-talk@houseoffusion.com/).
Good luck.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Rosario [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 9:08 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: HTML editor for idiots? recommendation?
If you decide to write your own solution, you may consider forcing your
client
: Thursday, 19 April 2001 1:06
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: HTML editor for idiots? recommendation?
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 15:31:42 +0100
From: James Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(alternately suggest re-building the whole site with a remote
management system that hold editable content in a huge
Deepak,
Activedit 2.0 will be released this week, One of the main
features is that it can be used in a form, thus can be used as Spectra's
cfa_htmleditor The syntax is a bit different, but it does the same
thing...
cf_activedit fieldname="form_field" ...etc.
This is where the value
on 10/30/00 4:35 PM, Pete Freitag at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deepak,
Activedit 2.0 will be released this week, One of the main
features is that it can be used in a form, thus can be used as Spectra's
cfa_htmleditor The syntax is a bit different, but it does the same
thing...
No chance
: HTML Editor
on 10/30/00 4:35 PM, Pete Freitag at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Deepak,
Activedit 2.0 will be released this week, One of the main
features is that it can be used in a form, thus can be used as Spectra's
cfa_htmleditor The syntax is a bit different, but it does the same
thing
They already have one in Spectra!!!.
do a search on the Tag Gallery..
N
! ---
Neil Clark
Senior Web Applications Engineer
mcb digital
Tel. +44 (0)20 8941 3232
Tel. +44 (0)20 8408 8131 [Direct]
http://www.mcbdigital.com
---
We use eWebEditPro from Ektron. It's expensive, but they have tags that
integrate into spectra and replace the cfa_htmlEditor that is broken.
Mary
Archives:
cc:
eapps.com Subject: RE: HTML Editor
Ah, thanks for the correction!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 9:51 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: HTML Editor
David, It also runs on Netscape via a plugin. That is one of the reasons
we chose it.
Mary
directory. You have to map the server drive first and then go about
it.
Deepak
703.633.4257
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 12:50 PM
Subject: Re: HTML Editor
We use eWebEditPro from Ektron. It's
Most of the solutions out there (especially the ColdFusion ones) are all
based on the MSHTML editor. Information developing applications using this
component can be found here:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/browser/overview/editing.asp
Here's a list of the most popular ones that I've seen
tober 27, 2000 12:04 PM
Subject: RE: HTML Editor
They already have one in Spectra!!!.
do a search on the Tag Gallery..
N
! ---
Neil Clark
Senior Web Applications Engineer
mcb digital
Tel. +44 (0)20 8941 3232
Tel. +44 (0)20 8408 8131 [Direct]
http:
yep, it good for basic design and storyboarding like front page but it works
in both browsers...
:)
- Original Message -
From: Phil Labonte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 8:32 PM
Subject: html editor
Does anyone use the following editor instead
Phil,
Since its 100% free, I'd say download it and try it out yourself. Its a
very cool interface, and packed with useful stuff...its surprisingly similar
to ColdFusion Studio.
BTW, for some reason, the URL is a little bit tricky. To download this
software go to:
45 matches
Mail list logo
