-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?
It would perhaps be instructive to find a reasonably sized
FB3 app and
then port it to FB4 and also convert
. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?
It would perhaps be instructive to find a reasonably sized
FB3 app and
then port
Nicholas, there are major differences between Mach II and Fusebox 3.0 which really
make them incomparable. Here are some major differences.
FB 30 is a framework for procedural programming style (as against an OO based style).
Mach II is firmly rooted in an OO based style.
Mach II uses
speed enhancement within the framework.
M
-Original Message-
From: Mike Brunt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 2:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Mach II. Is it faster than Fusebox 3?
Nicholas, there are major differences between Mach II and Fusebox 3.0
which really
On Tuesday, Aug 19, 2003, at 12:06 US/Pacific, Haggerty, Mike wrote:
With all due respect, I think the distinctive differences between FB
and
Mach II do not prevent one from making a judgment as to which framework
is 'faster' for a given project.
Well, the code would have to be completely
5 matches
Mail list logo