Re: Metadata for code documentation (was RE: SURVEY RESULTS: Is ColdFusion OO?)

2007-07-12 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Wednesday 11 Jul 2007, Jaime Metcher wrote: there is no enforceable contract, so cfinterface turns into an elaborate commenting mechanism with a runtime performance penalty. Did you try the CF8 beta yet :-) ? That's the Mona Lisa smiley - I can tell you're thinking something, but

Re: Metadata for code documentation (was RE: SURVEY RESULTS: Is ColdFusion OO?)

2007-07-11 Thread Tom Chiverton
On Wednesday 11 Jul 2007, Jaime Metcher wrote: there is no enforceable contract, so cfinterface turns into an elaborate commenting mechanism with a runtime performance penalty. Did you try the CF8 beta yet :-) ? -- Tom Chiverton Helping to synergistically accelerate sexy e-business on:

Re: Metadata for code documentation (was RE: SURVEY RESULTS: Is ColdFusion OO?)

2007-07-11 Thread Dominic Watson
For example, if converting code from typed to untyped for performance reasons, Anyone know of an article that explains this (I'm blissfully unaware of this issue)... I like your thinking. I once wrote a CFC Documentor, for inhouse use, that documents the component in either HTML or Word XML

RE: Metadata for code documentation (was RE: SURVEY RESULTS: Is ColdFusion OO?)

2007-07-11 Thread Jaime Metcher
-Original Message- From: Tom Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 11 July 2007 7:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Metadata for code documentation (was RE: SURVEY RESULTS: Is ColdFusion OO?) On Wednesday 11 Jul 2007, Jaime Metcher wrote: there is no enforceable