.com
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder & Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Barney Boisvert
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:14 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 7 and window.open
You g
m: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 1:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7 and window.open
You got popup blocking enabled? Shouldn't matter, because it's an onClick,
but that might be it.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
>
You got popup blocking enabled? Shouldn't matter, because it's an onClick,
but that might be it.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 19, 2004 12:34 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: OT: Netscape 7 and window.open
>
> H
John said:
>Is it because you're using the void() function in the HREF? Maybe
>that's cancelling out or something in NS7.1? They could have made the
>void function actually do something. Besides that, everything looks
>good to me. That'd the only thing I can guess would cause a possible
>proble
Is it because you're using the void() function in the HREF? Maybe
that's cancelling out or something in NS7.1? They could have made the
void function actually do something. Besides that, everything looks
good to me. That'd the only thing I can guess would cause a possible
problem.
John
-
Kris Pilles said:
> I have outputted the variables on the page so I can see them it
> is the weirdest thing works fine in IE but not NS
Does it work from telnet?
Jochem
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
I ficed it... had NO-CACHE on the action page... seems to have corrected
thr problems by removing it
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7.x and CFSTOREDPROC
that's odd...i
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7.x and CFSTOREDPROC
I have outputted the variables on the page so I can see them it is the
weirdest thing works fine in IE but not NS
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[
I have outputted the variables on the page so I can see them it is
the weirdest thing works fine in IE but not NS
-Original Message-
From: Tony Weeg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 7.x and CFSTOREDPROC
have you/can you verify the data that is getting passed to the cfstoredproc.
browser shouldn't matter
apart from the data getting to the cfstored proc. form driven data? url
driven data?
id look there.
cf is server side, so it shouldn't matter
...tony
tony weeg
senior web applications archite
Subject: Re: Netscape 4.7 squares galore
Rob Rohan wrote:
> We just moved from 5 to MX and are cleaning up some final odds and ends.
One
> of the last things we are checking is to see if the site is at least
usable
> in 4.7 (I hate 4.7 I wish it would've been time bombed).
>
>
Rob Rohan wrote:
> We just moved from 5 to MX and are cleaning up some final odds and ends. One
> of the last things we are checking is to see if the site is at least usable
> in 4.7 (I hate 4.7 I wish it would've been time bombed).
>
> When I hit any page on the site, the text turns to squares.
It does not find the address whereas IE ias able to!
__
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thene
Kodjo Ackah wrote:
> Why can I not get my netscape to display this type address;
> http://192.168.0.1:6001
What error?
Jochem
__
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofit
e way.
-Original Message-
From: James Sleeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 3:41 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape and MX
> We are in the process of changing these over to run on MX. The problem is
> that anything with DHTML ends up causing the text in Netscap
> We are in the process of changing these over to run on MX. The problem is
> that anything with DHTML ends up causing the text in Netscape to change to
> either a little box indicating a character not supported for display by
> windows or a little cross like symbol. Everything still works fine in
> Has anyone encountered a problem where some code will work
> perfectly in Netscape but not work in IE. I am specifically
> wondering if anyone has encountered a problem on an action
> page where the code will process fine in Netscape and get
> hung up in IE never timing out.
>
> If anyone has, I
http://www.w3c.org
might be a good place to start..
Steven Lancaster
Barrios Technology
NASA/JSC
281-244-2444 (voice)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Edgar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 11:11 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: Netscape VS IE
Sorry f
Hope this helps!
http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/reference/browser_chart/
Paul Giesenhagen
QuillDesign
http://www.quilldesign.com
SiteDirector - Commerce Builder v2.0
- Original Message -
From: "Ryan Edgar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 1
Yep... Check for proper closing of , , and tags...
Depending upon the specifics Netscape can have trouble if not completed
properly.
At 11:56 AM 2/13/02 -0500, you wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Any reason why a page would display OK on IE, but not display anyhting
>on Netscape? I had this problem before
Tables, tables, tables.
Normally when the page "disappears" in NS (4.7 mostly), it is due to
tables with too few closes
Try adding a couple of times at the bottom of your
page, then removing them to find the right number of missing closes.
(I am fixing bad close tables in legacy pages even a
That's the famous "missing table tag" - people who like it say it helps you
code better, people who hate it say it's presumtuous, but the deal is, if
you are missing an end tag on your table () or sometimes an end
, it displays nada. Validate your html.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: Ro
Make sure all of your table elements are closed properly.
Kevin
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/13/02 08:56AM >>>
Hello,
Any reason why a page would display OK on IE, but not display anyhting
on Netscape? I had this problem before and I think it has to do with
proper html coding. Anyhting to look for?
e HTML.
>It has to be perfect to work.
>
>Send us the URL and we will be able to help you out better.
>
>Joel
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Gonzo Rock [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: December 13, 2001 11:13 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: Netscape is crashing
Ben,
YES! Thanks, pulling out the .css include changed everything... Now my job is to chase
down the Netscape specific .css problem... I have a netscape specific style sheet so
should not be t hard.
Thanks again,
This list rocks! now if I could just fix the 'ole it can't window.focus() pr
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: December 13, 2001 11:13 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape is crashing
Hey Dave,
Thanks for the ideas... have to say though... I'm very confused by the
fact that the viewed source from IE loads into Netscape without
incident. Does Apache feed slightly different code
Hey Dave,
Thanks for the ideas... have to say though... I'm very confused by the fact that the
viewed source from IE loads into Netscape without incident. Does Apache feed slightly
different code to a Netscape client?? I would think NOT.
I have been using an incHeader.cfm and a incFooter.cfm
If you're using css on the page, there could be a problem there. I've done
exactly as you describe: save the source from IE as a .html file, then open
that file in Netscape, and it works perfectly. Because this test .html file
wasn't including any of my .js or .css files, it didn't take long to
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 8:12 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape is crashing
Look for broken tables or tables nested more than 2 deep? Also, if your
page results rely on javascript in any way, you might want to look there.
No other ideas though without seeing the source code
Look for broken tables or tables nested more than 2 deep? Also, if your
page results rely on javascript in any way, you might want to look there.
No other ideas though without seeing the source code / html code.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: "Gonzo Rock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-T
Because of this problem and the fact that you
cant set cookies with cflocation there are a numbser of replacements
available
in the tag gallery:
http://devex.allaire.com/developer/gallery/SearchResults.cfm?keywords=cf_loc
ation
HTH
Kola Oyedeji |Web Developer |ekeda
elthorne gate |64 high stree
PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:54 AM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: Netscape Object Moved problem
>
>
>It is because of what CFLocation does.
>
>Netscape follows the standard to a T and IE does not.
>
>CFLocation issues a response code of 403 Object
So is the only way around this to do a CFHEADER instead of a CFLOCATION?
The solution I ended up going with was replacing my CFLocation with
-Original Message-
From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 11:54 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape
It is because of what CFLocation does.
Netscape follows the standard to a T and IE does not.
CFLocation issues a response code of 403 Object Moved.
The browser is supposed to resend the original request to the new page.
Netscape resends all of you form data to the new page. IE Does not do this
all i've got to say, wow.
why does IE get spanked so bad in a parallel comparison on this pge?
Jared Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 11/19/2001 11:32:43 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: Netscape 4.6
Not in all s
let me vent for a minute.. Netscape is a pile of dunk.
~~
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/
U
yup.. im sure microsoft didnt think that when they decided to take em down..
- Original Message -
From: "Tangorre, Michael T." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 10:23 PM
Subject: Netscape 4.6
> I just wanted to vent for a minute:
> Ne
The latest 4.x version is 4.78 for Communicator (with all of the cra% you never
want nor use - especially if you are a non-AOL hole - but is installed anyway).
The latest "Navigator" only install is 4.08, possibly 4.09.
The Netscape 6.2 install failed me today several times at 32% (a server dow
Clure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:04 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape 4.6
Yea 4.6 had a few problems.
6 is becoming better and better every new version. At some point it will be
useable to normal people.
At 11:23 PM 11/19/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I just w
Yea 4.6 had a few problems.
6 is becoming better and better every new version. At some point it will be
useable to normal people.
At 11:23 PM 11/19/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I just wanted to vent for a minute:
>Netscape 4.6 is a pile of dunk.
>
>Gnite.
>
>
>Michael T. Tangorre
>
>===
Seemed about the same, but right now I am a little bias :-)
-Original Message-
From: Jared Clinton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 12:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 4.6
Not in all situations,
check this javascript graph in IE http
Not in all situations,
check this javascript graph in IE http://tavernini.com/lorenz.html (too
sloow)
and then in netscape and see which one you prefer.
Jared Clinton.
-Original Message-
From: Tangorre, Michael T. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 20 November 2001 2:23 P
ve () on a method but the browsers are tolerant
and that can cause problems.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Tyrone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 and JS form submi
t;submit" or you will lose your hair like I did - confuses the browser
>big time.
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Dave Watts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:19 PM
>Subjec
n the form page.
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Vawter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:21 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Netscape 6 and JS form submitting
>
>
> I don't know if this applies or not but make sure you don't name a
submit
Stuart:
Perhaps you can post the code. I tested the example code I posted a few
minutes ago in Netscape 6 and it worked fine.
Andy
> -Original Message-
> From: Stuart Duncan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 6:28 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject:
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 4:19 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 and JS form submitting
> > Sorry for the very off topic post, but this has me stumped
> > and you all have always been the best place to go to for help.
> >
> > Netscape 6 has very
Yep, same thing... "Object is not a function"
I've found documentation that says that submit() is supported by Netscape
6, yet it continues to give me these problems it's so very frustrating.
At least if it was a complex problem that wasn't working, it wouldn't
bother me so much.
Stuart Du
What you are trying to do will not work in Internet Explorer, either, as
far as I can see.
Try this:
Hi there! You submitted the form!
Please Type Something:
Alternately, you can name the form and use
document.forms.formname.submit(); if you have multiple forms on the
page,
> Sorry for the very off topic post, but this has me stumped
> and you all have always been the best place to go to for help.
>
> Netscape 6 has very little documentation out there, so doing
> the simplest tasks seems tough.
>
> I am just trying to submit a form using Javascript... and it
> w
No real clue but off the top of my head it sounds like the history object
has changed. Why don't you print out the history array in your tag and then
abort, maybe you can see what is happening.
Don Vawter
www.cyberroomies.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Kamie Curfman" <
how very interesting. i didn't even really think about anything "launching"
the javascript. after one hit the submit button, one was taken to the action
page which contained right off the bat the custom form validation tag. if
there was a problem with one of the relevant form fields, that chunk
At 03:53 PM 08/27/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>Thanks for the response. The security check is a bit more comprehensive
>than a simple comparison of vairables - we do some data access/logging as
>well.
;)
> Putting the routine in application.cfm would also affect the login
>page so would requir
]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 6:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape Cookie Woes
At 02:29 PM 08/27/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>we have an application which uses a custom tag at the start of each
>template. This tag checks session variables against the required access
>level for the pa
frustrating hour or so finding that...
Shawn Grover
-Original Message-
From: Costas Piliotis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 27, 2001 3:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape Cookie Woes
As far as I understandm session state is maintained through a cookie. CFID
and CFTOKEN
At 02:29 PM 08/27/2001 -0600, you wrote:
>we have an application which uses a custom tag at the start of each
>template. This tag checks session variables against the required access
>level for the page and if need be, redirects to the login page.
>
>We are finding that Netscape refuses to run th
As far as I understandm session state is maintained through a cookie. CFID
and CFTOKEN are stored as cookie values. The session state is destroyed
when you destroy the cookies file. A new session is thus started and all of
your session variables are lost.
-Original Message-
From: Shaw
Are you sure ur Server has started and is running fine
---
The information transmitted is
I would guess that the cold fusion server isn't running. So the server is
returning it as an unknown mime type, which the browser typically will
prompt you to save the file.
Check your CF server.
HTH
Shawn Grover
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
Check the netscape mappings and see if .cfm is mapped to anything. Netscape
might be assuming its a file to be saved and run locally (like a PDF is).
At 10:52 AM 8/29/01, you wrote:
>Any idea why Netscape would want to save a .cfm file when a link is clicked?
>
>Works fine in IE.
>
>Kevin
>
>
>
Use something like
Instead of - it also doesnt break cookies
> that's because CFLOCATION essentially sends a "302" header.
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
F
that's because CFLOCATION essentially sends a "302" header. it instructs
the browser to go to that location because the "resource has been moved"...
sounds like your browser(s) don't know how to follow the link automatically.
chris olive, cio
cresco technologies
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.cre
If you think that netscape going away is going to make your life better,
let's think about this for a minute.
IE and the AOL branded browser are likely the two most common browsers on
the various Windows platform
IE and Netscape are likely the two most common browsers on the
the
alk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: NETSCAPE IS GOING AWAY! A Web Developer's Dream Come True!
> No it is not.
>
> jon
> - Original Message -
> From: "John McKown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" &
No it is not.
jon
- Original Message -
From: "John McKown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2001 1:24 PM
Subject: NETSCAPE IS GOING AWAY! A Web Developer's Dream Come True!
~~
Structure your Col
domain.com/realaudiocontent/#name#";>
-
Cheers,
David
-Original Message-
From: Dylan Bromby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape allows script downloads???
did you look at the .CFM fil
did you look at the .CFM file that downloads and actually see CF code? or is
it all HTML?
-Original Message-
From: David Grabbe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:33 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Netscape allows script downloads???
OK, So I have some RealAudio files
Thats ok, we can all be guilty of these little things MS has a bit too
answer for this I think!!
-Original Message-
From: Stevens, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2001 2:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape always keeps the day from getting boring
Wow, I
Wow, I can't believe I over looked that. Odd that Opera is taking the same
route as IE. Thanks for kicking my lethargic code in the behind.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 9:08 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape a
I wish IE as good as it is getting was not so forgiving, so that we as a
developer don't get too lazy.
-Original Message-
From: Michael A. Cady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, 12 May 2001 1:55 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape always keeps the day from getting b
Jason:
Netscape requires that you surround your form elements with and
tags.
Mike Cady
- Original Message -
From: "Stevens, Jason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2001 8:20 PM
Subject: OT: Netscape always keeps the day from getting boring
arthy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 April 2001 11:59
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6
I said it before and I'll say it again Mozilla is a great browser. Netscape
built NS6 on a 0.8 branch of Mozilla. When the next version of Netscape come
out you should a good browser, with a great J
nal Message-
>>From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 4:29 PM
>>To: CF-Talk
>>Subject: RE: Netscape 6
>>
>>
>>And people wunder why no one bothers to suport it :-)
>>
>>> -Original Message--
And people wunder why no one bothers to suport it :-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Benjamin S. Rogers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 25 April 2001 14:52
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Netscape 6
>
>
> That is a known bug in Netscape 6. The latest updates h
That is a known bug in Netscape 6. The latest updates have not yet fixed the
problem.
Benjamin S. Rogers
Web Developer, c4.net
Voice: (508) 240-0051
Fax: (508) 240-0057
-Original Message-
From: Mike Provoost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 12:47 AM
To: CF-Talk
>Has anyone else had problems with coldfusion and netscape 6? For some
>reason, it seems to lose form vars when they're passed to the action page.
>
>My code works in Netscape 4.x and IE so I know it's not a code issue.
I had the same problem doing development with version 4.5 of CF.
until I rea
Mike,
Are you attempting to pass variables from a non-secure page to a secure
page?
- Chris
Christopher Cortes |Coming Q3 2001:
Consultant |
Stonebridge Technologies, Inc. | Optimizing ColdFusion
Putting Technology To Work |
plugin for NN that will let them display. Maybe give people a link to the
plugin if there is one.
JLB
-Original Message-
From: Rosa, Issac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 4:48 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape equivalent of
I tried in the following code, but I
M$ is the only browser that will display a ppt in the browser, that I'm
aware of.
- Original Message -
From: "Rosa, Issac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 3:48 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape equivalent o
: lv2bounce
http://www.cs.odu.edu/~bader
> -Original Message-
> From: Brook Davies [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 4:38 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Netscape equivalent of
>
>
> The tag is very buggy. The tag is
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: JLB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 2:25 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape equivalent of
and are the closest tags. But they are not nearly as easy
to work with as iframes.
-Original Message-
From: Rosa, Issa
The tag is very buggy. The tag is also buggy. You will
have difficulty embedding them within a table.
At 02:01 PM 18/04/01 -0500, you wrote:
>Closest thing to the in NS is the tag. Don't know if it can
>embed files in it like the iframe tag can.
>
>"Rosa, Issac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
quot;thedivNN"].document.src=link;
document.layers["thedivNN"].document.close();
-Original Message-
From: Bernd VanSkiver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 3:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape equivalent of
Closest thi
Closest thing to the in NS is the tag. Don't know if it can
embed files in it like the iframe tag can.
"Rosa, Issac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of an equivalent in Netscape to the IE tag . NS6
> supports the tag, but we are currently using NS4 as corp standard. I need
> to
Steven Semrau
SRA International, Inc.
Senior Member, Professional Staff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Com: (703) 805-1095
DSN: (703) 655-1095
-Original Message-
From: Rosa, Issac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Netscape eq
and are the closest tags. But they are not nearly as easy
to work with as iframes.
-Original Message-
From: Rosa, Issac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 1:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Netscape equivalent of
Does anyone know of an equivalent in Netscape to th
Take a look at ILayer.
-Original Message-
From: Rosa, Issac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Netscape equivalent of
Does anyone know of an equivalent in Netscape to the IE tag . NS6
supports the tag, but we are currently using NS
what kind of hardware do you have associated with your application?
We had some problems at first with this same issue but it was because of
multiple boxes.
- Original Message -
From: "Eric V. Hodge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001
make sure your session variables are locked
-Original Message-
From: Eric V. Hodge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 9:50 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: netscape and session variables
when testing my application session variables work under IE, but not
Netscape. I
Why then would this error only be happening with Netscape. I can log in
with IE as much as I want.
Hatton
-Original Message-
From: Deb Dickerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 11:10 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape and CFApplication Error
And when you
And when you get the 1450 error when dealing with client variables, it's
usually because you've reached the maximum size for the registry itself.
Debbie
> -Original Message-
> From: Christoph Schmitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2001 8:22 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Su
there are a couple problems. first you need ending tags for you table and
tr's and td's, then you need to urlencode that link.
that is:
Please http://www.accommodationnewzealand.com/nzl/mkt/creditcardform.cfm?busi
nessname=#urlencodedformat('Shalimares')#&address1=#urlencodedformat('9
Shalimar
> ? I was under the impression the info being passed was the property to be
> rented/leased etc. not client info (which was being entered next page).
>
> If it was client info, then by all means don't do it the way I suggested;
> and don't pass it clear text in url either as that's almost as
> bad
as bad. SSL for
anything sensitive.
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: January 23, 2001 07:00
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape error whilst IE is fine
> Not exactly an answer, but...
>
>Instead of passing all the information in the
D]]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 1998 12:15
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape error whilst IE is fine
excuse my naivety how do I create a hidden form facility and still use links
appearance
- Original Message -
From: "Philip Arnold - ASP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk&quo
> excuse my naivety how do I create a hidden form facility and
> still use links appearance
You need to name the forms and then have the hyperlink calling Submit via
JS;
click here to submit
click here to submit
This should work, but it's typed directly, so I haven't tested it...
Philip
excuse my naivety how do I create a hidden form facility and still use links appearance
- Original Message -
From: "Philip Arnold - ASP" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2001 9:40 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape
> Not exactly an answer, but...
>
>Instead of passing all the information in the url, you might
> instead want
> to only pass a unique identifier. Then on the page in question, query the
> database based on the unique id for the information.
>
> http://www.accomodationsnewzealand.com/nzl/mkt/c
Not exactly an answer, but...
Instead of passing all the information in the url, you might instead want
to only pass a unique identifier. Then on the page in question, query the
database based on the unique id for the information.
http://www.accomodationsnewzealand.com/nzl/mkt/creditcardform?
y
the system manager.
**
> -Original Message-
> From: AustralianAccommodation.com Pty. Ltd.
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 January 1998 11:27
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Netscape error whilst IE is fine
>
>
> no the page is being created by the user cli
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
