> Known Netscape 6 bug list.
> http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/mozilla.html
I just got a phone call from Rentokill about my Netscape 6 installation
hehehehe
Philip Arnold
Director
Certified ColdFusion Developer
ASP Multimedia Limited
T: +44 (0)20 8680 1133
"Websites for the real world"
**
Yeah it sucks bad!
- Original Message -
From: "Jon Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 1:21 PM
Subject: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH
> Known Netscape 6 bug list.
>
> http://www.
Known Netscape 6 bug list.
http://www.richinstyle.com/bugs/mozilla.html
jon
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Everland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 9:04 AM
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
http://developer.netscape.com/docs/technote/dynhtml/collapse/index.html
The example DHTML code on this page in netscape's site doesn't work in
Netscape 6.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Simon Park Computer Systems Management, Inc.
Ph: 703-823-4300 x119 205
i've tried four installations and still i can't netscape 6 to load. it
installs fine. but when i launch it, it displays the the splash screen
that says "Netscape 6", the java console loads in my system tray, and
that's all that happens. the process continues to run (using no CPU)
until i end it wi
> In case it helps anyone, this is the resource that I used to
> make my stuff work in N6 as well as the other two:
Thanks.
Benjamin S. Rogers
Web Developer, c4.net
voice: (508) 240-0051
fax: (508) 240-0057
-
obert Everland III [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 8:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
Go to www.dixonusa.com then click no flash then click shopping. That little
application works perfect in IE 4-5 and Netscape 4.7 not 6
Bob
-Original Me
on 11/16/00 8:39 PM, Nick Betts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Rob, I agree with your comments, but after looking at your company website
> (home page and contact us only?) I wonder whether you are putting your
> thoughts into actions..
You are, of course, free to assume what you like.
--
Rob
-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH [OT]
on 11/16/00 8:57 AM, Scott, Andrew at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would consider Web Design easy, because it actually is. However its when
> you wish to start to do application development that it becomes harder.
I disagree with this statement
In case it helps anyone, this is the resource that I used to
make my stuff work in N6 as well as the other two:
http://sites.netscape.net/ekrock/standards.html
It tells you everything you need to know about what N6 *deliberately*
won't handle.
Doesn't help you with the N6 bugs of course.
These
on 11/16/00 8:57 AM, Scott, Andrew at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I would consider Web Design easy, because it actually is. However its when
> you wish to start to do application development that it becomes harder.
I disagree with this statement. GOOD web design is not easy and the way in
which y
Go to www.dixonusa.com then click no flash then click shopping. That little
application works perfect in IE 4-5 and Netscape 4.7 not 6
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Gavin Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 3:31 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out
]
-Original Message-
From: Michael Kear [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2000 16:05
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
Well I for one am thankful that it's not a piece of cake to develop
reliable websites.
If it was easy, there'd be a FrontPage that works fine, a
> The thing that bugged me was the user isn't given an option to not have
> any existing defaults changed during installation, NS6 just makes the
> changes without asking.
I was given the choice during the installation of NS6. Said no and all works
just like it always has.
Ken
---
>-Original Message-
>From: Gavin Myers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 2:31 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
>Does anyone have any specific examples of things that don't
>work like they
>used to? L
there is a 25 meg file at
ftp://ftp.netscape.com//pub/netscape6/english/6.0/windows/win32/sea/N6Setup.
exe
that should be the full install as far as I can tell
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/
OTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
Any one else have trouble running it? I d/loaded and installed it fine, but
It crashes on startup! I even uninstalled it, then reinstalled it and it
still crashes!
I'm not impressed.
Jeff F
Yes, go to their FTP site: ftp.netscape.com it's under the 'pub' directory.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
My main question is: is there any
I just downloaded N6 and didn't really see anything wrong with it so far. It
has better support for CSS (a: hover works finally).
But as of yet (last 30 minutes) i haven't seen any mission critical things
with it yet.
Does anyone have any specific examples of things that don't work like they
use
6 out UGH
My main question is: is there anyway to download the entire thing at once?
(I hate these stupid internet setup programs that are starting to be
popular. You can't save the thing to cdr or share to setup on intranet
machines.)
11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
My main question is: is there anyway to download the entire thing at once?
(I hate these stupid internet setup programs that are starting to be
popular. You can't save the thing to cdr or share to setup on intranet
machines.)
er 15, 2000 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
My main question is: is there anyway to download the entire thing at once?
(I hate these stupid internet setup programs that are starting to be
popular. You can't save the thing to cdr or share to setup on intranet
machine
It gives you an option to save the setup files to disk. You should be able
to copy those to a CD and do an install from the CD.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 11:31 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
My main question is: is there anyway to download the entire thing at once?
(I hate these stupid internet setup programs that are starting to be
popular. You can't save the thi
Hi,
Our observations are similar to Nicks. All of the issue we had with Netscape 6 ended
up being our not adhering 100% to the standards. Both Netscape 4.X and IE 5 let much
not-compliant code pass.
To echo others from the list, the compliance CSS and DOM plus bug fixes for things in
4.X whic
OTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 10:34 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, No
My main question is: is there anyway to download the entire thing at once?
(I hate these stupid internet setup programs that are starting to be
popular. You can't save the thing to cdr or share to setup on intranet
machines.)
--min
---
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 November 2000 15:34
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Scott, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <
I disagree with this mentality completely. All browsers should be
standards compliant so that us developers can spend more time doing the
things we are really paid to do: develop kick-ass web-based
APPLICATIONS. Spending hours tweaking this and that and making
compromises to achieve some sembla
.au
>
>
>
>On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Scott, Andrew wrote:
>
>> *lol* Well we can all wish/hope for miracles!
>>
>> regards
>>
>> Andrew Scott
>> Senior Cold Fusion Application Developer
>> ANZ eCommerce Centre
>> * Ph 9273 0693
&
: re: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH
Isn't that a bit like riding a bicycle instead of owning a car, because a
car may break down.
I personally use IE, because it does more. if oyu look at netscape 6 they
have obviously been looking to catch up to the goodies available in IE.
Now what will y
- Original Message -
From: "Scott, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 10:42 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
> Correct me if I am wrong, but mozilla being the very first offical
bro
> Whenever I'm sitting fretting over something tricky that isn't working
> after 3 hours of working on it, I'm reminded of a sage word of wisdom my
> father told me ... "No one pays big money for something any fool could
> do!"
>
hmm apparently you haven't been following the US election very
on on netscape?
Actually i lied i don't use IE i'm a Neoplanet man (a skin to IE5.0)
maybe we need a recount
Mike Cartier
#code.monkey#
> ** Original Subject: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH
> ** Original Sender: "Justin Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ** Origin
> I have basic Javascript in my browser that works completely
> fine in Netscape 4.7. Now Netscape 6 comes out and it doesn't
> work, what is up with that.
I think there are a couple of different issues here.
Firstly, the main reason JS written for NN4.7 won't work in
N6 is that NN4.7 is *hideou
9273 0693
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 15 November 2000 08:44
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
> Does any of this really matter? All that they should care
> > I see Netscape as the HTML equivalent to coding with "Strict Attribute
> > Validation" turned on .
>
> I think you mean "lowest common denominator"
Perhaps, but I was referring more to the fact that Netscape points out HTML
problems much more readily than IE does, which forces the coder to fo
Virden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:50 PM
>Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
> > In my opinion, IE was what killed the entire topic of web browsers - it
> > stinks, Netscape is getting to be as ba
00 13:05
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
I for one could not find anything positive to say about Netscape 6. It never
once blew me away. I have basic Javascript in my browser that works
completely fine in Netscape 4.7. Now Netscape 6 comes out and it doesn't
work, what is up
Everyone can
be a M$ hater all they want but at least they know how to make a browser.
Bob Everland
-Original Message-
From: Scott, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 8:47 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
I think it depends a lot on Corpor
> I see Netscape as the HTML equivalent to coding with "Strict Attribute
> Validation" turned on .
I think you mean "lowest common denominator"
c
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@house
]
Sent: 15 November 2000 12:09
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH
> IE, while not everyone's most favorite, actually does tolerate developers
> more. It allows for errors. Figures out what you were most likely trying
to do.
>
> Netscape doesn't allow for that as
Application Developer
ANZ eCommerce Centre
* Ph 9273 0693
* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Jaime Garza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2000 11:52
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
This is a multi-part message in MIME format
I'm sure that the Microsoft developers would be very surprised to hear
this. Early versions of both Netscape and IE were both based on the
original NCSA Mosaic code, but those days are long gone.
Kevin
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/14/00 12:50PM >>>
I also hate to tell you that IE and Netscape are
> IE, while not everyone's most favorite, actually does tolerate developers
> more. It allows for errors. Figures out what you were most likely trying
to do.
>
> Netscape doesn't allow for that as much. But if you do exactly what it had
> intended, then it could very well work better than IE.
For
lla in USER_AGENT is from mozilla.org, but from the
prehistory of Netscape.
> -Original Message-
> From: Jon Hall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 3:38 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
> Have
: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
Does any of this really matter? All that they should care about is if there
browser conforms the W3C specifications so I can count on things to work how
they are suppose to. Not how they are suppose to according to Microsoft or
Netscape or any other browser. I thought
> > IE is based off of Mozilla?
>
> Have you taken a look at your user_agent string lately?
>
> HTTP_USER_AGENT=Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0)
That doesn't mean that IE is based off of Mozilla. It means that it
identifies itself to HTTP servers as compatible with Netscape 4.
g to these
>standards then Netscape.
>
>Rick
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Raymond K. Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 3:28 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
>IE is based off of Mozilla? Did I wake up on
ber 14, 2000 4:28 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
> IE is based off of Mozilla? Did I wake up on another planet today? As far
as
> I know, thats _defintely_ not the case.
> (Although I prefer IE over Netscape as you do.)
>
>
point of the
W3C. I just always thought Microsoft did a better job at conforming to these
standards then Netscape.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Raymond K. Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 3:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
IE is base
PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Raymond K. Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 November 2000 08:28
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
IE is based off of Mozilla? Did I wake up on another planet today? As far as
I know, thats _defintely_ not the case.
(Although I
an you have to hate it.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: Larry W. Virden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
> In my opinion, IE was what killed the entire topic of web browsers - it
> stink
> I also hate to tell you that IE and Netscape are based off
> of the open source Mozilla project which Opera has followed
> closely with.
While I prefer IE to other browsers, I don't think there's anything in IE
which has to do with Mozilla, or open source in general for that matter.
For brow
IE is based off of Mozilla? Did I wake up on another planet today? As far as
I know, thats _defintely_ not the case.
(Although I prefer IE over Netscape as you do.)
===
Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Al
. Just because
it's Microsoft doesn't mean you have to hate it.
Greg
- Original Message -
From: Larry W. Virden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 1:50 PM
Subject: RE: Netscape 6 out UGH
> In my opinion, IE was wha
In my opinion, IE was what killed the entire topic of web browsers - it
stinks, Netscape is getting to be as bad, or perhaps even worse now, and
everyone else went off and pouted because the big boys didn't want to let
them play ball. That's too bad - at least the iCab, Opera and a few other
team
Netscape 6 is crap, Go get a nightly build of Mozilla..
NO ONE is going to use or support Netscape 6 until they
get it working right, they have not. It is a huge bloated
marketing tool.
Use Mozilla, its like the directors cut of netscape minus
all the stupid BS like AIM and the AOL Icons on you
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--=_NextPart_000_00B6_01C04E25.AC752A10
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On the other hand, I had code that only worked and looked good in IE, and
broke badly in Netscape 4.75. With 6 it at le
Perhaps it isn't a matter of Netscape 'not fixing' the language they invented,
but a matter of them changing the way that the language works? Seems that's
a pretty popular thing for people like Netscape, Microsoft, etc. to do on
a quarterly basis...
--
"See, he's not just anyone ... he's my son
go to www.netscape.com, click on the link to download netscape6, and
javascript error: 'is_ie' is undefined
nice
Bert
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 14 November 2000 18:01
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Netscape 6 out UGH
>
>
>
61 matches
Mail list logo
