RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-06 Thread Kevin Bridges
: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java I think the two big balance points are: Java developers are more expensive because they are few in numbers. v. MSCDs and MSCEs are everywhere, and cheaper. If java became

Java and MS in the schools (WAS Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java)

2003-01-06 Thread John Paul Ashenfelter
] - Original Message - From: Kevin Bridges [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 3:38 PM Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java The only way you'll see a reversal in numbers/pay is if schools were capable of separating business and actually educate ... Microsoft

RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-06 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java The only way you'll see a reversal in numbers/pay is if schools were capable of separating business and actually educate ... Microsoft rules the schools and uses the schools to educate students on Microsoft products, great for MS, bad for the industry

Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-03 Thread Joe Eugene
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: RE: CFMX and Java With sofware giants like IBM/Oracle/Sun/Bea pushing Java and J2EE...Just guess.. the open platform is going to win. Java as the open platform? Java is a platform supported by multiple vendors, yes, but I don't believe

RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-03 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
Systems Developer Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Distance Education Division -Original Message- From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java opps... Java as the open platform? Java

RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-03 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
you. -mk -Original Message- From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 10:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java opps... Java as the open platform? Java is a platform supported by multiple vendors, yes, but I don't believe this qualifies

RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-03 Thread Adrocknaphobia Jones
School of Public Health Distance Education Division -Original Message- From: Joe Eugene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RE: RE: CFMX and Java opps... Java as the open platform? Java is a platform supported by multiple vendors

RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-03 Thread Mark A. Kruger - CFG
... ergo Java would have less of a faithful following among developers (lol)... -Original Message- From: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java I think the two big balance points

RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-03 Thread Rob Rohan
12:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java I think the two big balance points are: Java developers are more expensive because they are few in numbers. v. MSCDs and MSCEs are everywhere, and cheaper. If java became the big open source language used by all, you would most likely see

RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java

2003-01-03 Thread Kevin Bridges
: Adrocknaphobia Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 2:02 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: RE: CFMX and Java I think the two big balance points are: Java developers are more expensive because they are few in numbers. v. MSCDs and MSCEs are everywhere, and cheaper. If java became