Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread ksuh
application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the cf_applicationtag? It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere. [Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Dwayne Cole
application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the cf_applicationtag? It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in Application.cfm.In fact, you can use it anywhere. Does CF still look for an application.cfm page to process? [Todays Threads] [This Message]

RE: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Tony Weeg
ALWAYS! ...tony tony weeg senior web applications architect navtrak, inc. www.navtrak.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] 410.548.2337 -Original Message- From: Dwayne Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

RE: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Tangorre, Michael
Always... all the way up to the root of your drive. -Original Message- From: Dwayne Cole [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 12:11 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use

Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread Charlie Griefer
From: Dwayne Cole To: CF-Talk Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 10:11 AM Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox application.cfm.And does that mean that I can still use the cf_applicationtag? It is a common misperception that the cfapplication tag only works in Application.cfm.In

Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox

2003-12-01 Thread ksuh
In Fusebox 3, the cfapplication tag is normally placed in the fbx_settings file. - Original Message - From: Charlie Griefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Monday, December 1, 2003 10:24 am Subject: Re: RE: Application.cfm and Fusebox From: Dwayne Cole To: CF-Talk Sent: Monday

RE: RE: application.cfm

2003-03-27 Thread Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX)
Yep, you cannot have a blank application or onrequestend.cfm page You can simply put a CF comment in it as well, that should be enough. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 27 March 2003 15:23 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re:RE: application.cfm CF5

RE: RE: application.cfm

2003-03-27 Thread Pascal Peters
Actually CF doesn't allow a blank template. You can avoid this by having just one CR/LF in the file. You don't need a CF tag -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: donderdag 27 maart 2003 16:23 To: CF-Talk Subject: Re:RE: application.cfm CF5 does not

RE: RE: application.cfm

2003-03-27 Thread Raymond Camden
: www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus/blog Yahoo IM : morpheus My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda -Original Message- From: Pascal Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 9:32 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: RE: application.cfm Actually CF doesn't allow

Re: RE: Application.cfm

2003-01-21 Thread ksuh
Ahh, I now have no reason to use ISAPI filters. This will help us out big time. - Original Message - From: Samuel R. Neff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 11:42 am Subject: RE: Application.cfm Also keep an eye out for an article coming to CFDJ about J2EE servlet

Re: RE: Application.cfm

2003-01-21 Thread ksuh
I think Amazon.com should have no-click shopping. The moment you go on their website, they make a purchase for you. It would have prevented the whole dot-com crash :) - Original Message - From: Cantrell, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:26 pm Subject: RE: