RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-05 Thread Aidan Whitehall
Here's an example of a batch file that you could schedule via AT or WinAT (or any other non-CF scheduling service). The first two lines set NT [snip] Thanks for that Jim - appreciated. -- Aidan Whitehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netshopper UK Ltd Advanced Web Solutions Services

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2?

2000-10-05 Thread Damon Cooper
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:30:52 -0700 From: "Jaime Garza" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know that if you schedule two tasks to start at the same ti

Re: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2?

2000-10-05 Thread Jim McAtee
e sure you're on SP1. Thanks Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:30:52 -0700 From: "Jaime Garza" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2? Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] I know that if you schedule

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2?

2000-10-05 Thread Marcello Frutig
ain if on the same server ) uses another request and uses a thread. Now if both scheduled task are long running request then you will be tying up 4 threads for that time and the server could appear hung. Also, be sure you're on SP1. Thanks D

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-04 Thread Aidan Whitehall
Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past releases? I've never trusted it, always using Windows AT to run batch files launching templates. I'm really struggling with the scheduler at the moment... nuthin' seems to work (haven't tried setting up events using the CFSCHEDULE

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-04 Thread Top-Link Tech (John Ceci)
AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1 Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past releases? I've never trusted it, always using Windows AT to run batch files launching templates. I'm really struggling with the scheduler at the moment... nuthin' seems

Re: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-04 Thread JustinMacCarthy
is on this list . Justin - Original Message - From: "Aidan Whitehall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 4:47 PM Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1 Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past r

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-04 Thread Aidan Whitehall
I believe in the Windows NT resource kit you can find WinAT which is a graphical interface to teh command line AT command, that should help you a ton into using it... Thanks... I'll look into that. -- Aidan Whitehall [EMAIL PROTECTED] Netshopper UK Ltd Advanced Web Solutions Services

Re: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-04 Thread Howie Hamlin
it's not much. Ask Howie about it he is on this list . Justin - Original Message - From: "Aidan Whitehall" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 4:47 PM Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1 Is CFS

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2?

2000-10-04 Thread Jaime Garza
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2000 8:48 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1 Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past releases? I've never trusted it, always using Windows AT to run batch files launching templates. I'm

Re: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-04 Thread Jim McAtee
tober 04, 2000 9:47 AM Subject: RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1 Is CFSCHEDULE any more reliable in v4.5.1 than in past releases? I've never trusted it, always using Windows AT to run batch files launching templates. I'm really struggling with the scheduler at the moment... n

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1. SP2?

2000-10-04 Thread fp
I have been using Arcana Scheduler for the last few years and couldn't be happier Does all kinds of task scheduling at $55.00 per server. Details can be found at: http://www.arcanadev.com/scheduler/ Frank --

RE: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-03 Thread Randy Adkins
I have been using the CFSCHEDULE in 4.01 and 4.51 and runs great for me. Server platform: Windows NT SP 4 -Original Message- From: Jim McAtee [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 03, 2000 4:20 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1 Is CFSCHEDULE any

Re: Reliability of CFSCHEDULE in CF 4.5.1

2000-10-03 Thread Russell Jones
A core piece of our site depended heavily on CFSCHEDULE operating properly. Of course it didn't so we had to find another ways to schedule the executions of site pages. From: "Jim McAtee" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 14:19:55 -0600 To: CF-Talk [EMAIL