> > > if i understand correctly, a week or so ago you (dave)
> > > mentioned that duplicate was only necessary for a session
> > > structure if it contained other complex variables. you said
> > > that StructCopy was sufficient if it was merely a structure
> > > with simple variables. is this
13:53
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
>
>
> Which is not surprising. The issue was that Duplicate was not
> creating a
> true copy under certain situations. Instead it was creating pointers.
> This then would cause problems just like using app/session/s
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:45 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
>
>
> Well, the 'issue' (to put it mildly) that we experienced
> appeared to be one
> of memory corruption. We got inconsistent, very vague error messages,
> sometimes
ssage-
From: gyrus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:32 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Request Scope Questions
> Bare in mind that CF 4.5 had a um, 'issue' with Duplicate. You can
> download a hotfix for it though.
What was the issue?! I've got se
, November 12, 2001 10:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
I don't know if you mean me, but if so, I did not say structcopy is
faster. I said it _may_ be faster, but if so, most likely not in any
significant manner.
(If I'm wrong, sorry. As always, listen to what I
"What father would hesitate to say 'if there must be trouble let it be in my
day, that my child may have peace'?"
- Thomas Paine, An American Crisis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 11:12 AM
To: CF-
> if i understand correctly, a week or so ago you (dave)
> mentioned that duplicate was only necessary for a session
> structure if it contained other complex variables. you said
> that StructCopy was sufficient if it was merely a structure
> with simple variables. is this correct?
Yes, that'
t there is less ambiguity.
Jeremy Allen
elliptIQ Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
I don't know if you mean me, but if so, I did not say structcopy is
faster.
ROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:33 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
>
>
> as ray points out, in "principle", structcopy should be
> faster. by what
> margin, i don't know. but the principle remains.
>
> c
ristopher Olive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 November 2001 15:21
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
if i understand correctly, a week or so ago you (dave) mentioned that
duplicate was only necessary for a session structure if it contained
other complex variables. you said
> Bare in mind that CF 4.5 had a um, 'issue' with Duplicate. You can
> download a hotfix for it though.
What was the issue?! I've got several sites live that are relying
on Duplicate for passing session vars to request scope, and
I'm not sure if the hosts have all the latest patches.
- Gyrus
erful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Christopher Olive [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 10:21 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
>
>
> if i understand correctly, a week or so ago you (dav
, cto, vp of web development
cresco technologies, inc
410.825.0383
http://www.crescotech.com
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 5:00 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Request Scope Questions
> A couple of notes here: if you do this,
Thanks for the tips...it was educational! - Kinley
>From: "gyrus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: CF-Talk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Request Scope Questions
>Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 03:59:32 -
>
> > I've be
Your description is right on target with regard to request scope. Wasn't
aware of the point Peter brought up about request being the default.
Request scope is a local scope, like the variables scope, which unlike
request does NOT persist to CFMODULE or custom tag calls.
Its just handier to refe
> I've been trying to brush up on my CF skills and I'm a bit confused with
> Request Variables.
The request scope lasts for the duration of each request. If
you define request.var, every file (includes, custom tags,
whatever) that's processed from then on in the course of
that HTTP request has a
I may be wrong but once set (eg: in the application.cfm file) if you do not
provide a scope (eg: Application., Session., Client., they become variables
in the REQUEST scope. You can then access them anywhere in a template
without using a scope, eg:
You should be able to access this without A
17 matches
Mail list logo
