Ok, I found the way to test for it. Using REGEX... <[^>]{1,}<[Cc][Ff]
At the moment I really don't care about "writeable". :P
I once had a co-worker that wrote code that had 5 cfifs inside of one
input tag. That was in one single (run-on) line of code! Very hard for
the follow up (meant tha
>>It is more readable (in my opinion).
May be, but it is less "writable" ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Thanks.
~
--Original Message-
From: DURETTE, STEVEN J (ATTASIAIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 9:21 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Searching for improperly nested tags (tags inside of tags).
That would work for thing inside of strings, but one of the other things I get
is
That would work for thing inside of strings, but one of the other things
I get is:
checked>
Our policy uses:
It is more readable (in my opinion).
Thanks for the idea though, that might be a starting point!
Steve
~~~
Simplest way to search for things like that might be to search for "< in
your string.
-Original Message-
From: DURETTE, STEVEN J (ATTASIAIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 8:05 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Searching for improperly nested tags (tags inside of tags).
5 matches
Mail list logo