Michael, are you running RedSky? This sounds like a classic sympton of
the page context bug.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Mindseye, Inc
(www.mindseye.com)
Member of Team Macromedia (http://www.macromedia.com
127.0.0.1
tony.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 10:17 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Sessions and CFCs
> The cache setup and the use look OK. What about the CFC itself?
I posted it to this thread earlier (in reply to Raym
Hi Michael,
I show 6,1,0,63958 on all boxes that I've upgraded. Definitely very strange
what you're seeing...
chris
>-Original Message-
>From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:17 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: Re: Session
On Sunday, Aug 10, 2003, at 21:43 US/Pacific, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Running full release of 6.1 on a machine that was running the beta.
Hmm, weird. The page context bug is *definitely* fixed in Red Sky, even
in the beta versions!
> What is this page context bug, where can I read more about i
On Monday, Aug 11, 2003, at 02:18 US/Pacific, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> I've tested it out a few ways to Sunday and the results are always the
> same. As
> long as the CFC is cached, only the first 'use' of the CFC will result
> in any
> session information being written for the user.
The cache
Running full release of 6.1 on a machine that was running the beta. What is this
page context bug, where can I read more about it and is there a fix (or is it
just a symptom of me caching the code)?
Thanks
> Michael, are you running RedSky? This sounds like a classic sympton of
> the page context
> The cache setup and the use look OK. What about the CFC itself?
I posted it to this thread earlier (in reply to Raymond)
> > Is it possible that when I upgraded to 6.1 from the last beta
> > something went
> > wrong? I'm seeing 6,1,0,60662 as the build.
>
> You should see 6,1,0,63958 as the bu
/blog
Yahoo IM : morpheus
"My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 11:44 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Sessions and CFCs
>
>
>
ly very strange
> what you're seeing...
>
> chris
>
>
>
> >-Original Message-
> >From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:17 PM
> >To: CF-Talk
> >Subject: Re: Sessions and CFCs
> >
> >&
I've tested it out a few ways to Sunday and the results are always the same. As
long as the CFC is cached, only the first 'use' of the CFC will result in any
session information being written for the user. Every additional attempt results
in no session being written.
This is the code.
caching:
Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 3:18 AM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > Subject: Re: Sessions and CFCs
> >
> >
> > I've tested it out a few ways to Sunday and the results are
> > always the same. As long as the CFC
ugust 11, 2003 3:18 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Sessions and CFCs
>
>
> I've tested it out a few ways to Sunday and the results are
> always the same. As long as the CFC is cached, only the first
> 'use' of the CFC will result in any session information
On Sunday, Aug 10, 2003, at 14:19 US/Pacific, Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> OK, here's an interesting one. I have a CFC that I cached into the
> application
> scope. All it does is check a users name and password, writes some
> info to their
> session and exits. First run, no problem. It works. Secon
13 matches
Mail list logo
