RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-03 Thread Darren Adams
We use ewebeditpro 2 in a content management tool. I can highly recommend this. Daz -Original Message- From: jon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 03 May 2002 15:55 To: CF-Talk Subject:RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro We installed SOeditor on an intranet

RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-03 Thread jon
We installed SOeditor on an intranet site -- basically, we needed a way for non-techies to update their sites via a WYSIWYG editor. I have to say, we've been VERY happy with it. Installation was a snap -- we were upgrading from that old, free ezedit thing -- and it dropped right in. Tons of setta

Re: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-02 Thread Valerie L. Criswell
We just purchased soEditor pro unencrypted last month and I installed several instances of it for one client. I did have a few technical issues which turned out to not be bugs, but problems that I needed to handle on my own end. The support for soEditor is very good. There is a very active forum

RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-01 Thread Pete Freitag
You might also want to check out ActivEdit http://www.cfdev.com/activedit/ __ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.u

RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-01 Thread Eric J Hoffman
l Dog Design) -Original Message- From: Pardeep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:44 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro Does anyone know the URL to take a look at soEditor? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

Re: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-01 Thread Paul Giesenhagen
PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:15 PM > Subject: RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro > > > > For decent functionality when you can guarantee that the browser is IE, > > soEdit is good. (It really just utilizes native browser functionality) >

RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-01 Thread BillyC
Siteobjects.com --- Billy Cravens -Original Message- From: Pardeep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 4:44 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro Does anyone know the URL to take a look at soEditor? - Original Message

Re: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-01 Thread Pardeep
Does anyone know the URL to take a look at soEditor? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 2:15 PM Subject: RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro > For decent functionality wh

RE: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-01 Thread BillyC
For decent functionality when you can guarantee that the browser is IE, soEdit is good. (It really just utilizes native browser functionality) However, eWebEdit supports Netscape (Java?) and has a pretty rich JavaScript API you can program against (among many other flexible features). Functional

Re: SiteObjec soEditor vs. Ektron eWebEdit Pro

2002-05-01 Thread Paul Giesenhagen
I haven't used it as much as ewebeditpro, but the little I have, I like it alot better. It seems that Ewebeditpro has got just to much overhead .. seems very klunky compared to their version back in 1.5 era. Paul Giesenhagen QuillDesign http://www.quilldesign.com SiteDirector Commerce Builde