RE: WDDX for Cobol

2001-01-10 Thread Robert Everland
Well if you have Client access to connect to the AS/400 and it's using an offshoot of DB2 somewhere which AS/400 usually uses, you should be able to query the database with an odbc connection. We do this now with AS/400 and RPG. Robert Everland III Web Developer Dixon Ticonderoga -Original

RE: WDDX for Cobol

2001-01-10 Thread Simon Horwith
I've not heard of this, but one thing you might want to do is either write or search for a java class to do this. If your OS400 version is less than 5 years old, then it should have a local JVM that you could interface with. Java has excellent XML parsing capabilities, and would be the ideal

Re: WDDX for Cobol

2001-01-10 Thread David E. Crawford
in Java just aren't what they are in CF. DC - Original Message - From: "Robert Everland" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "CF-Talk" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 10:04 Subject: RE: WDDX for Cobol Well if you have Client access to connect to the AS/400 and it'

RE: WDDX for Cobol

2001-01-10 Thread Russel Madere
bear eats you. -Original Message- From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 09:05 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: WDDX for Cobol Well if you have Client access to connect to the AS/400 and

RE: WDDX for Cobol

2001-01-10 Thread Russel Madere
you eat the bear; some days the bear eats you. -Original Message- From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2001 09:37 To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: WDDX for Cobol Is it faster? We

RE: WDDX for Cobol

2001-01-10 Thread JustinMacCarthy
3:10 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: WDDX for Cobol In production we will not have ODBC connectivity to the database, but will only be calling a stored procedure which executes a COBOL routine. Right now I am getting a huge string back, delimited by the | character. The downside is that the client