RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-31 Thread Calvin Ward
I just wish it has a sweet price! Calvin -Original Message- From: Mike Nimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? Honestly though if you're tweaking your forms so much that these keywords are becomi

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
st 30, 2005 11:34 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? Kevin, As Mike mentioned - altering the flex engine would result in 2 separate sets of code, 1 for CF and one for regular Flex. It's not a speed issue. It's a maintenance and restriction issue. Altering the flex compil

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Mark A Kruger
ough to be really useful. Folks like us just backtrack and use a pure flash UI with remoting and side step the whole issue. -Mark -Original Message- From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:13 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? What

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
t: Re: What were they thinking? Could you not provide a way to escape the characters? Im really sort of surprised there isnt already something like this in actionscript. On 8/30/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Presumably because of eval()? I have to say, I'm kind

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Ryan Guill
Could you not provide a way to escape the characters? Im really sort of surprised there isnt already something like this in actionscript. On 8/30/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Presumably because of eval()? I have to say, I'm kind of glad I > haven't played with flash forms muc

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Kevin Aebig
es quite easily than, instead of having to recreate the same forms (or steal them though outside means which just feels wrong...) Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Mike Nimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 30, 2005 10:36 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? I j

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Barney Boisvert
Presumably because of eval()? I have to say, I'm kind of glad I haven't played with flash forms much, because if I can't use "delete" in there, that'd drive me friggin' batty, as deletion is a pretty common thing to do. cheers, barneyb On 8/30/05, Mike Nimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That doe

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Mike Nimer
PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: What were they thinking? Does the subArray.push("Ne" + "w York") trick I proposed earlier not work? I haven't tried it (never even made a basic flash form), but it ought to, eh? cheers, barneyb On 8/30/05, Mike Nimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Paul Hastings
Mike Nimer wrote: > that does overlap sometimes. Honestly though if you're tweaking your > forms so much that these keywords are becoming an issue. You might want > to seriously look at Flex, it is a sweet tool. don't know that doing an alert("new mail arrived") or having a tooltip "delete folde

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Barney Boisvert
Does the subArray.push("Ne" + "w York") trick I proposed earlier not work? I haven't tried it (never even made a basic flash form), but it ought to, eh? cheers, barneyb On 8/30/05, Mike Nimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One more thing that might help. I know this is a workaround but if you > ne

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Mike Nimer
ork'); or in a label you can do this. Hth, ---nimer -Original Message- From: Mike Nimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:36 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? I just posted on Mark's blog, that yes as some of you guessed, we do perf

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Mike Nimer
I just posted on Mark's blog, that yes as some of you guessed, we do perform a regex check against the Actionscript to check for illegal usage of Actionscript, instead of using the compiler. This is why we can't tell the difference between comments, strings, or Actionscript. I know this is a pain,

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-30 Thread Mark A Kruger
btools.com www.necfug.com http://mkruger.cfwebtools.com -Original Message- From: Paul Hastings [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 1:12 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: What were they thinking? Mark A Kruger wrote: > Tyler - since I didn't see it blogged anywhere (not tha

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Paul Hastings
Mark A Kruger wrote: > Tyler - since I didn't see it blogged anywhere (not that I looked hard) I > blogged this issue: both ryan guill & i blogged this before (ryan was first, i missed his post): http://www.ryanguill.com/blog/index.cfm?mode=entry&entry=9CC49997-40CA-6D1C-8AE1F78717FA3812 http://ww

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Mark A Kruger
Tyler - since I didn't see it blogged anywhere (not that I looked hard) I blogged this issue: http://mkruger.cfwebtools.com -mk -Original Message- From: Tyler Clendenin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 6:26 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thi

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Ryan Guill
eplacing all instances of "New" with "n3w" hahaha. > > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:37 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: What were they thinking? > > As a matter of reference,

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Tyler Clendenin
I'll try this one out in the morning but I don't think it will work. For now I am just replacing all instances of "New" with "n3w" hahaha. -Original Message- From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 4:37 PM To: CF-Ta

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Mark A Kruger
ust 29, 2005 4:26 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? "Key word checking shouldn't apply to strings." Shouldn't and don't are 2 different things. I am surprised with this bug though as the word "new" is used tons of times in every admin tool

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Kevin Aebig
: Mark A Kruger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 29, 2005 2:53 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: What were they thinking? Tyler, So you are saying push("tampa") works and push('New York') Does not work? That is wrong. Key word checking shouldn't apply to strings. -Marks

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Ryan Guill
No, thats right. Any string or code in actionscript cannot contain the word new. This goes for labels in elements as well. will throw an error as well... On 8/29/05, Mark A Kruger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tyler, > > So you are saying push("tampa") works and push('New York') Does not work?

Re: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Barney Boisvert
or split it up: subArray.push("Ne" + "w York"); cheers, barneyb On 8/29/05, Kevin Aebig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As a matter of reference, you might be able to trick the Coldfusion AS > compiler into doing it for you if you do this: > > subArray.push({label:"New York"}); > > Cheers, > > Ke

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Mark A Kruger
Tyler, So you are saying push("tampa") works and push('New York') Does not work? That is wrong. Key word checking shouldn't apply to strings. -Marks -Original Message- From: Tyler Clendenin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 29, 2005 2:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: What were th

RE: What were they thinking?

2005-08-29 Thread Kevin Aebig
As a matter of reference, you might be able to trick the Coldfusion AS compiler into doing it for you if you do this: subArray.push({label:"New York"}); Cheers, Kevin -Original Message- From: Tyler Clendenin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: August 29, 2005 1:59 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: W