Re: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Greg Morphis
I'd just store it as a text.. another option would be to store it as a number and use CF to format it correctly On 1/3/06, Brian Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a CF application I'm working on and part of the application has entry of phone numbers. I think this may be related more to

Re: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread John Wilker
I don't think you can make an INT field take leading 0's Not sure if any numeric field will take leading 0's Been down that road, I went with varchars for my phone fields. J On 1/3/06, Brian Coleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have a CF application I'm working on and part of the application

RE: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Dave Watts
My phone fields are broken up into 3 parts, area code, prefix and phone number. Each of those sections are a field in the DB, so 3 fields for a phone number. The fields are integer type. Phone number fields should be character data, not numeric. You should only use numeric fields for values

RE: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: phone numbers in database My phone fields are broken up into 3 parts, area code, prefix and phone number. Each of those sections are a field in the DB, so 3 fields for a phone number. The fields are integer type. Phone number fields

RE: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Dave Watts
The only issue with that would be sorting them numerically versus alphabetically 0 1 10 2 20 3 30 Would be what youd get with these numbers alphabetically instead of numerically... If they're phone numbers, I suspect they all have the same number of digits, so I don't see why that

RE: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
If they are all US numbers that would most likely be true. ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:29 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: phone numbers

RE: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Bobby Hartsfield
: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:41 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: phone numbers in database If they are all US numbers that would most likely be true. ...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:. Bobby Hartsfield http://acoderslife.com -Original Message- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Coleman, Brian
] Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:03 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: phone numbers in database But then again, I guess he would have said there was a 4th field for a possible country code so you're probably right... It would sort fine either way. If they are all in fact 3, 3 and 4 digits you could

RE: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Cornillon, Matthieu \(Consultant\)
-Talk Subject: RE: phone numbers in database That is true, they are all US numbers and the same type of digits. I doubt they'd ever do any kind of searches on them. I think I'll switch it to be 1 field of text and slightly change the way it's entered. Thanks All -Original Message- From

Re: phone numbers in database

2006-01-03 Thread Jochem van Dieten
Brian Coleman wrote: My phone fields are broken up into 3 parts, area code, prefix and phone number. Each of those sections are a field in the DB, so 3 fields for a phone number. The fields are integer type. Let's see how that would work with my phone number: +31 10 75 01888 991 | | |