Re: REPOST: Redundancy Options

2005-12-16 Thread Thomas Chiverton
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 14:38, Rick Root wrote: > Doesn't anyone have any comments on failover/redundancy in a coldfusion > environment? You answered your own question in the last paragraph of your post. By two of everything and a pair of load balancers. -- Tom Chiverton Advanced ColdFus

Re: REPOST: Redundancy Options

2005-12-07 Thread Douglas Knudsen
I've been involved with hardware solutions some by putting a load balancer in front of two servers running CF. The loadbalancer can determine if a server is down and direct all traffic to the other server if it is up. I have also setup JRun clusters for software based LB and failover. But so far

Re: REPOST: Redundancy Options

2005-12-07 Thread Dave Carabetta
On 12/7/05, Rick Root <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm getting suspicious because this is the third message I've sent to > the list in the last few weeks that generated no responses whatsoever. > Doesn't anyone have any comments on failover/redundancy in a coldfusion > environment? > Rick, We run

Re: REPOST: Redundancy Options

2005-12-07 Thread James Holmes
Agreed - we are about to implement rules on a Cisco Content Services Switch to do this in a failover config with our two prod servers. We could also go for load balancing with sticky sessions but this means we would have hassles with APPLICATION scope variables and a couple of other things. On 12/

REPOST: Redundancy Options

2005-12-07 Thread Rick Root
I'm getting suspicious because this is the third message I've sent to the list in the last few weeks that generated no responses whatsoever. Doesn't anyone have any comments on failover/redundancy in a coldfusion environment? Rick Root wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been asked to investigate option