Snake wrote:
> So do u still get a cfadmin if u do this ?
Depends. If the ISV includes it in his distribution and makes it accessible you
get it, otherwise you don't. Our preferred scenario is to include a cfadmin but
only make it accessible through the built-in webserver.
Jochem
So do u still get a cfadmin if u do this ?
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 January 2007 11:20
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RFC: CFMX Runtime Server
AJ Mercer wrote:
> If the EAR contains the CF engine, wouldn't this require a lic
AJ Mercer wrote:
> If the EAR contains the CF engine, wouldn't this require a license too (for
> each server it is deployed on)?
That is what the ISV does. He delivers a complete application that can be
deployed on any standard J2EE server with a license for X CPUs. The hosting
party does not ha
> I was think more along the lines of competing on a $ level.
Perhaps Adobe doesn't want to compete with free products. There's not much
money in it.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our tra
> If the EAR contains the CF engine, wouldn't this require a
> license too (for each server it is deployed on)?
Yes, it does.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
instruction at our training centers in Washin
PROTECTED]
> Sent: 05 January 2007 03:01
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: RFC: CFMX Runtime Server
>
> Yep - something for Adobe to release - to compete with Railo/smith/BD.
>
>
> On 1/5/07, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >>
If the EAR contains the CF engine, wouldn't this require a license too (for
each server it is deployed on)?
On 1/6/07, Dave Watts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And how would they compile your CFML pages into Java ?
> > You need ColdFusion server for that.
>
> The EAR/WAR deployment option actua
Correct!
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 January 2007 18:46
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RFC: CFMX Runtime Server
Snake wrote:
> And how would they compile your CFML pages into Java ?
> You need ColdFusion server for that.
The developer
Snake wrote:
> And how would they compile your CFML pages into Java ?
> You need ColdFusion server for that.
The developer needs CF to create the EAR file. At the place you are deploying
all you need is a J2EE server.
Jochem
~
> And how would they compile your CFML pages into Java ?
> You need ColdFusion server for that.
The EAR/WAR deployment option actually includes the entire ColdFusion
server. With the sourceless deployment, you don't need to compile anything
anyway - it's precompiled. But you do need the CF runtime
And how would they compile your CFML pages into Java ?
You need ColdFusion server for that.
-Original Message-
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 January 2007 15:24
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RFC: CFMX Runtime Server
Snake wrote:
> I believe you need C
Snake wrote:
> I believe you need CFMX Enterprise to actually do the sourceless deployment
> though.
No, you need a J2EE server (like the free JBoss and Glassfish) or a Servlet
engine (like Tomcat).
Jochem
~|
Create robust ente
: Re: RFC: CFMX Runtime Server
OK, well working on that basis - what is to stop me from buying only one
server for building my WAR files and deploying them to a whole host of j2ee
containers in my test and production environments? Even more than that, do
I even have to pay for CFMX is dev edition is
They already have something to complete with Railo/Smith/BD
Its called ColdFusion MX
Russ
-Original Message-
From: AJ Mercer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 05 January 2007 03:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: RFC: CFMX Runtime Server
Yep - something for Adobe to release - to compete with
Neil Middleton wrote:
> OK, well working on that basis - what is to stop me from buying only one
> server for building my WAR files and deploying them to a whole host of j2ee
> containers in my test and production environments?
Your professional ethic. Just like your professional ethic is stopping
OK, well working on that basis - what is to stop me from buying only one
server for building my WAR files and deploying them to a whole host of j2ee
containers in my test and production environments? Even more than that, do
I even have to pay for CFMX is dev edition is free (assuming it can also d
AJ Mercer wrote:
> you mean something like tomcat or jBoss?
Yes.
Jochem
~|
Create robust enterprise, web RIAs.
Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.ado
you mean something like tomcat or jBoss?
I was wonder if that was possible.
On 1/5/07, Jochem van Dieten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> AJ Mercer wrote:
> > I have an idea for a free ColdFusion server product that would I like to
> put
> > out there for discussion : A CF runtime server
> >
> > Th
AJ Mercer wrote:
> I have an idea for a free ColdFusion server product that would I like to put
> out there for discussion : A CF runtime server
>
> The runtime server is like the CF server, but with no compiler.
> You develop and compile your web application on a licensed product, and then
> pack
Yep - something for Adobe to release - to compete with Railo/smith/BD.
On 1/5/07, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>I guess the free/trail developer edition should not be able to
> produce the
> package that can be deployed to the runtime version.
>
> Oh, your idea is that Adobe
>>I guess the free/trail developer edition should not be able to
produce the
package that can be deployed to the runtime version.
Oh, your idea is that Adobe would develop this tool? I thought you had
this idea for yourself ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom
I guess the free/trail developer edition should not be able to produce the
package that can be deployed to the runtime version.
On 1/5/07, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>and Adobe would still get to sell licenses.
>
> No so sure about that, since the run time must be produced b
>>and Adobe would still get to sell licenses.
No so sure about that, since the run time must be produced by some
developer, and the developer version is free.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm
(P
I have an idea for a free ColdFusion server product that would I like to put
out there for discussion : A CF runtime server
The runtime server is like the CF server, but with no compiler.
You develop and compile your web application on a licensed product, and then
package it up as a sourceless dep
24 matches
Mail list logo
