. 3.2 will also see the Vivio installers become the official Railo
installers so folks who like simple click-click-done installers
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting new people to the CF open source, if not many open
source
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting new people to the CF open source,
Very good point.
Even if CF cannot be qualified as easy to install either.
~|
Order the Adobe
Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting new people to the CF open source,
Very good point.
Even if CF cannot be qualified as easy to install either
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:49 PM, UXB denn...@uxbinternet.com wrote:
. 3.2 will also see the Vivio installers become the official Railo
installers so folks who like simple click-click-done installers
This, the lack of simple installation, in my opinion is the biggest
impediment to attracting
It sounds like it's a first impression problem. Which is ironically what CF
has suffered from since day one. Many still scoff at CF based on a first
impression they got about it in the 90's or early 00's. Sadly people who
have tried it and been disappointed (be it CF, Railo or whatever
else)
-talk@houseoffusion.com
Subject: Re: What Notable Differences are there between Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:10:19 -0500
From: mgr...@modus.bz
It sounds like it's a first impression problem. Which is ironically what CF
has
you may also find this comparison helpful.
http://www.cfmldeveloper.com/page.cfm/coldfusion-vs-railo-1
Russ
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Lesko m.le...@verizon.net wrote:
I tried to give a test to Railo some months ago.
The lack of documentation made me give up after a few days.
I finally upgraded to CF 9.
Documentation is the most important thing for developers.
For the same reason, I hate Mozilla.
It may be many times better than Explorer, but their
Wow, this is incredible. You hate open source and free stuff?
Really? I've used plenty of commercial software with crappy
documentation. Open source, or free, does not automatically equal
crappy documentation. And what kind of docs are you looking for in
your browser?
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010
Open source, or free, does not automatically equal crappy documentation.
At least for the two examples I gave, YES!
And what kind of docs are you looking for in your browser?
Mostly Javascript and CSS.
As far as HTML is concerned, there are not really differences.
you may also find this comparison helpful.
http://www.cfmldeveloper.com/page.cfm/coldfusion-vs-railo-1
Russ
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Matthew Lesko m.le...@verizon.net
wrote:
Thanks I've added this to an answer on the site. Comments are just as
interesting as the actual
I tried to give a test to Railo some months ago.
The lack of documentation made me give up after a few days.
I finally upgraded to CF 9.
Documentation is the most important thing for developers.
For the same reason, I hate Mozilla.
It may be many times better than Explorer, but their
December 2010 15:21
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What Notable Differences are there between Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
I tried to give a test to Railo some months ago.
The lack of documentation made me give up after a few days.
I finally upgraded to CF 9
When it comes to CFML programming the docs for Railo
is pretty much the same as ColdFusion.
Pretty much, until you find something that works under CF and does not under
Railo.
Most of the time, it is only a detail, but it can cost you hours.
The least would be some good docs about what's in
There are docs on the Railo site which details exactly what is and isn't
supported across the different platforms.
I use Railo, I find is a great alternative for most of my clients. - Then
again, we develop in multiple languages, so to me, it's just another
language to know the difference in
http://www.getrailo.org/index.cfm/documentation/compatibility/cfml-compatibility/
--
WSS4CF - WS-Security framework for CF
http://wss4cf.riaforge.org/
On 21 December 2010 01:20, wrote:
The least would be some good docs about what's in CF and is not in Railo, and
vice versa.
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:20 AM, wrote:
In Gmail, this post seems to be from an anonymous user...
I hate those open source or free stuff.
...so I visited the HoF site and I see it's Claude Schneegans, in
which case the negativity makes perfect sense.
The more undocumented free gadgets on
=E9egans schneeg...@interneti=71?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?ue.com=3E?=]
Sent: 20 December 2010 17:20
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: What Notable Differences are there between Railo, Open
Bluedragon, and Adobe Coldfusion? [Stackoverflow.com]
When it comes to CFML programming the docs for Railo
is pretty much
18 matches
Mail list logo
