Ian Lurie wrote:
Thought of that, but no stored procs, no triggers, no OLAP, and not nearly
the performance for database-side UDFs, either.
Firebird http://firebird.sourceforge.net/
PostgreSQL http://www.postgresql.org/
SAPDBhttp://www.sapdb.org/
Plenty of options available.
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: SQL lisence headaches
until you need stored procs and triggers ;-)
Bryan Stevenson
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
p. 250.920.8830
e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Macromedia Associate
Message-
From: Bud [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 7:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL lisence headaches
On 3/26/02, Ian Lurie penned:
Any opinions out there on running SQL on a single proc machine? Is it worth
it? I've got a site that'll likely get 40,000+ visits in 1-2
Hi all,
Can someone out there explain Microsoft's SQL license scheme? I have a
freakin' law degree and I can't figure it out.
Do I need to buy a 2-processor license for a dual-proc web server? Or is a
CAL license enough?
I guess I'm wondering if my ColdFusion box counts as one CAL, or whether
Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: SQL lisence headaches
Hi all,
Can someone out there explain Microsoft's SQL license scheme? I have a
freakin' law degree
]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: SQL lisence headaches
Hi all,
Can someone out there explain Microsoft's SQL license scheme? I have a
freakin' law degree and I can't figure it out.
Do I need to buy a 2-processor license for a dual-proc web server? Or is a
CAL license
Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: SQL lisence headaches
Hi all,
Can someone out there explain Microsoft's SQL license scheme? I have a
freakin
Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 5:03 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: OT: SQL lisence headaches
Hi all,
Can someone out there explain Microsoft's SQL license scheme? I have
...
-Original Message-
From: Robert Everland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 2:06 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL lisence headaches
Do not buy a cal with it becuase you will need to buy a cal for every web
visitor you have, and since you will never know how many
-
Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
Founder Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Cary Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: SQL lisence headaches
We
On 3/26/02, Ian Lurie penned:
Hi all,
Can someone out there explain Microsoft's SQL license scheme? I have a
freakin' law degree and I can't figure it out.
Do I need to buy a 2-processor license for a dual-proc web server? Or is a
CAL license enough?
I guess I'm wondering if my ColdFusion box
On 3/26/02, Robert Everland penned:
Do not buy a cal with it becuase you will need to buy a cal for every web
visitor you have, and since you will never know how many vistors you get
you'll end up being in violation of it. You can get a one processor license
as long as you limit the processors in
On 3/26/02, Ian Lurie penned:
Any opinions out there on running SQL on a single proc machine? Is it worth
it? I've got a site that'll likely get 40,000+ visits in 1-2 months...
I've got 2000 running on a single PIII 833 MZ processor with 512 MB
RAM. About 15 databases thus far, doing probably
Thought of that, but no stored procs, no triggers, no OLAP, and not nearly
the performance for database-side UDFs, either.
-Original Message-
From: Cary Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: SQL lisence headaches
We
-
From: Cary Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 3:27 PM
Subject: RE: SQL lisence headaches
We are migrating almost everything to MySQL (CF/Apache) on Linux. We don't
need no stinkin processor licenses
: SQL lisence headaches
That would be true were we running applications where stored procedures and
triggers are absolutely necessary. The reality for most of the world is
that, while they are useful, they are far from necessary.
For the others, we will keep our behemoth SQL 2k server
16 matches
Mail list logo