of other items
from their site matching an internal search result using that criteria.
I know that many search engines send the original search query over to the
website I am assuming in the header because I can obtain that information
from the web-server log reports. What I don't know
-talk
Subject: Query Results sent from search engines CGI variable?
I have a client who wants to make their site more user friendly when someone
is sent to them from a search engine. What they want is when someone comes
from a search engine link that we obtain the original search query (if sent
What I don't know is if it is available in
the CGI variables Cold Fusion can get from IIS6.
The few times I've had to do this I parsed out the original query from the
CGI.HTTP_Referer variable (URL string of the page that linked to yours).
The format is slightly different depending on which
the requested page present a list of other items
from their site matching an internal search result using that criteria.
I know that many search engines send the original search query over to the
website I am assuming in the header because I can obtain that information
from the web-server log
present a list of other items
from their site matching an internal search result using that criteria.
I know that many search engines send the original search query over to the
website I am assuming in the header because I can obtain that information
from the web-server log reports. What I don't
Hi, all.
I've been using Advanced Web Ranking for a few years, and while it works
well, I'd like to expand
on its capabilities, well, its output, anyway.
I was wondering if anyone has been using CF to rank websites according to
keywords/keyphrases,
particularly on Google, Yahoo, and
I am having some instability issues with my coldFusion server. What I think is
happening is that search enginge bots are going through pages that require a
variable for example but being it doesn't have it, it creates an error that say
ID isn't defined for example. This fills up application.log
I am having some instability issues with my coldFusion server. What I
think is happening is that search enginge bots are going through pages that
require a variable for example but being it doesn't have it, it creates an
error that say ID isn't defined for example. This fills up
I am having some instability issues with my coldFusion server. What I think is
happening is that search enginge bots are going through pages that require a
variable for example but being it doesn't have it, it creates an error that say
ID isn't defined for example. This fills up application.log
Example URL:
http://www.karatekorner.com/dsp_LargeImage.cfm?imagename=217272lproducttitl
e=Adidas%20Merrit%20Sling
I have popup windows on my site that display large product photos that have
been indexed by search engines. The thing is, when a customer is refered by
a search engine by one
I have popup windows on my site that display large product
photos that have been indexed by search engines. The thing
is, when a customer is refered by a search engine by one of
these indexed popup windows pages, the page does not 'render'
like a pop up window if the customer was already
Dave, the JS function to launch the new window is below. Would might code
look like on the popup (child) page to do this? I'm not a JS pro by any
means. Thanks, Che.
script language=JavaScript
function NewWindow(mypage, myname, w, h, scroll) {
var winl = (screen.width - w) / 2;
var wint =
Dave, the JS function to launch the new window is below.
Would might code look like on the popup (child) page to do
this? I'm not a JS pro by any means. Thanks, Che.
The code would depend on what exactly you want as a result, of course, but
if you just wanted to conditionally hide the close
12:42 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing of javascript popup windows
Dave, the JS function to launch the new window is below.
Would might code look like on the popup (child) page to do
this? I'm not a JS pro by any means. Thanks, Che.
The code would depend on what exactly
Hmmm, I should have been more specific. How about...
if window opener is defined
show page as a normal popup
if not
redirect to a a specific page. say www.domain.com
You could simply replace the contents of the conditional block with whatever
you want to do:
if (!window.opener)
Dave, using your code, what I have below works in Firefox, but not IE. Any
ideas? Thanks a bunch, Che.
script language=JavaScript!--
if (!window.opener) {
document.write('a href=\http://www.mydomain.com\;span
style=\font-family: Verdana; font-weight: Bold;\Purchase This Product at
Dave, using your code, what I have below works in Firefox,
but not IE. Any ideas? Thanks a bunch, Che.
script language=JavaScript!--
if (!window.opener) {
document.write('a href=\http://www.mydomain.com\;span
style=\font-family: Verdana; font-weight: Bold;\Purchase
This Product at
://www.shaftek.org/blog/archives/000300.html
~Che
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 3:57 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing of javascript popup windows
Dave, using your code, what I have below works in Firefox
The problem is that in IE, I still get the Close Window
button on the indexed popup page that comes from Google
instead of getting the hyperlink to purchase it from
'MyDomain.com'. I'll try removing the escape slashes.
An explicit comparison would probably work in both, then:
if
Nope. Oh well, it seems to work in all browsers except IE. That's better
than where I was before.
Thanks for your help.
~Che
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 4:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing
Nope. Oh well, it seems to work in all browsers except IE.
This will work in both IE7 and Firefox:
if (window.opener == null || window.opener == undefined) ...
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized
PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 5:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search Engines the indexing of javascript popup windows
Nope. Oh well, it seems to work in all browsers except IE.
This will work in both IE7 and Firefox:
if (window.opener == null || window.opener == undefined) ...
Dave
Should I submit a website with 2 languages twice to search engines, once for
each language?
i.e.
- www.domain.com
- www.domain.com?lang=fr
What about to DMOZ and other such directories? They have different
categories for non-english sites...
Cheers,
Baz
- www.domain.com?lang=fr
that URL may get ignored as it's a dynamic page (the ? tells the bots this).
I'd suggest a mod/isapi rewrite to adjust your URL to something like
www.domain.com/lang/fr
I'm not sure you need to submit once for each language (I would think not), but
just wanted to let
Well there are 2 options you can do. Do a subdomain for each language.
http://french.domain.com etc... , or just have a link with the flags of the
different countries so a user can choose a different language. The bots should
follow the links. I wouldn't worry too much about them not following
This may well start a big war here, but are dynamic URLs really a big
problem anymore for todays modern search engine? I have no evidence
either way, but it seems to me that they must have come up with some
kind of a workaround by now
Bryan Stevenson wrote:
- www.domain.com?lang=fr
This may well start a big war here, but are dynamic URLs really a big
problem anymore for todays modern search engine? I have no evidence
either way, but it seems to me that they must have come up with some
kind of a workaround by now
It is my understanding that the big search engines
Well there are 2 options you can do. Do a subdomain for
each language. http://french.domain.com etc... , or just
have a link with the flags of the different countries so a
user can choose a different language. The bots should
follow the links. I wouldn't worry too much about them not
Yep, Google indexes them pretty exactly the same as sites with SES
url's... which is why I'm glad I never bothered with the whole SES url
nonsense... A whole lot of hair-pulling for bupkiss. Plus if you want
SES url's, use mod rewrite or isapi rewrite. It's infinitely easier to
implement it there
Thanks for all the tips... it was my understanding too that search engines
play nice with URL vars - I'm not too sure why SES safe URLs are still
being talked about so often.
Also, just to be sure, I should translate all META keywords and descriptions
to each language, correct? You can have more
that URL may get ignored as it's a dynamic page
If it was so, almost all CF pages would be ignored.
What is ignored are pages called from forms, because they will certainly
cause an error
if no field are filled.
As far as there is a link from one language to another, both languages
should be
It is recommended to make each page including the meta tags be specfic to the
page's content. Do not spam the meta tags with a bunch of keywords. Just put
the main keywords and description to be things that describe the content of the
page.
Bob
Thus things like should work, but there may be a limit on how many
combinations are considered.
a href=www.adomain.com/catalog.cfm?item=0203color=red
As far as all the combinations are present in the page under the form of
a valid link.
I do not see why robots will ignore them.
After all, what
Robert Everland III wrote:
Well there are 2 options you can do. Do a subdomain for each language.
http://french.domain.com etc... , or just have a link with the flags of the
different countries so a user can choose a different language. The bots
no. never flags. don't scale will eventually
In this issue of ColdFusion conference and training news:
1. Fusebox and Frameworks Conference News - win a gig memory stick TODAY
2. Class and certification news
3. Optimizing FuseBox Applications for Search Engines interview with Jon Rowny
4. Managing Your Career as a Developer interview
Are there any best practices for search engine optimization when using
coldfusion?
What we are currently doing is setting up a site map of sorts that interlinks
our database of job types with a customized page. Essentially what the
intention here is that search engines will index these pages
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Search engines and CF
Are there any best practices for search engine optimization when using
coldfusion?
What we are currently doing is setting up a site map of sorts that
interlinks our database of job types with a customized page. Essentially
what the intention here
job of
that type, then google will see that the page has changed, keep re-indexing
it, and through that, re-index your customised pages.
-Original Message-
From: Protoculture [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2005 14:22
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Search engines and CF
Are there any
yep.
-Original Message-
From: Protoculture [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 June 2005 16:07
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Search engines and CF
Hey Kerry, so what you are saying is that changing the order of the links on
the site map will signal to google that the page has changed
]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: search engines
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers
as being a viable solution but wordpress just found out the hard way thats
not the way to go.
Google officials declined to comment
, April 04, 2005 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: search engines
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers
as being a viable solution but wordpress just found out the hard way thats
not the way to go.
Google officials declined to comment on why
that question...
Rick
-Original Message-
From: Marty Johll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 05, 2005 9:39 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: search engines
For more information, here's a slashdot article:
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/03/31/196220tid=217
On Apr 4, 2005 4
, April 05, 2005 9:45 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: search engines
Oh, and one other where Google punished an internal (Adwords) unit
for doing serving up different content to the bot vs user:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1774677,00.asp?kc=EWRSS03119TX1K594
Marty
On Apr 5, 2005 8:39 AM
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers as
being a viable solution but wordpress just found out the hard way thats not the
way to go.
Google officials declined to comment on why WordPress.org pages had dropped
from the company's index, but its Webmaster
Good to knowthanks for the heads up, Dave!
Rick
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 5:15 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: search engines
Someone brought up serving up different content to a bot then to the viewers
as being a viable
What are some strategies for removing references to old dynamically
generated pages from search engine indexes? The problem I run into is
that the CFM page will exist, it will execute, but the referenced data is
often expired.
A typical URL might look like:
PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 11:26 AM
Subject: How to remove dynamic content from search engines?
What are some strategies for removing references to old dynamically
generated pages from search engine indexes? The problem I run
from search engines?
.HTAccess file...or robots.txt
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web: www.electricedgesystems.com
- Original Message
search engines?
That sounds like a maintenance nightmare. We're talking about thousands
of entries over the course of a year or two. For example, news stories or
event postings might run a few days or months, then drop off. Many of the
records reference paid listings that can also be un-expired
: Thursday, February 03, 2005 3:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: How to remove dynamic content from search engines?
That sounds like a maintenance nightmare. We're talking about thousands
of entries over the course of a year or two. For example, news stories
or event postings might run a few days
If robots.txt entries aren't an available option, make all CF 404's
redirect to a certain page via CF's 404 handler. You can do the same
with IIS 404's. This can be an 'oops' page or it can just be a
redirect to the site's home page.
If the content is statically published and expired, I
dynamic content from search engines?
If robots.txt entries aren't an available option, make all CF 404's
redirect to a certain page via CF's 404 handler. You can do the same
with IIS 404's. This can be an 'oops' page or it can just be a
redirect to the site's home page.
If the content
I've got what I call 'pseudo-static' pages that are named like
http://www.mysite.com/invalidpage.cfm
but are in fact dynamic. Once they are deleted the aftermath is
handled by the 404 handler or by publishing a linkrot page that does a
redirect.
For your first example, I check for that ID
I can't back you up with data, but don't forget forms (value attributes
of input, option and content of textarea).
Pascal
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2004 06:10
To: CF-Talk
Subject: (OT?) White space and search engines
I'm
Hi Michael,
Less whitespace is always a good thing, but it's not really a big
issue for search engines. The code to content ratio (ie, efficiency
of html) is more of an issue, as is getting the relevant keyword-rich
content as close to the top of the page as possible. I guess what I'm
trying
Why not just enable HTTP compression on the web server?
-Kevin
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:10 PM
Subject: (OT?) White space and search engines
I'm giving a presentation on RegEx this Wed
it will make the page smaller
It will surely do, but may be not as much as one could think.
When one look at the source code of a page, one can be amazed by the percentage of white space,
sometimes it looks like 50% of the page is white space.
However the white space is mostly caused by tabs
Didn't think of those. Thanks.
_
From: Pascal Peters [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 3:57 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: (OT?) White space and search engines
I can't back you up with data, but don't forget forms (value attributes
of input, option and content
have limited experience with webserver based compressors.
_
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 06, 2004 8:56 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: (OT?) White space and search engines
Why not just enable HTTP compression on the web server?
-Kevin
- Original Message
Actually, it counts heavily on coding style. I like lots of space, indents
and the like in my code. You read my code and it's beautiful. This does add
extra material to the html source. Just look at an average archive page (go
to the link at bottom) and you'll see extra space.
_
it will
I like lots of space, indents and the like in my code.
Sure, it helps for readibility, but what I mean is that it does not take as many characters as the apparent space they generate.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See
AM
Subject: RE: (OT?) White space and search engines
http compression on a dynamic page? Yes, it'll make the stream faster but
the actual content is the same. Even with white space management turned
on,
CF has extra space that can't be removed by a web server based compression
engine (at least
Oh. I glossed over the SEO aspect. I don't recall anything about better
placement because of a single line. Erika would probably know though.
-Kevin
I'm under the
impression that if this is done, it will make the page smaller and
also increase the pages search engine position as it makes the
CF has a free gzip cfx thats been available for quite awhile.Works
great.You need cfx_GZip and cf_GZipPage.I've been running it on
its highest setting for years with no trouble.
--
--Matt Robertson--
MSB Designs, Inc.
mysecretbase.com
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast
I'm giving a presentation on RegEx this Wed. and one of the things
I'll be showing is a tight little piece of code that will compress a
webpage by removing all 'extra' spaces (and tabs, new lines, etc.)
from all places other than script and pre tags. I'm under the
impression that if this is done,
DEATH TO CODE READABILITY?!!!
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:10 PM
Subject: (OT?) White space and search engines
I'm giving a presentation on RegEx this Wed. and one of the things
I'll be showing is a tight little piece
. You'll have to take the tag out or uncompress
the html to debug it, but you'd only use the tag on finished code
anyway.
DEATH TO CODE READABILITY?!!!
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dinowitz
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2004 11:10 PM
Subject: (OT?) White space and search
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:41:17 -0400, Andrew Grosset [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is: will the search engines follow that link to the final destination and
would cflocation be best used or a meta refresh in the link_counter.cfm page?
As I understand it, that won't work very well. Much
Many thanks, that's an excellent idea.
regards, Andrew.
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:41:17 -0400, Andrew Grosset [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com wrote:
My question is: will the search engines follow that link to the
final destination and
would cflocation be best used or a meta refresh
ColdFusion Users Group
Founder Director
www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
- Original Message -
From: Andrew Grosset
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: counting clicks on links - search engines
Many thanks, that's an excellent idea.
regards, Andrew.
On Wed, 14 Jul
on links - search engines
Many thanks, that's an excellent idea.
regards, Andrew.
On Wed, 14 Jul 2004 18:41:17 -0400, Andrew Grosset [EMAIL PROTECTED]
com wrote:
My question is: will the search engines follow that link to the
final destination and
would cflocation be best used or a meta
good...but I'd run it by an SEO pro to be sure.It is possible for that approach to be viewed by the search engines as misleading.I say this because the href and the onClick go to different places (even though the user/spider/robot all get sent to example.com).
I would liken this to having a text
Links on page go to a template that calls database adds 1 click
and redirects to correct page etc etc.
My question is: will the search engines follow that link to the final destination and would cflocation be best used or a meta refresh in the link_counter.cfm page?
a href="" of
I use a udf to create all of my links (i.e. createLink(myLink), in order to
append cfid/cftoken to every url.However, I don't want search engines to
index my sites with a cfid/cftoken.Any way around this?
Thanks,
Brad
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe
On Friday 19 Mar 2004 13:22 pm, Brad Roberts wrote:
append cfid/cftoken to every url.However, I don't want search engines to
index my sites with a cfid/cftoken.Any way around this?
Check the browser string and do something different if it's a spider.
--
Tom Chiverton
Advanced ColdFusion
comprise a list of the top
crawlers, and if so, any suggestions on a list of (popular) words to test
against?
-Brad
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Chiverton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 8:40 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search Engines CFID/CFTOKEN
On Friday 19 Mar
at
the search engines) its for technicians and engineers who need to access
the technical manuals on the shop floor. As far as I know, the computers
will all be the same. I've passed along the question list to my friend.
Again thanks for your help.
larry
[Todays Threads]
[This Message
Larry,
Some of the critical questions to help you in your search.
1) Do you need to search locally from a CD/DVD or from a server?
2) In what file format is the manual (PDF, word docs, etc)
3) What will you use as your user interface for searching the manual (flash, HTML, etc)?
4) What is your
Greetings,
The company a friend of mine works for is starting to look at search
engines like Verity, Google, Altavista or DTSearch for searching as he
puts it:
they want to be able to search the IETM database (on their own server
for their DWAN, which they call a web server because it uses
,
The company a friend of mine works for is starting to look at search
engines like Verity, Google, Altavista or DTSearch for searching as he
puts it:
they want to be able to search the IETM database (on their own server
for their DWAN, which they call a web server because it uses the same
Jeremy Brodie wrote:
Larry,
This all depends on what you're trying to do and your budget. Here's
some information
1) Google is a 2u search appliance that you would fit on a rack. The
appliance runs into the thousands of dollars-- but then you're using
Google. Google is a document
, several of our clients would like
a search engine that displays the results by *section* of the website,
and then by relevance within those sections.
1) Does anyone know of a search engine that does this?
2) What other search engines do people use that they're happy with?
Kelly Tetterton
that displays the results by *section* of the website, and then by relevance within those sections.
1) Does anyone know of a search engine that does this?
2) What other search engines do people use that they're happy with?
Kelly Tetterton
duo | Technical Lead
One Web Company.
Twice the Results
engine
that displays the results by *section* of the website, and
then by relevance within those sections.
1) Does anyone know of a search engine that does this?
2) What other search engines do people use that they're happy
with?
I'm not familiar with FreeFind, but it seems to me that you
clients would like
a search engine that displays the results by *section* of the website,
and then by relevance within those sections.
1) Does anyone know of a search engine that does this?
2) What other search engines do people use that they're happy with?
Take a look at Atomz http
,
and then by relevance within those sections.
1) Does anyone know of a search engine that does this?
2) What other search engines do people use that they're happy with?
Kelly Tetterton
duo | Technical Lead
One Web Company.
Twice the Results.
312.224.9650 | main
312.224.9648 | direct
312.224.9651 | fax
I've bee doing some research on Search engines for dynamic sites... one
thing I've run across is this statement:
Reconfigure your Cold Fusion setup to replace the ? in a query string
with a '/' and pass the value to the URL.
I can understand how to do this programmatically, but what set up
No need to do that at all. It might have been true a LONG LONG time ago,
but all search engines can cope with dynamic urls these days. I wouldn't
bother.
Craig.
-Original Message-
From: Jim Gurfein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 September 2003 12:31
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Query String
I've got a shopping cart on a few sites where my original code passes the
order number on the URL.
Now, my system checks to see if an Order Number is passed on the URL, and
if so, checks
to see if it's older than 30 minutes old... if it is, I present a message
saying it's expired.
In the
We currently use the canned verity search features that come with CF 5, but we're
outgrowing it. Can anyone give me a few leads on alternative search engines other
than K2? I'd like a few options to explore. BTW, we're indexing text out of a
database, not pages on the site.
Thanks!
Ryan
have the document number
limitations that the bundled engine has.
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Search Engines
We currently use the canned verity search features that come with CF 5,
but we're
Ryan
What db are you using? If you're using SQL server - full text search may
be an option?
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2003 14:35
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Search Engines
We currently use the canned verity search features that come
Message -
From: Kola Oyedeji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 8:49 AM
Subject: RE: Search Engines
Ryan
What db are you using? If you're using SQL server - full text search may
be an option?
Kola
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto
.
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:35 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Search Engines
We currently use the canned verity search features that come with CF 5,
but we're outgrowing it. Can anyone give me a few leads on alternative
search
16, 2003 9:01 AM
Subject: RE: Search Engines
Hi Ryan,
We used to use verity but when we started indexing over 3million files
it got very slow indeed. We now use lucene to index flat files and
database content. If you are a java coder you can write your own cfx
interface to lucene
Hi Ryan,
We are accessing the database via jdbc, quering for the columns we need
and then indexing the returned data.
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2003 15:42
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Search Engines
Hey, Adam,
Thanks for the response
We use the trick of replacing the ampersands and question marks in a URL
with slashes in order to have our website indexed by search engines.
Instead of having the URL appear as:
MySite.cfm?VarName=Value
it appears as
MyPage.cfm/VarName/Value
This works extremely well in CF5 on IIS5 (patched
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 08:08 , MW wrote:
MyPage.cfm/VarName/Value
We are now configuring CFMX on a development server, and all of a sudden
it is broken.
In CFMX, CGI.PATH_INFO should contain /VarName/Value - I believe this is
slightly different behavior to CF5?
If you're not annoying
PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 5:08 PM
Subject: MX and URL trick for search engines
We use the trick of replacing the ampersands and question marks in a URL
with slashes in order to have our website indexed by search engines.
Instead of having the URL
See cfdev.com's products
-Original Message-
From: MW [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: MX and URL trick for search engines
We use the trick of replacing the ampersands and question marks in a URL
with slashes in order to have
1 - 100 of 168 matches
Mail list logo
