gt;>
> > >> On Thursday, January 2, 2003, at 09:34 AM, Ben
> Doom
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> One thing to think about: CF probably
> shouldn't
> > >> require one and only
> > >>> one
> > &
ECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
>
> Well, it's hard for us to know that you are interested in a feature if
> you don't submit a request for it. I don't consider submitting
fea
r it.
Matt Liotta
President & CEO
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.montarasoftware.com/
888-408-0900 x901
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Some idea about the
PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:13 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
>
>
> Um, no it's not. You just read on the mailing list what feature he is
trell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 1:59 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
>
> Well, it's hard for us to know that you are interested in a feature if
> you don't submit a request for it. I don't c
t;>> needed
>>> elsewhere, or it just makes the 'main' UDF easier
>> to read) and I
>>> generally
>>> include those subroutines in the same file. If I
>> had to have a
>>> separate
>>> file for each, it would be rather confu
ines in the same file. If I
> had to have a
> > separate
> > file for each, it would be rather confusing IMHO.
> >
> >
> > -- Ben Doom
> > Programmer & General Lackey
> > Moonbow Software, Inc
> >
> > -Original Message-
>
'I've' built a file system using cfcs and keeping in the cfscript syntax
instead of the tag based, and it's served me well. I understand the thoughts
of having a "mapping" or dedicated folder for udfs, . but how would that
fair with efficiency? I don't know the logistics of it, but seeing how ud
; -- Ben Doom
> Programmer & General Lackey
> Moonbow Software, Inc
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UD
D]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file, with the requirement that the file and
the function have the same name? Then you could call any
You might want to look at a suggested CFMX OOP design pattern posted
under the ColdFusion topic on http://www.benorama.com. I've been
experimenting with this recently and find it to be very clean and effective.
Cutter
Li Chunshen (Don) wrote:
>According to Macromedia's CFMX References on Using
ntrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 6:01 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
>
>
> Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
> expect one function per file, with the requirement that the f
> That's exactly what I have in my UDFlib directory and
> my thought of how it may work but of course it's up to
> MM to make it work as you described.
I think it's a good idea. Make sure you submit it at the URL I posted
earlier. All feature requests get reviewed before work on a new
versio
That's exactly what I have in my UDFlib directory and
my thought of how it may work but of course it's up to
MM to make it work as you described.
btw, you need to help me to push MM to fix some
problems as well, such as the Oracle8i driver and
request timeout. Matthew Walker's 2 UDF referrals are
ility.
> -Original Message-
> From: Christian Cantrell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, 2 January 2003 12:01 p.m.
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Some idea about the Efficiency of UDFs
>
>
> Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusio
Interesting idea. So how exactly would this work? Would ColdFusion
expect one function per file, with the requirement that the file and
the function have the same name? Then you could call any arbitrary
UDF, and the CF server would look in the proper directory for the right
file, then ex
According to Macromedia's CFMX References on Using
UDFs effectively:
"Consider the following techniques for making your
functions available to your ColdFusion pages:
If you consistently call a small number of UDFs,
consider putting their definitions on the
Application.cfm page.
If you call UDFs
17 matches
Mail list logo
