The Macromedia documentation is inconstant on this
point, and the migration guide as far as I can tell is
wrong.
There is a comment on livedocs re this
So, what is meant by the docs saying that MX
returns
structure keys in the order they are created as
opposed to
CF5 doing it alpha?
I am probably misunderstanding the MX docs regarding a structure's order.
MX returns structure keys in the order they are created. CF5 returned keys
in alpha order.
Am building a structure of Stallions from a query that has ORDER BY
SortOrder.
SortOrder is a number (byte) field in an Access
]
WWW : www.camdenfamily.com/morpheus
Yahoo IM : morpheus
My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is. - Yoda
-Original Message-
From: E. Keith Dodd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 12:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Structure order in MX
I am
Subject: RE: Structure order in MX
The reason you see different output when you use your manaul loop
compared to cfdump is that cfdump gets the keys and then sorts the keys.
===
Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master
So, if I want to have the structure keys (StallionCode in
this case) come out in my loop in the order I want tthem,
I'll have to do a new sort as I did in CF5? My ordering the
query by SortOrder before creating the structure isn't of
value then, right?
I'm a bit confused by what you
I'm sure you're right that that is what it means. But it doesn't behave that way.
The following code returns C, D, B.
cfset a = structNew()
cfset a.b = 1
cfset a.c = 2
cfset a.d = 3
cfloop collection=#a# item=k
cfoutput#k#/cfoutputbr
/cfloop
cfoutput#structKeyList(a)#/cfoutput
A
6 matches
Mail list logo
