It sounds kind of like you have this in a query...so you could use...
cfoutput query=myquery
#myquery[order-id][currentrow]#
/cfoutput
Yup, it was a query, and that fixed it, thanks.
--
Jay
~|
Introducing the Fusion
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Having queried this file how am I going to be able to refer to the field,
obviously #order-id# won't work as it will try to evaluate the var order
minus
Perhaps #order-id# would work. Referencing it as a string will
eliminate any chance of id being subtracted from order.
HTH,
-Aaron
On 11/16/06, James Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For
I'm a little unclear about the type of structure you're using, but
what about #['order-id']#?
On 11/16/06, James Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Having
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 11:27 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Stupid Field Names
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Having queried this file how am I going to be able
You could try something like
#Variables[order-id]#
or whatever scope they are in...
On 16/11/06, James Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Having
James Smith wrote:
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Having queried this file how am I going to be able to refer to the field,
obviously #order-id# won't work as it will try to
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have
labelled most of their fields with - in. For example
order-id and payments-date.
Having queried this file how am I going to be able to refer
to the field, obviously #order-id# won't work as it will try
to evaluate the var
Subject: Stupid Field Names
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Having queried this file how am I going to be able to refer to the field,
obviously #order-id# won't work as it will try
If it's a sql query you could select order-id as orderId etc
-Original Message-
From: Jim Wright [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2006 1:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Stupid Field Names
James Smith wrote:
While processing Amazon report files I notice
: Thursday, November 16, 2006 12:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Stupid Field Names
#variables['order-id']# MIGHT work. It allows you to have variables like
123myvar so give it a shot.
...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled
most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Probably the same moron who designed the CSS style names ;-)
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See
James Smith wrote:
While processing Amazon report files I notice that they have labelled most
of their fields with - in. For example order-id and payments-date.
Having queried this file how am I going to be able to refer to the field,
obviously #order-id# won't work as it will try to
13 matches
Mail list logo
