We tried that. Unfortunately we've just gotten the run around because
the sales people don't really know and they transfer us to the technical
people who (understandably) don't know. We've called 6 times and gotten
"Well I would think that..." for answers and gotten different answers
from each
> Well the license mentions that you're only allowed to use
> only 1 ip, yet we've heard from many sources and the physical
> product allows 2 ips. Are we violating the license if we
> access it from 2 different ips? Yes. Are the courts going
> to see it this way? I doubt it.
>
> The poi
Adobe? =P
!k
-Original Message-
From: Joelle Tegwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 16, 2006 3:27 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
I appreciate everyone weighing in on this including all the legal
nuances. Hopefully someone from Macromedia will respond
I appreciate everyone weighing in on this including all the legal
nuances. Hopefully someone from Macromedia will respond.
Joelle
Actually I would be surprised if any did. Do to the legalities of offering
legal opinions in an open forum such as this; they could get into a lot of
trouble.
I s
hat could be potentially dangerous, than deploy to a
Developer Edition and run it from there.
You don't pay for a legit license for just access, but convenience.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 16, 2006 2:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE:
I appreciate everyone weighing in on this including all the legal
nuances. Hopefully someone from Macromedia will respond.
Joelle
Russ wrote:
>Well the license mentions that you're only allowed to use only 1 ip, yet
>we've heard from many sources and the physical product allows 2 ips. Are we
>v
requests
are coming from another server and are proxied. I actually had to write a
filter to get CF to see the actual ip of the user.
Russ
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 4:03 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Sub
> Nobody is being cheap here. I'm sure everyone is paying some
> kind of fees for the production server. Either they have
> bought the licenses or are using hosting where they rent the
> licenses.
>
> People just want to develop in peace, and with the 2 ip
> restriction, that's not always p
> No, there's no mention of routers or proxies or any other workarounds in the
> license. Believe it or not, licenses, like any other legal documents, are
> meant to be interpreted reasonably. The license clearly states that you may
> only access the developer edition from one external IP address.
> how so Dave...it's just 1 IP and being used for development?
> Is there mention of router and othr devices in the licensing?
No, there's no mention of routers or proxies or any other workarounds in the
license. Believe it or not, licenses, like any other legal documents, are
meant to be interp
ursday, February 16, 2006 3:45 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: lincense on a test server?
>
> Than maybe they should should decide whether they want to be compatible or
> cheap... Beggars can't be choosers.
>
> !k
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Russ [mail
Than maybe they should should decide whether they want to be compatible or
cheap... Beggars can't be choosers.
!k
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 16, 2006 2:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: lincense on a test server?
It's also not very
Let me just state for legal reasons here that my company uses licensed
copies of CF for all of our dev servers.
We don't use developer edition anywhere.
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~|
It's also not very compatible with Macrodobe's coldfusion...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 3:16 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: lincense on a test server?
>
> Why not just use BlueD
Why not just use BlueDragon? Isn't that more generous with it's restrictions
for the free version?
Cheers,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Joelle Tegwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 16, 2006 12:07 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: lincense on a test server?
We're
< Checks the seat next to him for an Air Marshall >
> In that case maybe they can offer the official stance on this,
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:232563
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_l
In that case maybe they can offer the official stance on this, since the
EULA is not very clear...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Aebig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: lincense on a test server?
>
erver.
> -Original Message-
> From: Joelle Tegwen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 2:51 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
>
> Just to be clear on the developer edition is it
> - 2 IP addresses
> or
> - 2 IP address
51 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
>
> Just to be clear on the developer edition is it
> - 2 IP addresses
> or
> - 2 IP addresses at a time?
>
> We could use the method you suggest for all of our developers, but then
> we'd still occasionally
Just to be clear on the developer edition is it
- 2 IP addresses
or
- 2 IP addresses at a time?
We could use the method you suggest for all of our developers, but then
we'd still occasionally have non-developers looking at the site to see
how development is proceeding. Would that be ok?
Thanks
ursday, February 16, 2006 2:42 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
>
> Alan Rother wrote:
> > DevNet was cancelled a year ago.
>
> Well there ya go =)
>
> > Here is the basic rule of thumb, if it is possible to see the dev server
> >
Alan Rother wrote:
> DevNet was cancelled a year ago.
Well there ya go =)
> Here is the basic rule of thumb, if it is possible to see the dev server
> outside the building where it is housed, then yes you need at least the
> lowest posssible license. If it can only be accessed by developers in ho
Russ wrote:
> Well actually in CF7, it's restricted to localhost plus 2 other ips. But
> it's easy enough to get around :-P
Given the original question:
>>>Do we really need to buy a full additional license for our test server
>>>(which is only accessible wit
DevNet was cancelled a year ago.
Here is the basic rule of thumb, if it is possible to see the dev server
outside the building where it is housed, then yes you need at least the
lowest posssible license. If it can only be accessed by developers in house
on the local network then you might be able
ssage-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 16, 2006 1:01 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: lincense on a test server?
> Or even better, use the built in server, and setup apache on
> the same box to proxy the requests to the built in server...
> That'll show em :-P
> You may think I'm a prig for saying this, but I would strongly advise
> everyone not to discuss how to violate licenses on the list. Bad things can
> happen (and have) as a result.
not at all Dave...and my suggestion was only that...and you've since said it
would be a violation...now I just wan
> This would violate the license, of course.
how so Dave...it's just 1 IP and being used for development? Is there mention
of router and othr devices in the licensing?
TIA
Cheers
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.06
> Or even better, use the built in server, and setup apache on
> the same box to proxy the requests to the built in server...
> That'll show em :-P
You may think I'm a prig for saying this, but I would strongly advise
everyone not to discuss how to violate licenses on the list. Bad things can
ha
> We have a dual processor production server for which we will
> buy whatever appropriate license.
>
> Do we really need to buy a full additional license for our
> test server (which is only accessible within our organization)?
>
> Can we use the developer edition somehow?
> True enough Russ...so setup the server on another network and
> connect to it via router where all connections through that
> router are from a single IP ;-)
This would violate the license, of course.
Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
http://www.figleaf.com/
Fig Leaf Software provides the h
alk
> Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
>
> >I think the issue with this might be the limit on the # of ips that can
> > access it. There are only 2 ips allowed, and if you have a large team,
> this
> > can get problematic.
>
> True enough Russ...so setup the
> developer edition is IP restricted to localhost. so unless you're
> browser is running on the test server, that won't work.
umm..no it's 2 IPs...not localhost..last time I checked anyway
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge
Well actually in CF7, it's restricted to localhost plus 2 other ips. But
it's easy enough to get around :-P
> -Original Message-
> From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, February 16, 2006 1:20 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: lincense on a
>I think the issue with this might be the limit on the # of ips that can
> access it. There are only 2 ips allowed, and if you have a large team, this
> can get problematic.
True enough Russ...so setup the server on another network and connect to it via
router where all connections through that
Obviously, you'd be limited to the 1 IP address to access the Testing
server though. Not sure how you do testing, but it may not be the best
way to do it.
John Burns
Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
Wyle Laboratories, Inc. | Web Developer
ull additional license for our test server
> (which is only accessible within our organization)?
option 1 - yes.
Option 2 - a DevNet subscription came with a fully licensed copy for QA
and testing purposes. I suppose you could legally use that on a test
server.
But will DevNet continue
6 1:12 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: lincense on a test server?
>
> yes you can use the developer edition for commercial development (not to
> run
> anything commercial in prod)...unless Adobe has changed the rules ;-)
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director o
yes you can use the developer edition for commercial development (not to run
anything commercial in prod)...unless Adobe has changed the rules ;-)
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8
We're having trouble getting information from Adobe (since they
apparently know nothing about ColdFusion.)
We have a dual processor production server for which we will buy
whatever appropriate license.
Do we really need to buy a full additional license for our test server
(which is
test of a reply with a different subject.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:232492
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link
Ok, I've seen that to test a cf variable against null (from a java
method call that can return null), you have to do this:
x = someJavaObj.methodCall();
if (IsDefined('x")) {
//x is not null
} else {
// x is null
}
Is there no way to do this with a UDF, or somet
Just passing through...
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.375 / Virus Database: 267.15.2/251 - Release Date: 2/4/2006
~
test message
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230920
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http
test
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230690
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4
Unsubscribe: http
Hi,
If anyone has google talk installed on their machine and can spare a moment
to help test a gateway, please try this:
1. Add the user: groupchat
2. Type this command: /join coldfusion
3. Type any message
Thanks,
Baz
Pardon?
-Original Message-
From: Bobby Hartsfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 21:16
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Test for Jennifer
Seems to be fine now Jennifer. I'd like to thank everyone for ignoring this
thread.
...:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
-Talk
Subject: Re: Test for Jennifer
Oh come on now, they can't all be good jokes.
=]
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=
Oh come on now, they can't all be good jokes.
=]
--
Alan Rother
Macromedia Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX 7 Developer
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:230047
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/
You guys are just SAD... :o)
Rick
> -Original Message-
> From: Snake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 12:48 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Test for Jennifer
>
>
> You need to get out more.
> Or perhaps spend mor
You need to get out more.
Or perhaps spend more time on certain web sites :-)
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 16:38
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Test for Jennifer
Oh.
Sorry, I get excited when I hear we have a new lady on the list
: Test for Jennifer
rofl .. now now boys ;)
-Original Message-
From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 17:12
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Test for Jennifer
Hey Now!
I'm not sure this is the appropriate forum to be discussing Jennifer's
bounce!
=]
On 1/19
rofl .. now now boys ;)
-Original Message-
From: Alan Rother [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 17:12
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Test for Jennifer
Hey Now!
I'm not sure this is the appropriate forum to be discussing Jennifer's
bounce!
=]
On 1/19/06, Bobby
uick and I haven't
> seen one yet.
>
> ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
> Bobby Hartsfield
> http://acoderslife.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:38 AM
> To: CF-T
ECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 11:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Test for Jennifer
Oh.
Sorry, I get excited when I hear we have a new lady on the list. :)
I know you're not "new" now. Back to your regularly scheduled lives. :)
Jennifer Gavin-Wear wrote:
> Me ;)
>
a Jennifer, lol)
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 19 January 2006 16:29
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Test for Jennifer
>
>
> I ignore nothing!
>
> Who's Jennifer?
>
> Bobby Hartsfield w
Me ;)
where have you been Ray, I'm not exactly new here, lol
Jenny (aka Jennifer, lol)
-Original Message-
From: Ray Champagne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 January 2006 16:29
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Test for Jennifer
I ignore nothing!
Who's Jennifer?
Bobby Hartsf
I ignore nothing!
Who's Jennifer?
Bobby Hartsfield wrote:
> IGNORE THIS COMPLETELY! Just testing Jennifer's mail server settings.
>
> ..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
> Bobby Hartsfield
> http://acoderslife.com
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
IGNORE THIS COMPLETELY! Just testing Jennifer's mail server settings.
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:53 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: CF Debuggin
There was a small network issue in the beginning of the week but it was fixed
rather quickly. If you are having problems getting mail or know someone who is
(as they will probably not see this message), please contact me off list and
I'll try to find out what the issue is.
ocked on our mail server due to being on some
blacklists, but not sure why the posts all of a sudden came through last
night...
-Original Message-
From: Munson, Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 12:46 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: test
I've been getting
iginal Message -
> From: "Russ"
>
> > Wow... I sent this message months ago... it just came through now?
> >
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Russ
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:32 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> >
i only started getting posts again as well after some months
Paul Stewart
Site Developer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.whichfranchise.com
- Original Message -
From: "Russ" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk"
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 5:31 AM
Subject: RE: t
Wow... I sent this message months ago... it just came through now?
-Original Message-
From: Russ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 01, 2005 3:32 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: test
Is cf-talk down? I haven't received anything since sun mo
Is cf-talk down? I haven't received anything since sun morning.
~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:228418
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4
Subscription: http://www.houseoff
>>Notice that the two QoQ produce different results.
Ah ok, it is probabilly new with CFMX then, and I'll trust you :-)
I know that QoQ have been considerabily improved in CFMX.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customt
Or an easier way to explain it is that CF doesn't convert NULLs to empty
strings until it outputs them or uses them in an operation.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 December 2005 04:21
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: How to test for null
While you're right that CF doesn't understand NULLs, Java RecordSet
objects (or RowSet objects) do, and that's what backs a CF query
object. So the data's there, just CF can't access it. QofQ's are the
exception, because they operate on the backing object directly, not
via the CFML API, and so ca
CF is mostly typeless and mostly doesn't have a null. This all changes
in the Query Object, which keeps track of nulls and column types.
Test it for yourself; set up a table with a few rows; give each row a
PK and in a second column leave some cells null and for others insert
some strin
>>A QoQ with an IS NULL condition correctly returns rows with a null in
the column in CF 6.1
Hmmm, since AFAIK CF doesn't know the difference between a NULL and an
empty column in a query,
I'm not sure if it "correctly returns rows with a null in the column"
or if it "uncorrectly returns rows w
I always test these things before I post. A QoQ with an IS NULL
condition correctly returns rows with a null in the column in CF 6.1
On 12/28/05, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>You could do a Query of Queries to select rows where the chosen
> column IS NULL.
>>The join is a one-to-many relationship where
there can be 0 or more rows in the outer join to the main table.
I think in your case, you could just test for empty strings.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/cust
>>You could do a Query of Queries to select rows where the chosen
column IS NULL.
I don't think QofQ can handle null values, only empty strings, which are
not the same.
--
___
REUSE CODE! Use custom tags;
See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tags
;isNull()". In others, it may be
"coalesce()".
SELECT col1, COALESCE(col2, "{{NULL}}") AS col2
FROM table
WHERE join goes here
M!ked
-Original Message-
From: Chris Velevitch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 5:59 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subj
On 12/28/05, James Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could do a Query of Queries to select rows where the chosen column IS
> NULL.
Actually, I'm looping through each row in the query object and
building a structure. The join is a one-to-many relationship where
there can be 0 or more rows in
You could do a Query of Queries to select rows where the chosen column IS NULL.
On 12/28/05, Chris Velevitch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a query object created from a left outer join of 2 tables and I
> want to test to see if the values in the join result are null.
>
>
I have a query object created from a left outer join of 2 tables and I
want to test to see if the values in the join result are null.
How do I do this?
Chris
--
Chris Velevitch
Manager - Sydney Flash Platform Developers Group
www.flashdev.org.au
test
~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:223681
Arc
--
From: Brian "Vegas" Thornton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 7:29 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Want to test our Flex App?
Las Vegas based Global Training Technologies,Inc is please to offer our
employee training application for free for 30 days to those of
Universe Training Technologies has you beat with their patented
scientifically altered test results proven Ultra Whole Body Training.
lol...geesh, Super Whole Brain Learning? This discovered in Area 51 there?
On 11/4/05, Bobby Hartsfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 'Sup
'Super whole brain learning' You're kidding right? lol
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Brian Vegas Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 6:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Want to te
SPAM SPAM SPAM
-Original Message-
From: Brian Vegas Thornton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 04 November 2005 23:30
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Want to test our Flex App?
Las Vegas based Global Training Technologies,Inc is please to offer our
employee training application for free for 30 days
Las Vegas based Global Training Technologies,Inc is please to offer our
employee training application for free for 30 days to those of you CFers who'd
like to check out our App. The GTT learning platform uses the internet to train
and test employees in areas of Sexual Harassment and va
The in-reply-to is preserved in all of its incarnations (not all mail systems
use the same header) but I thought that the message id was a good idea as it
shows the message id in relation to the sender. Otherwise, you'll get a message
from [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a message id that says its from h
Actually, you (and Bob) got it backwards. You need to set it to
"Default" not "UTF-8" for some reason. With UTF-8 set, GMail uses
Base-64 encoding, which apparently is not relayed by the HoF servers,
period. I've never gotten posts from HoF back, but with UTF-8 set, my
posts didn't go to anyone
>>they assign a message id to the mail header (standard).
Indeed.
>>The House of Fusion list system was designed to respect that message
id and sends out all of the posts with a copy of it.
I'm not sure, THIS is not standard however, I think the sender (or
"resender") should define its own I
Just heard about that one as well. I'll be looking into a solution where spam
using base64 will still be blocked while legit posts will be allowed through.
A solution was posted here:
http://www.barneyb.com/blog/archives/000596.jsp
"have you tried changing the default outgoing message encoding f
Well that true, but also the utf-8 thing was keeping me from even
being able to post at all.
On 10/19/05, Michael Dinowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When you post from gmail, you do not get the message you send back. The
> reason for this is that when you post from gmail, they assign a message
When you post from gmail, you do not get the message you send back. The reason
for this is that when you post from gmail, they assign a message id to the mail
header (standard). The House of Fusion list system was designed to respect that
message id and sends out all of the posts with a copy of
I have been having trouble as well. Will someone reply to this off
list if you get this please?
On 10/19/05, Barney Boisvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A test from mine too. Can someone (bob?) please reply to me off-list
> if/when they get this?
>
> thanks,
> barneyb
A test from mine too. Can someone (bob?) please reply to me off-list
if/when they get this?
thanks,
barneyb
On 10/19/05, Bob Clingan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A test post from my gmail account.
>
--
Barney Boisvert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
360.319.6145
http://www.barneyb.com/
Got G
A test post from my gmail account.
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com
Yeah, I noticed the site was down after I posted that
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2005 2:17 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: Test
Network problem over
Network problem over Saturday. I'm not online from friday night to sat night so
I missed it. Once I got back online I called it in.
>Just testing. I havent seen my post come through yet.
>
>
>.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
>Bobby Hartsfield
>http://acoderslife.com
>
>
>--
>No virus found in thi
Just testing. I havent seen my post come through yet.
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.9/116 - Release Date: 9/30/2005
~
This is a test of the emergency cf-talk broadcast system. If it had been an
actual emergency, I wouldnt have taken the time to warn you. I'd be long
gone. What? I don't owe you anything...
..:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.
Bobby Hartsfield
http://acoderslife.com
--
No virus fou
Using URLEncodedFormat around the XML fixed the problem!
> I have been pulling my hair out [at least what is left] trying to get
> this USPS rate calculation test to work on BD JX 6.2 as this is my
> main development platform. I thought to try it on CF and see what
> happens and
I have been pulling my hair out [at least what is left] trying to get this USPS
rate calculation test to work on BD JX 6.2 as this is my main development
platform. I thought to try it on CF and see what happens and it fails on CF5,
but works on CFMX 6.1. So here are three links to show my test
; ==== code used to test
>
>
> http://testing.shippingapis.com/ShippingAPITest.
> dll?API=Rate&XML=Express2077020852100None>
Regular
>
>
>
>
>
> timeout="20">
>
>
>
>
>
>
~~~
I replaced USERID and PASSWORD with mine, your code worked fine.
Here is what I got in the cfhttp.FileContent
Express2077020852100NoneREGULAR133.65
code used to test
http://testing.shippingapis.com/ShippingAPITest.dll?API=Rate&XML=Express2077020852100NoneReg
After looking at your example, I see I posted the wrong test snippet. I should
have posted this one:
http://testing.shippingapis.com/ShippingAPITest.dll?API=Rate&XML=Express2077020852100NoneRegular
>
> I think the url of the cfhttp should look like this:
> http://testing.shi
301 - 400 of 1388 matches
Mail list logo
