I don't think that is accurate. Yes you can use array/struct functions
on them, but they are not array/structs. Consider this example:
cfxml variable=test
obs
users
name type=rootRay/name
nameFoo/name
/users
/obs
/cfxml
cfdump var=#test#
cfset node = test.obs.users.name[2]
Raymond,
From what I have experienced what is returned from XMLParse is indeed an
associate array, an array of structs, and your example doesn't use XMLParse.
So Justin is actually correct.
--
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+:
I repeated my test using xmlParse and got the same results.
cfsavecontent variable=test
obs
users
name type=rootRay/name
nameFoo/name
/users
/obs
/cfsavecontent
cfset test2 = xmlParse(test)
cfdump var=#test2#
cfset node = test2.obs.users.name[2]
Cool, well you maybe right.
--
Regards,
Andrew Scott
WebSite: http://www.andyscott.id.au/
Google+: http://plus.google.com/108193156965451149543
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.comwrote:
I repeated my test using xmlParse and got the same results.
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 6:03 AM, Justin Scott wrote:
When you use XMLParse(), the resulting variable is a set of arrays and
structures, so it's not just a lot like working with them, you
actually are,
What does that even mean in a typeless language?
The way I always explain it when doing CF
I don't think that is accurate. Yes you can use array/struct functions
on them, but they are not array/structs. Consider this example:
I saw your post and ran the code, and you are correct, CF is
representing them as an xml document rather than arrays and structs.
It's been a while since I
I'm working with XML for my first time and I ran
into an issue.
This is one of the Categories, Products, Product Details
hierarchies.
I've got everything figured out so far, but ran into a
product node which didn't contain what's called in the
document, a OneLiner child node. (Now, I was under
Yeah, thanks Rick, good tip. You'll find that working with CF XML nodes is
a lot like working with structs and arrays, so most of those array*() and
struct*() built-in functions will work with your XML.
nathan strutz
[www.dopefly.com] [hi.im/nathanstrutz] [about.me/nathanstrutz]
On Thu, Jan
Yeah, thanks Rick, good tip. You'll find that working with CF XML
nodes is a lot like working with structs and arrays, so most of
those array*() and struct*() built-in functions will work with your XML.
When you use XMLParse(), the resulting variable is a set of arrays and
structures, so it's
9 matches
Mail list logo
