Hi,
I usually add my custom code to CFML templates that return a lot of
records from a db query to add the paging functionality (next/previous
page buttons).
Is there any UDF or CFC that can be easily plugged into any CFML
template that requires paging functionality?
I checked the cflib.org
I've got one that I use. It's just a UDF. I'll send it to you off-list.
- Original Message -
From: xxx xxx [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk cf-talk@houseoffusion.com
Sent: Monday, January 31, 2005 12:37 PM
Subject: query paging UDF or CFC
Hi,
I usually add my custom code to CFML
Search for cfpagnation was a custom tag but I suspect with a little
tinkering could be made into udf or cfc. Works quite well and is pretty
flexable
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
a lot of
records from a db query to add the paging functionality (next/previous
page buttons).
Is there any UDF or CFC that can be easily plugged into any CFML
template that requires paging functionality?
I checked the cflib.org and cfczone.org web sites, but no luck.
Any hint to write my own
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 13:47:58 -0500, gabriel l smallman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Search for cfpagnation was a custom tag but I suspect with a little
tinkering could be made into udf or cfc. Works quite well and is pretty
flexable
Hi,
Are you sure of the name?
I cannot find it with Google
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 12:44:11 -0600, Deanna Schneider
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got one that I use. It's just a UDF. I'll send it to you off-list.
That would be great!
Thanks.
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion
Since I never liked the way REFind() handles matches (especially with
subexpressions), I wrote a UDF on top the java.util.regex package:
http://www.cfmentor.com/code/index.cfm?action="">
I also assembled a dedicated CFC:
http://www.cfmentor.com/code/index.cfm?action="">
This one instead is a
I'm wondering what the difference between a UDF and a CFC really are. Can't
I create UDF's which function just the same as a CFC with maybe a few
differences? Just pass the parameters in the function instead of using the
tag notation. Are there reasons why one would use a UDF instead of a CFC
PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 09:06:38 -0800
I'm wondering what the difference between a UDF and a CFC really
are. Can't
I create UDF's which function just the same as a CFC with maybe a
few
differences? Just pass the parameters in the function instead of
using the
tag notation. Are there reasons
CFCs are Macromedia's attempt to add some level of object oriented
programming to Coldfusion MX. One CFC does not equal one UDF. A CFC could
be though of as a collection of UDFs, although that is probably simplistic.
Where a UDF contains only one function, a CFC is more like a true Object
I agree with you Raymond.
But it is true that is more personal preference/coding style terms than
performance/architecture terms.
This are my personal rules :
CUSTOM TAGS (ColdFusion Taglibs)
- custom tags encapsulates presentation logic they always output content
(usually HTML),
- custom tags
- Original Message -
From: Benoit Hediard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: UDF Vs CFC (was RE: So many problems with CFC scopes...)
I agree with you Raymond.
But it is true that is more personal
www.benorama.com
-Message d'origine-
De : Gyrus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : lundi 30 septembre 2002 14:03
À : CF-Talk
Objet : Re: UDF Vs CFC (was RE: So many problems with CFC scopes...)
Benoit, thanks for the summary of your rules-of-thumb for CF modularisation.
I'll check out
But, in some cases CFCs might be more appropriate than UDF to encapsulate
generic logic : when you need to have an object-oriented logic.
Indeed, the advantage of CFCs over UDFs is their ability to have (or
simulate) an 'object-oriented/object-based' behaviour.
For example, CFC are great to
by the old CFC instance.
You have to reload a new instance to get the new definition.
Benoit Hediard
-Message d'origine-
De : S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : lundi 30 septembre 2002 18:23
À : CF-Talk
Objet : RE: UDF Vs CFC (was RE: So many problems with CFC scopes
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 09:23 US/Pacific, S. Isaac Dealey wrote:
Question: (dunno if anyone has the answer to this) Do CFC's share
methods in
memory, or does each new component created have its own instances of
all the
functions defined in the cfc which take up their own space in
subsequent page loads.
As a side note, I tested CFML tag based UDFs vs. CFSCRIPT based UDFs too,
and the CFSCRIPT UDFs executed slightly faster than their tag based
cousins.
-Rob
Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 10:26:29 +0200
From: Benoit Hediard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: UDF Vs CFC (was RE: So many problems
was
substantially faster on initial page load and all subsequent page
loads.
That's good to know - it fits in with my expectations and is exactly
why, if you must do this kind of stuff, I would recommend creating just
a single CFC instance and saving it in server scope (since a 'UDF
library CFC' will have
On Monday, Sep 30, 2002, at 09:23 US/Pacific, S. Isaac
Dealey wrote:
Question: (dunno if anyone has the answer to this) Do
CFC's share
methods in
memory, or does each new component created have its own
instances of
all the
functions defined in the cfc which take up their own
space in
19 matches
Mail list logo
