RE: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Brook Davies
t CFMX6.1 installations were very robust, >there were some that were nothing but problems, and there was a  real >shortage of solutions around. > > > >Looks like that's going to change now, and that's a good thing. > > > >Cheers, > >Michael Kear >

RE: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Mike Kear
good thing. Cheers, Michael Kear Windsor, NSW, Australia AFP Webworks. -Original Message- From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2003 12:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 Mike, I am glad to hear that you have identifi

RE: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Tom Jordahl
PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1 It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit:   After our Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues.   So on Friday

Re: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-03 Thread Calvin Ward
r 02, 2003 6:54 PM   Subject: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1   It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit:   After our   Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought   it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues.   So

Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1

2003-11-02 Thread Mike Kear
It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit:   After our Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues.   So on Friday we stopped the SMTP server and left everything else alone.    Now