t CFMX6.1 installations were very robust,
>there were some that were nothing but problems, and there was a real
>shortage of solutions around.
>
>
>
>Looks like that's going to change now, and that's a good thing.
>
>
>
>Cheers,
>
>Michael Kear
>
good thing.
Cheers,
Michael Kear
Windsor, NSW, Australia
AFP Webworks.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Jordahl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 4 November 2003 12:21 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
Mike,
I am glad to hear that you have identifi
PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit: After our
Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought
it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues. So on
Friday
r 02, 2003 6:54 PM
Subject: Update: Memory Leak on Win2k/CMX6.1
It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit: After our
Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought
it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues. So
It looks as though we might at last have identified the culprit: After our
Sysadmin spent ages searching the forums about stalled servers, we thought
it might be our mail server, since we're also getting mail issues. So on
Friday we stopped the SMTP server and left everything else alone. Now
5 matches
Mail list logo