I got this working.
Always the way just after I post to a list.
Thought I would post what I did to get it working just in case it helps
someone else.
- I uninstalled CF (Deleted the CF11 Dir because the uninstall program
wouldn't launch).
- Created the apache2.conf file ( touch
/Library/Server/W
Does anyone know anywhere with instructions on how to configure CF 11 on OS
X Server (10.9.4)?
The connector scripts don't seem to support the alternate Apache locations
and config files (Server doesn't have an 'apache2.conf' file.)
I've tried to configure it all manual
Thanks Heaps.I never thought I will get such huge respones...
Once thanks ...
Sangeeta
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
gt; >
> > > -----Original Message-
> > > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:43 PM
> > > To: CF-Talk
> > > Subject: Re: Re:Transfer to Mac OS X Server
> > >
> >
or something, but who knows if that's even possible, let alone
> stable.
>
> Cheers,
> barneyb
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:43 PM
> > To: CF-Talk
> > S
From what I understand of my FMP-oriented associates, you're right that
the JDBC and ODBC drivers for FMP suck royally, especially in the
stability department.
Also, I get the impression that if you are going to web publish from FM
Unlimited, you will get better results using CDML than Lasso, b
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Barney Boisvert
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 4:47 PM
Subject: RE: Re:Transfer to Mac OS X Server
A quick Googling indicates that there is a FileMaker JDBC driver, but that
it's not quite up to spec, poorly built, and is only availabl
Filemaker Pro isn't ODBC or JDBC compliant, so I don't know of a way to
directly connect FMP to CF. It's annoying to the point that, while my
shop does both FMP and CF, we try to avoid linking them when possible.
That said, there are some options:
Ideally, you could port the DB to something li
bridge it across
ODBC or something, but who knows if that's even possible, let alone stable.
Cheers,
barneyb
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 1:43 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: Re:Transfer to Mac
ngeeta Karmokar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 2:35 PM
Subject: Re:Transfer to Mac OS X Server
> Urgent help
>
> I am using Filemaker Pro server on mac and trying to connect database to
the coldfusion server
Urgent help
I am using Filemaker Pro server on mac and trying to connect database to the coldfusion server and make websites work. how should i go around that. I have installed JRun/CFMX in /Applications/jrun4 directory.
I really need serious help..
Regards
Sangeeta
[Todays Threads]
[This
Sangeeta ,
I do all my CFMX development on OS X. I really don't see much
difference between running JRun/CFMX on Windows and Mac. I changed the
install directories from "/opt/jrun4" to "/Applications/jrun4" and
"/opt/cfmx" to "/Applications/cfmx". It isn't necessary but to work in
/opt you nee
On Mon, 2004-02-16 at 22:56, Sangeeta Karmokar wrote:
> Can anyone help me Please
>
> Intially I was working on PC so Coldfusion Server was running on
> PC, but now in my office they have shifted PC to Mac OS X.
Congratulations :)
> You
> know in PC how we can save all database in db fold
Can anyone help me Please
Intially I was working on PC so Coldfusion Server was running on PC, but now in my office they have shifted PC to Mac OS X. You know in PC how we can save all database in db folder and cfm pages in WWWroot folder of the server and then later from Admin section we can
> My understanding is that JRun 4 supports some very sophisticated load
> balancing and failover functionality that is partially encapsulated in
the
> connector.
>
That makes perfect sense. I assume this allows the connector to proxy
requests to any JRun instance whether or not it is on the same
On Friday, August 2, 2002, at 01:04 , Dave Watts wrote:
> For the life of me, I can't imagine what this "extra" logic could be
> doing.
My understanding is that JRun 4 supports some very sophisticated load
balancing and failover functionality that is partially encapsulated in the
connector.
"
.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 02, 2002 4:05 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
> Interesting. Yes, I guess so. Well, I don't stand much
> chance of solving the connector problem - we used to
> distribute the c
> Interesting. Yes, I guess so. Well, I don't stand much
> chance of solving the connector problem - we used to
> distribute the connector source because it was a simple
> connector but now it contains a lot of extra logic and
> provides far more than just simple Apache / JRun
> connectivity
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 11:20 , Dave Watts wrote:
> I think being able to use a known, "production-quality" web server is much
> more important than being able to use Verity. You might still be able to
Interesting. Yes, I guess so. Well, I don't stand much chance of solving
the connector
On Friday, August 2, 2002, at 07:52 , Dick Applebaum wrote:
> Have you had any luck Publishing Web services -- navigating the pain,
> er, ah, plain of jars?
*groan* Not yet. I'm talking to the ColdFusion team to see if I can find
out why / how the environment for the stub compiles is different
Sean
Have you had any luck Publishing Web services -- navigating the pain,
er, ah, plain of jars?
Dick
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 10:28 AM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
> I tried a few other combinations of moving .jar files around but I can't
> yet get both consuming and producing to work..
On 8/1/02, Dick Applebaum penned:
>I will challenge you on the development side.
Me too. Anything I do on my Mac gets done much quicker than when I
try and do the same thing on Windows. Just little things, like when I
want to hilite and select a block of text. Click, drag, and when you
get to
Speaking of OS/2.you can now run that on Virtual PC (Mac or Windows)
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
But my OS is better. And Cheaper.
OS/2 WARP WILL NEVER DIE.
Jesse
connection, I no longer need the cable.
There are millions of Mac users out there that don't realize that they
need floppies-- they just keep going on oblivious of their
predicament %^)>
Dick
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Applebaum [
> Good points, but they are still not sturdy enough for
> hi-end client or any type of server environment.
> I know you are a Mac-man and indeed will push it much
> like a Microsoftian :-p but in this case you can go on
> and on about it, and it will still always come down to
> the fact t
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 12:29 PM, Jesse Noller wrote:
> But my OS is better. And Cheaper.
>
> OS/2 WARP WILL NEVER DIE.
>
> Jesse Noller
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Macromedia Server Development
> Unix/Linux "special guy"
>
If CP/M can't do it, it's not worth doing!
Dick
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 11:17 , Neil Robertson-Ravo =TMM= wrote:
> I think price is not really issue at the mo (surely peripherals are so
> cheap that building your own is probably cheaper!?)
Neither I nor my wife can be bothered with that - we want a standard,
vendor-supported machine.
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 11:42 , <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just for argument's sake - in a P4 (2.54Ghz), it is VERY difficult to get
> up
> to $4,300. I spec'ed out what you just said, included a 17" flat screen,
> 80GB HD, etc, and I didn't come up with $4300. Much closer to $3500.
28 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: X-server?
>
> amen to that!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:56 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: X-server?
>
>
> We spend much more for the Solari
amen to that!
-Original Message-
From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:56 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
We spend much more for the Solaris equivalent
-Original Message-
From: Venable, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
I think Apple's X-Serve is a very solid and attractive offer for folks
running in a Solaris environment. Way cheaper.
-Original Message-
From: Neil Robertson-Ravo =TMM= [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday,
August 01, 2002 3:12 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
Hi
:04 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
I thought that the original discussion was about OS-X in
the server world, not the desktop world. Here is a good
comparo, from a Linux site, so it's not pro or anti apple
by nature. It talks about the cost analysis a little bit.
http://www.linuxworld.c
on the data i.e. USE A FLOPPY! They still have their
uses...
-Original Message-
From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 20:01
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: X-server?
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 11:17 AM, Neil Robertson-Ravo =TMM=
wrote:
> I th
also has a link to some bench mark results and some other
good stuff.
Just food for thought.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:42 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
Just for argument's sake - in a P4 (2.54G
Original Message-
> From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 01 August 2002 19:14
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: X-server?
>
> On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 09:46 , <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Apple may be getting more competitive, but I stil
We spend much more for the Solaris equivalent
-Original Message-
From: Venable, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent
ED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 8:38 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
I'll reply in-line
> There are lots of web developers out there (myself included) that
> use Macs.
Yes, client side. Not server side.
> Many develop applications that are hosted by outsid
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 2:14 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: X-server?
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 09:46 , <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apple may be getting more competitive, but I still think an Intel solution
> can be deployed cheaper than an Apple so
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 10:28 AM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
>
> I tried a few other combinations of moving .jar files around but I can't
> yet get both consuming and producing to work... I'll continue to work on
> this today!
>
Yeah, I did that too -- kinda' like playing those bar games wit
ut it has no floppy drive (yes, we still need them!)...
>> I priced up the same configuration on an iMac
I'm intrigued Was it running Windows :-)?
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 19:14
To: CF-Talk
Subject: R
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 09:46 , <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apple may be getting more competitive, but I still think an Intel solution
> can be deployed cheaper than an Apple solution.
I priced up a new high-end Wintel desktop for my wife. A Dell at $4,300
including software and periphe
HHmm those mac portables starting to look much more attractive now...hehe
-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 1:28 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OS X Web Services Running! was Re: X-server?
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 02:19 , Dick Applebaum wrote:
> You do *not* want to copy webservices.jar from the CF runtime/lib to
> /Library/Java/Extensions/ -- it screws up getting the definition of a
> local cfc as a web service, i.e. the following won't work
>
> http://127.0.0.1:8500/c
sic iMac starting at $799 (new, better used) This is
a lot faster, etc than the old iMac I used for the port of CFMX to OS
X -- and it has exactly the same OS, Java, Apache, Perl, yadda, yadda,
yadda
http://www.apple.com/imac/g3/
Dick
>
> -Original Message-
> From:
On Thursday, August 1, 2002, at 05:37 AM, Jesse Noller wrote:
>
>
> I'll reply in-line
Me too!
>
>> There are lots of web developers out there (myself included) that
>> use Macs.
>
> Yes, client side. Not server side.
Yes that is exactly what I an talking about -- there are quite a few
t'll never
have an inroad here without more offerings at less price.
-Original Message-
From: Venable, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 12:22 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
-Original Message-
From: John Paul Ashenfelter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 9:25 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: X-server?
>Plus, once you've spent all the $$ on the X-Server, you don't have cash
left
>for software :)
>From what I've se
le options. I
can't make this
> > statement, because I have never developed on a Win, Solaris or Linux
box.
> >
> > I can give this opinion: CFMX ON Mac OSX is the *Best* Web
> > Application development system, running on the *Best* Operating system
running on the *Best
I'll reply in-line
> There are lots of web developers out there (myself included) that
> use Macs.
Yes, client side. Not server side.
> Many develop applications that are hosted by outside services.
Once again, client vs. server.
> Those who develop in CF develop apps that
t; Someone mentioned HP. Yeah. CF runs on HP. You have no idea how much of
> a nightmare it is to try to test new-gen software on hardware that is
> nearly 6 gens behind.
>
> Remember, we also have to pay upkeep, etc. The problem with niche
> markets, is that while yes, it would give
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 11:02 PM, Jesse Houwing wrote:
> There is even a Coldfusion custom tag set that works with imagemagick
>
> Jesse
>
Excellent!
I always wanted this capability in CF, but could never convince my host
services to install ImageMagick.
And, the tag could probably s
My CFMX on Mac OS X just consumed a web service -- it was quite tasty
Thanks Sean
You do *not* want to copy webservices.jar from the CF runtime/lib to
/Library/Java/Extensions/ -- it screws up getting the definition of a
local cfc as a web service, i.e. the following won't work
http:/
Dick Applebaum wrote:
> You can get most of the function of Verity with a open source package
> called Glimpse -- I think the latest version is available at:
>
> http://webglimpse.org/
>
> It is Perl-based only (AFAIK), but that's no problem as Mac OS X
> includes Perl with every install
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 10:06 , Sean A Corfield wrote:
> Access a web service (e.g., the Amazon one) and lo and behold!!
Here's a simple example (you'll need to sign up for the Amazon developer
program and get your own developer tag to go in this code!):
Amazon Keyword Search
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 04:23 , Dick Applebaum wrote:
> I also put a copy of java2wsdl.jar and wsdl2java.jar in the same folder.
Don't need 'em.
You need tt-bytecode.jar which is part of the axis-1_0 distribution.
Download the "Beta 3" .tar.gz from http://xml.apache.org/axis/index.html
I have had no luck getting CFMX to recognize the class path for
org/w3c/dom/Node
either in the startup shell script or the CFMX administrator JVM
settings.
No doubt, my lack of Java expertise ... I'll do some reading and see if
I can make it worh
I think that it is close, thanks to M
I found it in DWMX, not in CFMX
That changed the error
now it can't find:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: org/w3c/dom/Node
But, I do have that in several places WebObjects and several others.
The most promising looks to be
/System/Library/Frameworks/JavaXML.framework/WebSer
> From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 5:04 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OS X Web Services was Re: X-server?
>
> Thanks Matt
>
> There is no com nor techtrader nor BCEntity
>
> anywhere within the Linux install (either
Thanks Matt
There is no com nor techtrader nor BCEntity
anywhere within the Linux install (either as a filename or in the
content of any file) -- I ported everything across as installed.
Is the above part of the CFMX Linux install?
If not where do I get it?
TIA
Dick
On Wednesday, July 31,
> java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
> com/techtrader/modules/tools/bytecode/BCEntity
Looks like your classpath is still wrong as the above error means that
the JVM can't find the class
com.techtrader.modules.tools.bytecode.BCEntity. You should verify that
that class is in the classpath and/or even
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 02:20 PM, Matt Liotta wrote:
> All of the Web services stuff is in webservices.jar.
>
>
OK, I made webservices.jar accessable to Mac OS X JVM with a quick fix
that works for the jdbc drivers-- putting a copy in
/Library/Java/Extensions *
I also put a copy of ja
sday, July 31, 2002 2:14 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: OS X Web Services was Re: X-server?
>
> On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 01:38 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
>
> > CFMX tries to compile these files but they don't compile. My sense
is
> > that
> > the envi
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 02:14 , Dick Applebaum wrote:
> Could it be that CFMX assumes that Apache, and the required classes, are
> pre-installed (not part of the CFMX install)?
No, it's the Axis code and it's buried somewhere in one of the .jar files
installed with CFMX.
> Would that al
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 01:38 PM, Sean A Corfield wrote:
> CFMX tries to compile these files but they don't compile. My sense is
> that
> the environment that CFMX uses to compile the stubs doesn't have the
> org.apache.* classes in it (I tried to javac the files by hand and it
> couldn'
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 12:16 , Dick Applebaum wrote:
> Can anyone tell me/ point me to what is supposed to happen when you
> invove a web service.
CFMX parses the WSDL and generates Java stub files. These are then
compiled. The result allows CFMX to execute the Web Service (subsequent
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 11:20 AM, Dave Watts wrote:
>
> In fact, I think getting web services working might be a bigger deal,
> in the
> long run.
>
>
I would like to try to get consuming web services working, but I don't
know where to start.
Can anyone tell me/ point me to what is su
> > I think that not being able to integrate with Apache is
> > probably the biggest thing keeping CF MX from being ready
> > for OS X production use.
>
> Not the lack of Verity? ;)
I think being able to use a known, "production-quality" web server is much
more important than being able to use
You can get most of the function of Verity with a open source package
called Glimpse -- I think the latest version is available at:
http://webglimpse.org/
It is Perl-based only (AFAIK), but that's no problem as Mac OS X
includes Perl with every installation
I used glimpse quite a bit
n A Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 10:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: X-server?
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:20 , Ian Lurie wrote:
> I don't know about offensive but it seems like Macromedia may be missing
> an
> opportunity here. The X Server
ler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Macromedia Server Development
Unix/Linux "special guy"
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Lurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:20 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: X-server?
>
> I don't know about offensiv
signs that they do,
> they
> could apply much better pressure to Macromedia to get this done then we
> could, or
> at least help make our case.
>
>
> -Buddy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dick Applebaum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 20
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:20 , Ian Lurie wrote:
> I don't know about offensive but it seems like Macromedia may be missing
> an
> opportunity here. The X Server is a screaming deal - inexpensive, fast and
> easy to work with. If CF MX worked on it it'd be a great n
ECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 7:39 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: X-server?
On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 07:29 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>> wsconfig.jar does not support Apache on OSX - because OSX is
>> not on its list of known operating systems. I haven't had
>> time to f
On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 07:29 , Dave Watts wrote:
> I don't think you can fake it - all it is, really, is a container for
> various binaries. The Apache module in there is written in C for Linux
> x86,
Ah, I hadn't dismembered it but you're probably right.
> if I understand correctly. I th
It's a kick ass piece of hardware...I'm sure they'll take a look at
supporting OSX in due time as the market grows...
-Original Message-
From: Ian Lurie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:20 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
I don't
I don't know about offensive but it seems like Macromedia may be missing an
opportunity here. The X Server is a screaming deal - inexpensive, fast and
easy to work with. If CF MX worked on it it'd be a great niche market that
you-know-who would have a hard time penetrating
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, at 09:10 , Cary Gordon wrote:
> Speaking for myself, I find this really offensive (the idea of paying a
> Macromedia employee, not you Dick). Between my company and our clients,
> we
> give Macromedia enough money to by a room full of Mac boxes.
Perhaps you missed t
rom: Cary Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 12:11 PM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Re: X-server?
>
> Speaking for myself, I find this really offensive (the idea of paying a
> Macromedia employee, not you Dick). Between my company and our clients,
> we
Speaking for myself, I find this really offensive (the idea of paying a
Macromedia employee, not you Dick). Between my company and our clients, we
give Macromedia enough money to by a room full of Mac boxes.
Cary
At 07:38 PM 7/29/2002 -0700, you wrote:
>Well, MM's Unix/Linux "special guy" say
On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 07:29 PM, Dave Watts wrote:
>> wsconfig.jar does not support Apache on OSX - because OSX is
>> not on its list of known operating systems. I haven't had
>> time to figure out how to fake it yet.
>
> I don't think you can fake it - all it is, really, is a container for
> wsconfig.jar does not support Apache on OSX - because OSX is
> not on its list of known operating systems. I haven't had
> time to figure out how to fake it yet.
I don't think you can fake it - all it is, really, is a container for
various binaries. The Apache module in there is written in C
On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 06:22 , Dave Watts wrote:
>> Anyone out there installed CFMX on the new Apple X Server?
> I know a bunch of people who've installed it on their OS X
> desktops/workstations, but I don't think it's ready for production use on
> a
&
y 29, 2002 6:23 PM
>To: CF-Talk
>Subject: RE: X-server?
>
>
> > Anyone out there installed CFMX on the new Apple X Server?
>
>I know a bunch of people who've installed it on their OS X
>desktops/workstations, but I don't think it's ready for production use o
Bummer. What IS a good UNIX config for it...?
-Original Message-
From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 6:23 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: X-server?
> Anyone out there installed CFMX on the new Apple X Server?
I know a bunch of people who've inst
> Anyone out there installed CFMX on the new Apple X Server?
I know a bunch of people who've installed it on their OS X
desktops/workstations, but I don't think it's ready for production use on a
server. The Verity engine doesn't work at all - it's not written in
Anyone out there installed CFMX on the new Apple X Server?
__
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
86 matches
Mail list logo
