RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-30 Thread Nick McClure
I know that, you know that. But most people who are new to CF don't. Also there are a lot of people out there who are still limited to 4.x. Not as much that you can do with the scripting side, and they don't know what else is in the newer versions. At 08:09 AM 10/30/2002 -0800, you wrote: > >

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Rohan
those posting against the php switch however. -Original Message- From: Robert Everland [mailto:REverland@;dixonusa.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 8:09 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP But you can't do that if you want to include files. I think yahoo makes a goo

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-30 Thread Robert Everland
nt: Wednesday, October 30, 2002 11:10 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP if (blah) { }else{ switch () { 1: this; break; 2: that; break; } } -Original Message- From

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-30 Thread Rob Rohan
PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: Yahoo moving to PHP > or <% if (blah) { }else{ switch () { 1: this;

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-30 Thread Stephen Moretti
-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 10:20 PM Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP > There must be more to their choices then the slides reveal. > > They say... > * They didn't go with CF because its syntax is ugly. > * They didn't go with ASP b

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Nick McClure
> or <% if (blah) { }else{ switch () { 1: this; break; 2: that; break;

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Nick McClure
I work on that gets nearly 1million hits a day during the course of the event. http://www.rk3de.org All CF, has been for 5 years. >What is the most high trafficked website/application made with >ColdFusion you guys know? ~| Arc

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Kwang Suh
Prolly half.com > -Original Message- > From: SMR Enterprises [mailto:info@;smrenterprises.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 7:44 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: Re: Yahoo moving to PHP > > > onemodelplace.com is pretty high.. so is ebags.com i believe &g

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Matt Liotta
Message- > From: Alex Hubner [mailto:cftalk@;hubner.us] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:30 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP > > This open good (and old) question: CFMX is gentle to deal with high (I > mean really high) traffic compared to others such as ASP

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Craig Thomas
>>> CF has ugly syntax? Are they on crack? obviously, and compared to php too! ~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread SMR Enterprises
onemodelplace.com is pretty high.. so is ebags.com i believe - Original Message - From: "Alex Hubner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:30 PM Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP > This open good (a

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread S . Isaac Dealey
> This open good (and old) question: CFMX is gentle to deal > with high (I > mean really high) traffic compared to others such as > ASP/PHP > (interpreted) and JSP/etc (compiled) - of course supposing > good coding > practices and good server tuning. People discuss and argue > about it but > there'

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Alex Hubner
This open good (and old) question: CFMX is gentle to deal with high (I mean really high) traffic compared to others such as ASP/PHP (interpreted) and JSP/etc (compiled) - of course supposing good coding practices and good server tuning. People discuss and argue about it but there's no consense. Wh

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Dick Applebaum
On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 02:56 PM, Park, Simon wrote: > Anyone run CF on BSD? Mac OS X FreeBSD with a GUI! Dick > > Simon > >> -Original Message- >> From: Ben Densmore [mailto:ben_densmore@;esupport.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:13 PM >> To: CF-Talk >> Subject: OT:

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Dick Applebaum
digital202.com > E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Work: 206.575.1717 > Cell: 206.351.3948 > > > -Original Message- > From: Everett, Al [mailto:AEverett@;askallied.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:21 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Dick Applebaum
On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 02:21 PM, Everett, Al wrote: > > CF has ugly syntax? Are they on crack? > > Yes, I especially like PHP's elegant syntax for db queries and their ability to cache queries is transparent -- or is that non-existent? Dick ~~

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Paris Lundis
Dave Notik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 14:35:35 -0800 Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP > Maybe they're making reference to the fact that all tags start with > "CF"... which I know turns off a lot of engineers who like to keep > code > ge

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Park, Simon
Anyone run CF on BSD? Simon > -Original Message- > From: Ben Densmore [mailto:ben_densmore@;esupport.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:13 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > > > Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they make > reference as

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Dave Notik
2:21 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP CF has ugly syntax? Are they on crack? > -Original Message- > From: Ben Densmore [mailto:ben_densmore@;esupport.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:13 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > > >

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Paul Giesenhagen
PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:20 PM Subject: RE: Yahoo moving to PHP > There must be more to their choices then the slides reveal. > > They say... > * They didn't go with CF because its syntax is ugly. > * They

Re: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread jon hall
Yeah, I'd disagree with him, but really it's a personal preference. I feel the same way about VB. Somewhere in they said that the guy who was pushing for php was one of the developers of Apache, so he is probably a C guy. PHP and C are very similar... -- jon mailto:jonhall@;ozline.net Tuesday,

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Ryan Kime
Yeah, and they announced last week that they are using Flash Communication Server for their SBC Yahoo DSLgo figure. -Original Message- From: Ben Densmore [mailto:ben_densmore@;esupport.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 4:13 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP Check it

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Matt Liotta
There must be more to their choices then the slides reveal. They say... * They didn't go with CF because its syntax is ugly. * They didn't go with ASP because it requires Windows. * They didn't go with Java because it required threads and FreeBSD doesn't really like threads

RE: Yahoo moving to PHP

2002-10-29 Thread Everett, Al
CF has ugly syntax? Are they on crack? > -Original Message- > From: Ben Densmore [mailto:ben_densmore@;esupport.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 5:13 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: OT:Yahoo moving to PHP > > > Check it out, in their presentation for why they chose PHP, they make > ref