PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput query - best practice
That's not possible.
What if you want to group on a column? Cfloop can't do that, only
cfoutput.
How do you get around that limitation? Because I would maim to be able to
use
: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 4:18 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput query - best practice
That's not possible.
What if you want to group on a column? Cfloop can't do that, only
cfoutput.
How do you get around that limitation? Because I
, 2005 8:24 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfloop vs cfoutput query - best practice
Well you can, but you wouldn't want to. Just do the logic yourself by seeing
if the grouping column has changed, if it has, you've moved onto the next
group.
Ade
-Original Message-
From: Andy Matthews [mailto
Well that's okay then. But I was HOPING you'd tell me you had a way to group
using cfloop darnit!
Well you can do it...but it's not that efficientrole your own code that
keeps track of the LAST loops value of the field you want to group onwhen
LAST value is not equal to current value
First, thanks to all who communicate via cf_talk. I have learned alot about
my trade from all of the contributors. While its a rare occurance, when I
am able to provide insight regarding someone's inquiry, I do so.
My question is, if I need to loop thru a query result set and will be not
Ben Forta ran some tests on this one a while back, and I think it came out
pretty even.
You can probably google it and find his results.
Will
~|
Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking
Here it is:
http://coldfusion.sys-con.com/read/41568.htm
Will
~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble
Ticket application
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48
Message:
I prefer CFLOOP for all my query looping needs (even when I'm
outputting) assuming I don't need the grouping provided by CFOUTPUT.
I don't know if it's more efficient, but I think it makes the code
easier to read.
cheers,
barneyb
On 12/15/05, Charlie Hanlon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First,
IIRC, it doesn't matter anymore in terms of speed with CF6+
As a matter of personal preference, if there's no output I use a loop.
If there *is* output and I am using a loop I make sure I put the
cfoutputs outside the loop, but again I don't believe that makes any
difference unless you are on CF
used to matternot anymore...if ya want the technical details I can fill
them
in for you...I use CFLOOP exclusively
Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
VP Director of E-Commerce Development
Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
phone: 250.480.0642
fax: 250.480.1264
cell: 250.920.8830
e-mail: [EMAIL
x737
--//-
-Original Message-
From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2005 3:59 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput query - best practice
used to matternot anymore...if ya want the technical details I can fill
them
That's not possible.
What if you want to group on a column? Cfloop can't do that, only cfoutput.
How do you get around that limitation? Because I would maim to be able to
use group with cfloop.
Well yes it is possible if you never (at least not in about 5 years) use the
grouping ability of
vs cfoutput query - best practice
First, thanks to all who communicate via cf_talk. I have learned alot about
my trade from all of the contributors. While its a rare occurance, when I
am able to provide insight regarding someone's inquiry, I do so.
My question is, if I need to loop thru
, 2005 5:55 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput mx 6.1 / 7
Can anyone tell me if there is a performance difference in the
following 2 bits of code? I know back in 4.5 cfloop was worse than
cfoutput but now? Any web references to tests on these things welcome!
This is Forta
Can anyone tell me if there is a performance difference in the
following 2 bits of code? I know back in 4.5 cfloop was worse than
cfoutput but now? Any web references to tests on these things welcome!
This is Forta on the subject. It's pre 6.1/7, but I'll bet it's the same.
Can anyone tell me if there is a performance difference in the
following 2 bits of code? I know back in 4.5 cfloop was worse than
cfoutput but now? Any web references to tests on these things welcome!
Thanks.
Duncan
// using cfloop for the query output //
cfquery name=getProducts
select *
Seems to me no-ones 100% sure.
I've found cfloop to execute better overall in most situations when I am
working with very large amounts of data, Chris. I don't generally see much
difference in execution time between the two, in any other situation (and
cfoutput
Sorry for the crosspost (had conflicting answers from other lists)
but is there a consensus on which method of looping over a query
is fastest?
cfloop or cfoutput..
OK, I know you've posted a Winner post, but here's the reasoning behind
why CFOutput is slower than CFLoop
When you run a
Thanks for clearing that up for me
KOla
-Original Message-
From: Philip Arnold - ASP [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 May 2001 12:03
To: CF-Talk
Subject: RE: cfloop vs cfoutput
Sorry for the crosspost (had conflicting answers from other lists)
but is there a consensus on which
Sorry for the crosspost (had conflicting answers from other lists)
but is there a consensus on which method of looping over a query is fastest?
cfloop or cfoutput..
Cheers
KOLa
~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official
ofcourse cfoutput,
that's why it doesn't allow alot of tags to be typed into it.
it's much more faster then CFLOOP, which lets you specify every cf tag you
want (CFMAIL, for example)
Thanks,
Michael Lugassy
IT/WEB Specialist
Interactive Music Ltd.
Bridge Group, LLC
*We Engineer Internet Business Solutions*
TEL: (949) 707-1534 FAX: (949) 707-1535
- Original Message -
From: Kola Oyedeji [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 8:50 AM
Subject: cfloop vs cfoutput
Sorry for the crosspost (had
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:33 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput
No question on that one, CFOUTPUT beats CFLOOP by a long shot, however
sometimes you have to use CFLOOP for things, like if you wish to have a
CFQUERY tag in your CFOUTPUT statement which
: Gregory Harris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 May 2001 17:33
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput
No question on that one, CFOUTPUT beats CFLOOP by a long shot, however
sometimes you have to use CFLOOP for things, like if you wish to have a
CFQUERY tag in your CFOUTPUT statement which
by this.
- Original Message -
From: Michael Lugassy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput
ofcourse cfoutput,
that's why it doesn't allow alot of tags to be typed into it.
it's much more faster then CFLOOP, which
Hello Kola,
This is from the Certified ColdFusion Developer Study Guide:
pg 37 Tip #1
crit_quote
The function of the query loop is the same as using cfoutput with a query attribute.
For
performance reasons, use a Query loop rather than a CFOUTPUT query=qAny loop.
Before
ColdFusion 4.x,
: (949) 707-1534 FAX: (949) 707-1535
- Original Message -
From: Adkins, Randy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 10:08 AM
Subject: RE: cfloop vs cfoutput
You can have a CFQUERY tag between
CFOUTPUT/CFOUTPUT Tags
I have done that many times
- Original Message -
From: Critter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:37 PM
Subject: Re: cfloop vs cfoutput
Hello Kola,
This is from the Certified ColdFusion Developer Study Guide:
pg 37 Tip #1
crit_quote
The function of the query loop is the same
I think that has made it into Hals Helms worst practices list. Learn to use
SQL joins and this is never necessary.
jon
- Original Message -
From: Adkins, Randy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: CF-Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2001 1:08 PM
Subject: RE: cfloop vs cfoutput
You can
29 matches
Mail list logo
