-Original Message-
From: Sean A Corfield [mailto:sean;corfield.org]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 1:10 AM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: cfqueryparam in MX
On Tuesday, Nov 12, 2002, at 08:09 US/Pacific, Zac Spitzer wrote:
does cfqueryparam work with cached queries in MX
Pet peeve: *shared* scopes (Hal Helms defines persistent
as it's still there after you switch the computer off
and I agree with him - scopes are not persistent, databases
and files are persistent!).
The problem with pet peeves is that they're often hard to justify logically.
I have yet to
Also, I wasn't aware that the Session scope is shared.
It isn't. I agree w/ you about the pet peaves thing - and thanks for the
defense - but I was defintely wrong to use 'shared' in this context. I
_have_ heard people refer to the session scope as shared - maybe they
meant between requests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Well, it's good to learn Rick. For further reading on cfqueryparam
| check out Ben Forta's article:
|
| http://www.macromedia.com/desdev/articles/ben_forta_faster.html
|
| Anyway, I would advise anyone working with *any* db
On Tuesday, Nov 12, 2002, at 08:09 US/Pacific, Zac Spitzer wrote:
does cfqueryparam work with cached queries in MX? that is the only
downside of cfqueryparam in Cf 5.0
I believe it is still the case that you cannot combine cfqueryparam
with cachedwithin= on a cfquery (but I'm happy to be
5 matches
Mail list logo
