Victor Moore wrote:
> probably I will go with SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_CI_AS which is
not knowing your data, can't say if this good or bad. test before you leap.
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of
Thanks Paul,
I got 93 results.
probably I will go with SQL_Latin1_General_CP850_CI_AS which is
Latin1-General, case-insensitive, accent-sensitive, kanatype-insensitive,
width-insensitive for Unicode Data, SQL Server Sort Order 42 on Code Page
850 for non-Unicode Data
Regards
Victor
On 8/29/06, P
Victor Moore wrote:
> Sorry, I should have mentioned that the db is MS-SQL Server 2005.
> I thought about Unicode but there is no entry in the drop down with that
> name.
i'm not up to speed on sql 2005 quite yet but try this:
SELECT *
FROM ::fn_helpcollations()
WHERE description LIKE '%unicode%'
Hi Paul,
Sorry, I should have mentioned that the db is MS-SQL Server 2005.
I thought about Unicode but there is no entry in the drop down with that
name.
There are probably one hundred entries so I wasn't sure which one to select
for my case where in the same db I can have multiple languages at t
Victor Moore wrote:
> What is the best collate for a site database that has to support multiple
> languages simultaneously, including double byte: Chinese, Korean, Japanese.
i imagine that depends on the db, but if you're storing what you refer to as
"double byte" data in the same table, then of
Hi,
What is the best collate for a site database that has to support multiple
languages simultaneously, including double byte: Chinese, Korean, Japanese.
Thanks
Victor
~|
Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pa
6 matches
Mail list logo
