but then again much of the Adobe web site is done in JSP:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=39platform=Windows
SIGH!!!
It would be pretty dumb if Adobe rewrote their existing site just to
make CF people feel better. The Adobe site is HUGE. Adobe also has a
lot of
Do I need to grab that session ID manually? I thought I might have to do
that so I have tried to set redirect=false, but I can't get the session ID
returned in the header
You will need to read the cookies and send them on subsequent
requests. The ASP.NET session ID is almost certainly a
as I often tell people, use the best tool for the job, which is not always
CF.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Dave Watts dwa...@figleaf.com wrote:
but then again much of the Adobe web site is done in JSP:
http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=39platform=Windows
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 2:42 PM, kbutte...@yahoo.com kbutte...@yahoo.com
kbutte...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am working on a screen-scraper app, and I have a site that has an
disclaimer front page. You have to click on the I understand button and
then you are redirected to the
Hi,
Just trying to understand this issues, maybe I have missed something
I created a many-to-many relationship in ORM (see below). When I add an account
to a scape i.e. addAccount(account) the second time I add the 'same' account to
the scape I 'should' get an error because of the
Is this being mapped to an already existing database? What are you
ormsettings in application.cfc
And you are right, unless you are mapping to an existing DB where the
realtionships and constraints are already setup, then you would assume that
you can't. However I am guessing you have ORM setup
thanks i have posted in the orm group as suggested and asked for a little more
help understanding what I did wrong.
link here:
http://groups.google.com/group/cf-orm-dev/browse_thread/thread/bb644ecbe4da3214
~|
Order the
This is the Enterprise edition of version 8. When testing the response, I'm
taking the actual header values that go to Google (using LiveHTTPHeaders in
Firefox). That is able to be decoded from the Base 64 encoding using that
SimpleSAML debug page. Details on the Google Dev forum link if you
I am building a demo website to promote a new web template approach for
small business owners to manage their site.
I want them to be able to upload a picture and try out the toolset I provide
them using Coldfusion and various Custom tags
I have purchased through the ages.
My concern is how
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 7:19 PM, Richard Steele wrote:
Yes, that's true, except I'd be concerned about no security patches.
So naturally you Google;s for ColdFusion EOL and found
http://www.adobe.com/support/products/enterprise/eol/eol_matrix.html#63
Adobe is classified as an Enterprise
Cool, yeah I am not saying people here might not know, just that there are
guys over there that don't frequent in here anymore and they do know their
stuff.
Regards,
Andrew Scott
http://www.andyscott.id.au/
-Original Message-
From: Glyn Jackson [mailto:glyn.jack...@newebia.co.uk]
Hi Terry,
I wrote up a blog entry with a few tips on secure file uploads a while
back: http://www.petefreitag.com/item/701.cfm
--
Pete Freitag - Adobe Community Professional
http://foundeo.com/ - ColdFusion Consulting Products
http://petefreitag.com/ - My Blog
http://hackmycf.com - Is your
Hello, I am trying to create layered navigation to improve customer's
experience while shopping/searching for products. Something similar to this.
http://www.magentocommerce.com/knowledge-base/entry/how-does-layered-navigation-work/
Is there any CF enabled or CF Compatible product/solution out
I've got a server (west-intranet, 10.2.1.46) running CF 9.01 on Windows Server
2008 R2 with IIS 7. I previously had multiple instances running, but I had to
change my service properties to a user account so that I could access network
printers, and now everything has gone to heck in a
Hi everyone, I'm stuck on this and it must be so simple but can't get my head
round it.
I have 2 different shopping cart arrays going at the same time because some
products are handled differently to 'normal' products, know it's unusual but
this is how it had to be. I also need to have a 3rd
To add a little more info, I'm able to access all three sites through the
browser on the server console, so CF works fine locally for all three sites.
It's just when I try to access the sites on ports 81 and 82 from the network
that I get the error. Does that mean it's an IIS or IP
Debbie,
Which services did you change accounts on? If you changed CF services to run
under an account then that user account will need permissions to various
folders on the server (like the jrun4 folder for example).
-Mark
Mark A. Kruger, MCSE, CFG
(402) 408-3733 ext 105
www.cfwebtools.com
I have all of my instances running as Windows services, so I changed it on all
4 of those (cfusion, intranet, intranetDev, and wwwDev). All 4 services are
using the same domain account, which is also a member of the local
administrators group. I just double-checked the security on the folders
Debbie,
I'll check but you may need your IIS services to run as the same user as
well. Also, take a look at the *instance*-out.log for any issues when
starting the instance
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: Debbie Morris [mailto:dmor...@sussexcountyde.gov]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10,
We're encountering the following issue with some percentage of IE users
(Definitely but not necessarily limited to IE8 8.0.7601.17514 windows 7).
Basically their SESSION is failing the same way it might if they're cookies
were disabled, however, we are able to set cookies manually using
Hey, we always have room on the BlogCFC team too. ;)
As for WP being so much better than BlogCFC and Mango - I'm sure it
is. Yet oddly - I've been successfully blogging for years (as have
hundreds of Mango and BlogCFC users). Maybe I don't know what I'm
missing, but I'm certainly getting content
As for WP being so much better than BlogCFC and Mango -I'm sure it is.
That depends how you define better. I use both and bog.cfc is way faster
than WP. Page loads with blog.cfc is like flipping channels on the tv.
G!
On Aug 10, 2011 5:47 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey,
We had a client that wants to eventually move their CF web application over to
.NET. In preparation for this, we started writing some of the business layer
in .NET and compiling it into a DLLs. I've figured out how to have CF
communicate with the .NET DLL object and call the functions inside
Which reminds me - most of the speed in BlogCFC came from time spent
using our built in Server Monitor and Debugging output. It's
incredible how useful that is. But that's useful info and probably OT
for this thread. ;)
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Gerald Guido gerald.gu...@gmail.com wrote:
Wordpress does a hell of a lot more than just blogging these days ray.You
can build an entire site with it.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.comwrote:
Hey, we always have room on the BlogCFC team too. ;)
As for WP being so much better than BlogCFC and
you probably have a lot of errors. You really need to turn on the debugging
and have a look, there are often plugins that conflict with each other or
are not compatible with current version and as result you can have tons of
error sin the background.
You also need to make sure you are using
If it is an IIS problem then you need to make sure that the application pool
also has correct permissions, and that the user is a member of the IISURS or
IWAM group (I forget which)
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Mark A. Kruger mkru...@cfwebtools.comwrote:
Debbie,
I'll check but you may
Cool, When I need my blog to do more than blog, I'll look into it. ;)
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Russ Michaels r...@michaels.me.uk wrote:
Wordpress does a hell of a lot more than just blogging these days ray.You
can build an entire site with it.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:46 PM,
Nah, WordPress is just slow. Clicking Dashboard takes up to 5 seconds for me
on the hosted version consistently.
And WordPress does seem to do some pretty intelligent ( though slow as crap
) caching on every change to any of your content, which is worth it to them
and their scale I'm sure but
I should probably clarify that the rest of the web for me is nearly instant
and I have an average ping of about 4 ms. In other words WordPress being
slow is based on repeat observation, not a potential one-off fluctuation.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:16 PM, David McGuigan
So you're talking about the hosted Wordpress service rather than installing
and running Wordpress on your own server...
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:16 PM, David McGuigan davidmcgui...@gmail.comwrote:
Nah, WordPress is just slow. Clicking Dashboard takes up to 5 seconds for
me
on the hosted
Can I just say thanks for at least directing this worn thread down a road
less traveled. I'd much rather be talking about wordpress vs blogcfc than
another sky-is-falling panicfest. :)
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 10,
Very astute observation.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.comwrote:
So you're talking about the hosted Wordpress service rather than installing
and running Wordpress on your own server...
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 7:16 PM, David McGuigan
One problem that I run into is the inability to use some of the more
advanced features on shared hosts...which, unfortunately, a lot of my
smaller clients tend to use. So the CFC based stuff doesn't work because
the tags to invoke them are usually restricted.
Eric
-Original Message-
I am trying to use the FB Like and twitter follow buttons and they have a
HUGE amount of space trailing the buttons. Has anyone used these and, more
importantly, know how to get rid of the space? If I just lower the width
value, it causes the FB test to wrap, but the trailing space is still
Using a host that blocks CFCs is like buying a car that can't go over 10 MPH.
Stop sending these folks your business.
CFCs aren't advanced features. They are a core part of the language.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Eric Roberts
ow...@threeravensconsulting.com wrote:
One problem that I
+100 Such hosting companies are doing a great disservice to the CFML
community. Don't use 'em.
On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Raymond Camden raymondcam...@gmail.comwrote:
Using a host that blocks CFCs is like buying a car that can't go over 10
MPH.
Stop sending these folks your business.
If they are paying me...who am I to complain ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:raymondcam...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2011 12:05 AM
To: cf-talk
Subject: Re: ColdFusion 10 and beyond
Using a host that blocks CFCs is like buying a car that can't go over 10
38 matches
Mail list logo
