Without specifics, I can just suggest trying to download the last version
of CF4em (which is still pretty old) and check out the bbmlparser there.
http://cf4em.com/downloads/
/cf4em/inc/parsebbml.cfm
Unless CF4em is what you inherited... In which case, I¹d suggest NOT doing
that that :-)
On
The last few days, my production webserver has had an issue with Java
unable to create cache files. This is triggered when firing a cfimage
tag, pointing at a graphic file in the filesystem, the purpose of which
is to retrieve the width/height values.
As best I can tell (as this is generally
I hope this saves someone some time and I hope I'm not way late to the
RANK() party:
Let's say you have this table:
column1 - column2
A - 1
A - 2
A - 2
B - 3
B - 4
B - 4
...and you need to write SQL to return the most frequently occurring
column2 for each distinct column1:
A - 2
B - 4
Enter
On Aug 5, 2014 3:35 PM, Byron Mann wrote:
Use a failto in cfmail as it may provide you some detail. If the mail
isn't
making it off the server, it should bounce to the failto.
Multi-recipient email will not generate a bounce or undeliverable message
in CF if the CF spooler can deliver to at
trying to download the last version of CF4em
check out the bbmlparser there.
I decided to spend an evening fully investigating the subject and looked at
all the various BBML code routines in CF, PHP and Perl to see what I could
glean. It looks like just about all the ones I could find have
Multi-recipient email will not generate a bounce or undeliverable message
in CF if the CF spooler can deliver to at least one recipient.
I think the failto address is not used by CF to bounce messages, only to
provide a Return-Path: address in the message header, and the bounce is
generated
trying to download the last version of CF4em
check out the bbmlparser there.
I decided to spend an evening fully investigating the subject and looked at
all the various BBML code routines in CF, PHP and Perl to see what I could
glean. It looks like just about all the ones I could find have
Nice!
I've never heard of Rank()...
On 8/12/2014 4:21 PM, John M Bliss wrote:
I hope this saves someone some time and I hope I'm not way late to the
RANK() party:
Let's say you have this table:
column1 - column2
A - 1
A - 2
A - 2
B - 3
B - 4
B - 4
...and you need to write SQL to
Happy to not be the only one. 18 years in and I just learned about it today
(IIRC). :-)
On Aug 12, 2014 8:49 PM, Rick Faircloth r...@whitestonemedia.com wrote:
Nice!
I've never heard of Rank()...
On 8/12/2014 4:21 PM, John M Bliss wrote:
I hope this saves someone some time and I hope
9 matches
Mail list logo