RE: Coldfusion's execution time relative to C++

This is an assumption but.. Seeing as ColdFusion 7 and 8 compile to java byte code It *should* be in the same ratio ball park. -- Scott Stewart ColdFusion Developer SSTWebworks 4405 Oakshyre Way Raleigh, NC. 27616 (919) 874-6229 (home) (703) 220-2835 (cell) -Original Message- From:

Re: Coldfusion's execution time relative to C++

That would be nice. Does anyone have any benchmarking to hopefully back this up? Any comparison tables for CF 7 8 versus .Net, php, asp, etc... This is an assumption but.. Seeing as ColdFusion 7 and 8 compile to java byte code It *should* be in the same ratio ball park. -- Scott Stewart

Re: Coldfusion's execution time relative to C++

Especially when the hotspot optimiser starts compiling the java bytecode to native code. On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 10:21 PM, Scott Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is an assumption but.. Seeing as ColdFusion 7 and 8 compile to java byte code It *should* be in the same ratio ball park. --

Re: Coldfusion's execution time relative to C++

I think these numbers are out to lunch. There is no way that PHP is 100x slower then ColdFusion and I would question that PHP is 100x slower the C++/Java. I guess I'd have to see how these numbers were generated. The numbers need to be looked at in the context that they were derived. Coming up

RE: Coldfusion's execution time relative to C++

, but it is possible.) It has to be this way because the CF language is different than java. Thanks Mark -Original Message- From: Scott Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2008 10:22 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Coldfusion's execution time relative to C

Re: Coldfusion's execution time relative to C++

I would think you are right on this as well. Is there any benchmarking for CF against other languages? I'm sure someone somewhere must have done this. Assuming it's relatively favorable, I would think this would be something good to have when pitching the CF language for various apps. This