On Monday 20 Jul 2009, Don L wrote:
To me some service contract like delivery of a fix of 8 days is too long.
Probably I'll talk to the OSS's owner to negotiate a deal something
later
Yeah.
At a guess if you pay more, you'll get more :-)
You know what, I strongly believe, any OSS
not suggesting not to make the switch but think twice or better talk
to the key person of the product you intend to switch to and possibly
strike a deal or at least obtain his/her support first otherwise your
conversion/switch would be at the mercy of others.
Anyone switching vendors
Well you're talking about Railo or OpenBD, which is it and what problem are
you having?
Adrian
-Original Message-
From: Don L [mailto:do...@yahoo.com]
Sent: 20 July 2009 03:53
To: cf-talk
Subject: SSOT: open source software
Particularly related to ColdFusion. I understand
Well you're talking about Railo or OpenBD, which is it and what problem
are
you having?
Given the traffic on the mailing lists I would say Railo.
For what it is worth, one could replace OSS and Proprietary software
with small company with large corporation and the argument would read
nearly
Yo Don!
A cool thing about open source is that you can pay random coder(s) to
do what you need. Doesn't have to be the creators-- tho they're
obviously going to be the best.
If you are running a business on the Railo software and need a rapid
and guaranteed response, a support contract is
On Monday 20 Jul 2009, denstar wrote:
If you are running a business on the Railo software and need a rapid
and guaranteed response, a support contract is probably not a bad idea
at all.
And, to be fair, I wouldn't expect and immediate response to a direct email
to, say, Bill gates or any
To me some service contract like delivery of a fix of 8 days is too long.
Probably I'll talk to the OSS's owner to negotiate a deal something later
You know what, I strongly believe, any OSS documentation at a reasonable price,
say, $200 or even a bit higher, would sell like hot cake,
Well you're talking about Railo or OpenBD, which is it and what problem are
you having?
Adrian
Forgive me for not naming names. Converted source code in general is running
fine but compiled java class files deployment generated unexpected bugs, some
has been resolved, don't know what's come
don't know what's come up again... so I would hestitate on production
deployment yet
Forgive me if I am wrong, but are you not working with a bleeding edge
release of beta software?
G?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Don L do...@yahoo.com wrote:
Well you're talking about Railo or OpenBD,
don't know what's come up again... so I would hestitate on production
deployment yet
Forgive me if I am wrong, but are you not working with a bleeding edge
release of beta software?
G?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 11:57 AM, D
ahe, it's kind of chick/egg thing. There's a bit of contradition here.
I think you misunderstood. Railo *server* is recommended for production use,
as opposed to the express version.
The current stable release is 3.0.3.000
G
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Don L do...@yahoo.com wrote:
don't know what's come up again... so I would hestitate on production
I think you misunderstood. Railo *server* is recommended for production use,
as opposed to the express version.
The current stable release is 3.0.3.000
G
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 12:14 PM, D
Probably you're right. The first time I came across it, I understood it the
way you did but weird,
12 matches
Mail list logo
