Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On Wed, 23 Aug 2023 at 05:46, Noah Misch via cfarm-users wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 07:39:08PM -0700, Daniel B. Widdis via cfarm-users > wrote: > > Any chance of getting git installed? > > > > $ rpm -qa | grep git > > git-core-2.38.3-1.ppc > > git-2.38.3-1.ppc > >

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On Tue, Aug 22, 2023 at 07:39:08PM -0700, Daniel B. Widdis via cfarm-users wrote: > Any chance of getting git installed? > > $ rpm -qa | grep git > git-core-2.38.3-1.ppc > git-2.38.3-1.ppc > git-core-doc-2.38.3-1.noarch > $ git init > ksh: git: not found. It's at /opt/freeware/bin/git

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

> I believe that all additional Open Source packages that had been requested in recent years have been installed. May depend on how you define "recent". Any chance of getting git installed? $ rpm -qa | grep git git-core-2.38.3-1.ppc git-2.38.3-1.ppc git-core-doc-2.38.3-1.noarch $ git init ksh:

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

cfarm-users Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 12:24 AM To: GCC Compile Farm Users Cc: Sean McGovern Subject: Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119 Does OSUOSL possibly have an NTP server that can be used for the CF machines hosted there? Sean McGovern On Sun, Aug 20, 2023, 18:07 David Edelso

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

rn via cfarm-users Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 12:24 AM To: GCC Compile Farm Users Cc: Sean McGovern Subject: Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119 Does OSUOSL possibly have an NTP server that can be used for the CF machines hosted there? Sean McGovern On Sun, Aug 20, 2023, 18:07

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Jonathan Wakely writes: >If you have this problem with a tarball It's not tar, see my other post, it's assorted broken archive formats some dating back to MSDOS. I suggested the 'make touch' solution because it pretty much works no matter where the breakage lies. Peter.

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On Mon, 21 Aug 2023, 03:20 Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users, < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Bruno Haible via cfarm-users writes: > > >Because in the current state, it means that after creating a tarball of > any > >package that uses a 'configure' script, I need to wait 42 minutes

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On 8/20/23 22:25, Peter Gutmann wrote: It's not buggy, it's just a poorly-designed archive format. Why not use tar? Or, if for some reason you must use an archive format that is sensitive to time zone, why not set TZ when extracting? That would be simpler than fiddling with file timestamps

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Peter Gutmann wrote: > the 'make touch' workaround, which conveniently also gets around wrong-system- > time problems, time-zone-set-wrong problems, ... Your 'make touch' workaround does not work for packages that contain some *.m4 files, an aclocal.m4 file, a configure file, and a config.h.in

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Bruno Haible writes: >If time zones do matter, either your packing program or your unpacking >program is buggy. It's not buggy, it's just a poorly-designed archive format. That's why I used the 'make touch' workaround, which conveniently also gets around wrong-system- time problems,

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Peter Gutmann wrote: > If you bundle something up on a system that's (say) 12 hours ahead of the > target system and unpack it there, many of the files will have dates up to 12 > hours in the future, messing up the build process. So time zones do matter. If time zones do matter, either your

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On 8/20/23 21:56, Peter Gutmann wrote: If you bundle something up on a system that's (say) 12 hours ahead of the target system and unpack it there, many of the files will have dates up to 12 hours in the future Not if "12 hours ahead" merely means a time zone difference. Tarball timestamps

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Paul Eggert writes: >On 8/20/23 21:19, Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users wrote: >> As someone in a time zone 12-24 hours ahead of most of the systems I use > >? Time zone shouldn't matter. If you bundle something up on a system that's (say) 12 hours ahead of the target system and unpack it there,

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

On 8/20/23 21:19, Peter Gutmann via cfarm-users wrote: As someone in a time zone 12-24 hours ahead of most of the systems I use ? Time zone shouldn't matter. I run into problems with cfarm clock skew all the time, and it's never the time zone. ___

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Bruno Haible via cfarm-users writes: >Because in the current state, it means that after creating a tarball of any >package that uses a 'configure' script, I need to wait 42 minutes until I can >build it. As someone in a time zone 12-24 hours ahead of most of the systems I use I run into this

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Does OSUOSL possibly have an NTP server that can be used for the CF machines hosted there? Sean McGovern On Sun, Aug 20, 2023, 18:07 David Edelsohn via cfarm-users < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > I have adjusted the time on gcc119 so that it is fairly close, but I agree > that it

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

I have adjusted the time on gcc119 so that it is fairly close, but I agree that it should be using NTP for time synchronization. Thanks, David On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 7:35 AM Bruno Haible via cfarm-users < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Michael Felt wrote: > > Migration complete.

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Michael Felt wrote: > Migration complete. Thanks! The system clock of this machine is 42 minutes backwards: $ LC_ALL=C TZ=UTC date ; ssh gcc119.fsffrance.org TZ=UTC date Fri Aug 18 11:27:41 UTC 2023 Fri Aug 18 10:45:40 UTC 2023 Could this be fixed, please? Because in the current state, it means

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

All AIX Open Source Toolbox applications were refreshed and are current. I believe that all additional Open Source packages that had been requested in recent years have been installed. Thanks, David On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:47 AM Michael Felt via cfarm-users <

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

FYI, the SSH key changed with the system migration. David On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 6:47 AM Michael Felt via cfarm-users < cfarm-users@lists.tetaneutral.net> wrote: > Migration complete. > > > > > > Michael Felt > > > > > *Mobile +31 (0)6 5184 4181* > > *Email* aixto...@felt.demon.nl > > > > >

Re: [cfarm-users] Migration of gcc119

Migration complete. Michael Felt Mobile +31 (0)6 5184 4181 Email aixto...@felt.demon.nl From: cfarm-users On Behalf Of Michael Felt via cfarm-users Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2023 5:35 PM To: GCC Compile Farm Users Cc: Michael Felt