Goober is good.
Real good :)
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/programadobe/index.html
is the closest yet to a decent Flex 2 tome. Forthcoming like all good
things.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
I have gone with this for now
onchange=if (this.options[this.selectedIndex].value == 0 ) if (
!confirm('delete this')) this.value='#RS_ID#';
where RS_ID is what is being used to select the correct option in the first
place.
But it means if the select another option, then the first option
Back into the CFMAIL issues again
I have debugging some code, trying to find out why when I run a bulk mail
process the memory get sucked up by the cf server. I just did an
interesting test just to see what would happen.
Basically this is the process. All this happens from flash using
Peter,
I hope to run in to you one day.
Thanks for posting crap to my blog, I think this is revenge for me asking a
flash remoting question.
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://dale.fraser.id.au
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Peter
It's just Flash 8 - CF7.
I'm thinking it's simple, searching through lots of examples to find an
example.
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://dale.fraser.id.au
_
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shane Farmer
Sent: Thursday, 16 November 2006 7:41
So what have you got so far? Have you got the Flash app talking to the web
service?
On 11/16/06, Dale Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's just Flash 8 - CF7.
I'm thinking it's simple, searching through lots of examples to find an
example.
Regards
Dale Fraser
If you didn't want to use an onload method of persisting this
information, you could merely store the last selectedIndex against the
DOM element itself.. It just depends on how the initial default value
is being set (via DOM or part of the static HTML). That way, you can
just set the
Worked it out, changed the remoting_sample.myCfc to just myCFC, makes sense.
Thanks Steve, nice and simple.
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://dale.fraser.id.au
_
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Dale Fraser
Sent: Thursday, 16 November 2006 9:34
It should have unpacked into its own directory so that should have worked
unless you put everything into the root of the domain, in which case yes,
you would have had to make that change
The advantage of doing it the way my example shows is that you can use the
same result handler and service
Yep,
Good stuff had to change the CFC to return an array, as the flash object was
trying to display an array but it was returning a string, got it to
successfully return and display the array.
Thanks heaps, I might try to post the result and let everyone see how their
brain is performing.
heres my attempt at a solution.
hth
Pat
script
window.onload = function()
{
alert('running')
var oSelect = document.getElementById(mySelect);
oSelect.onchange = myChangeFn;
oSelect.onclick = myFocusFn;
}
thanks for you suggestions guys.
I was thinking that perhaps the would be an equivalent of an input's
defaultValue for select.
How does the input type=reset work?
On 11/16/06, Dale Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep,
Good stuff had to change the CFC to return an array, as the flash
Hi guys,
I think I'm getting a corrupt application scope problem.
The CF error is:
The element at position 3 cannot be found. LINE 411
LINE 411 is:
#application.rews.timePeriods[X].name# (it's in a loop so X would have
been equal to 3).
Application.cfm code:
Have any of you guys successfully implemented session management in CF using
Remoting?
Regards,
Bjorn Schultheiss
Senior Flash Developer
QDC Technologies
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Shane Farmer
Sent: Thursday, 16 November 2006 8:28 PM
To:
So what scope would you use?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL
A database.
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://dale.fraser.id.au
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Matthew
Sent: Friday, 17 November 2006 15:41 PM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Application scope problem
So what scope would
Hi,
The application scope is useful for this kind of data (in moderation of
course), but you should also minimise the number of writes you actually do
to the application scope.
Hopefully (though the code does not indicate this), you should have a check
to see if the array doesn't already exist
stupidity. it was the only domain reg'd with directNic.com and their
reminder alerts never got to me :(
I usually reg domains with clickngo.com.au but this one for some reason went
the other way (cant remember why at the time).
Now some punk is parking on it and doing squat with it :(
On
Just some things I would like to point out (I know I am always running under
my own steam round here..)
1. A normal variables scope cannot be accessed via custom tags without using
the caller scope and that can get complicated with nested tags. Using the
request scope is a matter of global search
Hey Guys,
Does anyone know if Flash Remoting has changed in the way that we
connect to coldfusion. I had this working correctly on the early
version by commenting out the revevant sections in the
gateway-config.xml.
Now it just comes back with a blank screen. I'm using the basic example
that
Hey Guys,
Does anyone know if Flash Remoting has changed in the way that we
connect to coldfusion. I had this working correctly on the early
version by commenting out the revevant sections in the
gateway-config.xml.
Now it just comes back with a blank screen. I'm using the basic example
that
just to support Joel's argument, why not set it to an applicaiton scoped CFC?
or better still add it to a CFC and decorate an application-scopoed CFC with it?
I've just read this article
(http://www.adobe.com/devnet/server_archive/articles/cf_locking_best_practices.html)
on locking read/write
I'm now using it on 7.02 and it's working fine, but didn't try previously so
not sure if it changed.
Regards
Dale Fraser
http://dale.fraser.id.au
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of cfgroupie
Sent: Thursday, 16 November 2006
23 matches
Mail list logo
