Well the confusion is simply that I offered specific links that work. Could
you please offer the URL that does not? :-)
And if perhaps you're referring to links within the downloaded file itself,
same thing: what URL is being viewed? Could it perhaps be that the relative
URL built doesn't work
Hi All,
We're in the process of preparing for the CF, Tomcat, IIS7 stack for
our intranet. We have followed numerous blog postings around the
electric interwebnet and they have helped to a degree, however ...
Currently we have multiserver CF, JRun, IIS6.
And this is how this looks ...
JRun/CF
To ask a stupid question - how come you are doing this?
Mark
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:28 PM, nkosi glenrainb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
We're in the process of preparing for the CF, Tomcat, IIS7 stack for
our intranet. We have followed numerous blog postings around the
electric
The only stupid question is the one left unasked ... hehe, never
thought I'd say that.
You mean how come we're trying to achieve this configuration?
Well it's a nice level of separation from site code and web
application server ... isn't it?
Also, since it was possible with JRun then it would be
No such thing as a stupid question, only stupid answers :)
-Original Message-
From: nkosi [mailto:glenrainb...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2011 1:49 PM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: ColdFusion, Tomcat, IIS7 question
The only stupid question is the one left unasked ...
Yeah - but what is the end goal? Why bother changing if JRUN is meeting your
needs?
Mark
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 1:49 PM, nkosi glenrainb...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, since it was possible with JRun then it would be nice to
continue this configuration with Tomcat.
--
E: mark.man...@gmail.com
I personally find that CF on Tomcat uses less resources than CF on JRun. Very
generally spoken though.
K
To ask a stupid question - how come you are doing this?
Mark
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To post to this
Fair enough - but spending 2/3 days of dev/sysadmin time doing some resource
savings vs buying some new ram, doesn't seem like good ROI to me, unless
there is a specific goal. (Or you have a LOT of servers)
But hey - don't let me stop you, just figured it was worth asking the
question.
Mark
On
Oh, that's just my personal experience. No idea if that's nkosi's reason behind
it :-)
Fair enough - but spending 2/3 days of dev/sysadmin time doing some resource
savings vs buying some new ram, doesn't seem like good ROI to me, unless
there is a specific goal. (Or you have a LOT of
Does anyone know if there is a JavaScript equivelant to the coldfusion
HASH() function?
Steve
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send
hash by default is MD5 as long as you are using md5 then:
http://pajhome.org.uk/crypt/md5/
Works well.
Paul
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
Does anyone know if there is a JavaScript equivelant to the coldfusion
HASH() function?
** **
Ah - I see, how come we trying to do this if it is already doing the
job. If it ain't broke etc ...
Coz all the cool kids are doing it ... um, no, seriously though ...
Given that CF10 is reportedly dropping JRun for Tomcat and we have
resources available to us right now we thought we would
I'd be pretty shocked if Adobe doesn't make configuring CF10 + Tomcat a
whole lot easier than doing all the steps for CF9 + Tomcat.
So you may be wasting your time. Also, CF9 isn't supported on Tomcat, so you
may be voiding any support contracts you may have.
But hey - if you're having fun :)
Actually wrong one. Was meant to ask about cfusion_encrypt()
From: Paul Kukiel [mailto:kuki...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2011 2:39 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] JavaScript equivelant to HASH function
hash by default is MD5 as long as you are using md5
Basically i need something that i can use to encode/decode the same way in
both cfml and javascript
Any ideas?
From: Paul Kukiel [mailto:kuki...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2011 2:39 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] JavaScript equivelant to HASH function
bcrypt is pretty good, but the main problem with any decent encryption
in js is as usual IE which is slow and good encryption needs to be
complex... wouldn't using SSL suffice?
http://code.google.com/p/javascript-bcrypt/
On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Steve Onnis st...@cfcentral.com.au wrote:
Yes - that is what I thought too.
But like I said, we have the [limited] resources to explore this
option - if it is easy then brilliant, if it gets too complicated then
we should probably wait and hope that Adobe does indeed make the CF
+Tomcat config a whole lot easier.
So now we've got all
I am passing some JSON strings around which i want to just encode and decode
elsewhere
-Original Message-
From: Zac Spitzer [mailto:zac.spit...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, 4 August 2011 2:55 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [cfaussie] JavaScript equivelant to HASH function
On Aug 4, 1:28 pm, nkosi glenrainb...@gmail.com wrote:
We have set up 'multiserver' Tomcat but we cannot figure out how we
can get our CF sites to run without requiring WEB-INF [and CFIDE] in
the root of our sites. This basically means our CF Admin is browsable
via our web site which is not
19 matches
Mail list logo
