On Sep 26, 10:55 am, Phil Haeusler philhaeus...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can pass back some feedback then Mark, without the prospect
(however remote) of winning something, the quality of the survey plus
the cameo by the marquee tag meant i gave up on it.
Especially loved the MARQUEE -- had to
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:09 PM, Dave dave1...@gmail.com wrote:
What are people who are doing this using for var scoping of code?
Given that you can declare the var at the point of first use now, it's
a lot easier to get it right:
var n = arraylen(foo);
for ( var i = 1; i = n; ++i ) { ... }
for
I've noticed on a few of the CF Groups, people are posing all cfScript
code, eg, all Property, Component and Function tags now written in
script.
What are people who are doing this using for var scoping of code?
Mike's varscoper won't work with this sort of code.
Dave
--
You received this
At least that survey _includes_ ColdFusion Builder - the recent Adobe
Customer Engagement survey did not list CFBuilder at all!!!
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Mark Mandel mark.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, don't ask me... :P
Bloody ridiculous.
Mark
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:44 AM,
How awesome is this for formatting? Could it get any worse?
-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/
skype. gb.daemon
twitter. @modius
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
cfaussie group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
Saw your post on stack over flow too http://bit.ly/qBVajq :)
We've got a different var scoper, it doesn't scan code, instead it works at
runtime to count the variables and decide if the variables scope has grown when
a cffunction is run.
I haven't tried it, but I suspect this approach would
I'm interested in your approach. Given that variables scope is object-
scoped, do you have a method such as getCountVars in each class,
then iterate over your singletons, asking each one for how many vars
it has?
Got any code to share?
On Oct 4, 12:01 pm, MrBuzzy mrbu...@gmail.com wrote:
Saw
Sean,
Agreed it's much easier and I'm quite liking to new var-declaring
rules.
I'm kind of surprised that Adode hasn't come up with a solution (built
into the compiler), given that the consequences for getting it wrong
are so grave and they have put a lot of time and effort into making
cfscript
Can't share the code sorry. It's nothing too magical.
We use a custom tag, with a start and end tag.
The tag wraps the body of the cf function. The tag test the length of the
variables scope at the start and end of the tag. I probably shouldn't be
recommending it. It's probably an
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:22 PM, MrBuzzy mrbu...@gmail.com wrote:
We use a custom tag, with a start and end tag.
Might be hard to run a custom tag in cfscript... :)
--
Sean A Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN
An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/
World Singles, LLC. -- http://worldsingles.com/
Sean should be able to whip up
some clojure code that does it in a flash :)
Sent from my mobile
On 04/10/2011, at 12:56 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:22 PM, MrBuzzy mrbu...@gmail.com wrote:
We use a custom tag, with a start and end tag.
Might be
Yeah, what he said ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On 04/10/2011, at 12:59 PM, Andrew Myers am2...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean should be able to whip up
some clojure code that does it in a flash :)
Sent from my mobile
On 04/10/2011, at 12:56 PM, Sean Corfield seancorfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon,
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Andrew Myers am2...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean should be able to whip up
some clojure code that does it in a flash :)
Heh, one of the reasons I like Clojure is that it's thread safe by
design since data is immutable by default and any mutability is
managed thru STM
13 matches
Mail list logo
