Andrew there is a new post on Adobe CF blog tho no new information to add
on what was discussed before:
http://blogs.coldfusion.com/post.cfm/java-7-support-for-coldfusion
Regards, Carl.
On Tuesday, April 3, 2012 9:39:38 AM UTC+10, Andrew Myers wrote:
Thanks Carl. That answers my questions!
Yeah, I think Rakshith's post can be read as: there will be a CF 9.0.3 and a CF
10.0.1 (or whatever numbering will be chosen) that updates your CF
installations to Java 7.
Fun times, will bring another round of new JVM behaviour :) - but solve the
Java 6 EOL issues nicely.
Andrew there is a
I know Carl has been running CF on Java 7 and so have I. I've had a
personal server ( linux ) running 7 since release and haven't seen any
issues.
1.7.0_03 is working fine on my local copy of 9 in windows aswell.
I'm sure the jvm gurus will be able to take advantage of some of the new
It will be interesting to see if CF10 Server Update Updates will manage
the Java 6 to Java 7 change.
Indeed there are some JVM garbage collector changes to experiment with -
Garbage First (G1), G1 being experimental option in some Java 6 and release
in Java 7
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012
Yup - we experimented with G1 in an earlier version of Java 6 and CF 8/9 and
even though it was awesome conceptually, the JVM died multiple times per day
during high load :-)
But I expect that to be much better in Java 7 now.
Cheers
Kai
Indeed there are some JVM garbage collector changes
Seen good 200 day + uptimes and no GC pause effect with G1 so long as allow
sufficient RAM to heap.
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 17:13:21 UTC+10, Kai Koenig wrote:
Yup - we experimented with G1 in an earlier version of Java 6 and CF 8/9
and even though it was awesome conceptually, the JVM died
Thanks for sharing Carl.
FWIW I have also had cf 9.0.1 running in test on Java 7 (deployed on jboss).
No issues observed thus far
Sent from my mobile
On 25/07/2012, at 4:43 PM, Carl ca...@tassweb.com.au wrote:
Andrew there is a new post on Adobe CF blog tho no new information to add on
I thought not but was worth asking!
Thanks
B)
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Chris Velevitch chris.velevi...@gmail.com
wrote:
Sorry, no.
Chris
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Brett Payne-Rhodes bret...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Chris,
I don't suppose this will be recorded or
That raises a couple of interesting points (about a possible 9.0.3).
First, would such an updater work equally well for someone on 9.0 or 9.0.1
(which have Verity) as for someone on 9.0.2 (which does not have Verity)?
Of course, they will have to make it do so.
Second, this begs a question: for
Yeah, I'm pretty sure it's much more stable now. When I trialled it, it was one
of the first G1 builds in Java 6.
Seen good 200 day + uptimes and no GC pause effect with G1 so long as allow
sufficient RAM to heap.
On Wednesday, 25 July 2012 17:13:21 UTC+10, Kai Koenig wrote:
Yup - we
10 matches
Mail list logo
