cfgroupie wrote:
I'm looking at frameworks in my spare timehahahaha...gezz I'm a
nerd. Anyway, I have been looking at a few of them; including (wait for
it) .NET well how it sorta does this.
I got most of them working bar cfwheels...that just pissed me off. What
are other people out
If you are going to get into ORM's - also take a peek at
Transfer (mine) - http://www.compoundtheory.com/transfer/
ObjectBreeze - http://www.objectbreeze.com/
(Yeah I know, blatant plug... so sue me :o) )
Mark
On 7/13/06, Barry Beattie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jeremy
as you know,
We're using Mach-II, Coldspring and Reactor in combination. If I was
coming to the whole scene without previous experience I'd be tempted
to swap out Mach-II for Model-Glue for the reasons Greg states.
Trying to dive into using all 3 in one hit is probably a bit
challenging. Maybe start with an
development.
Regards
Dale Fraser
-Original Message-
From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of cfgroupie
Sent: Friday, 14 July 2006 08:15 AM
To: cfaussie
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: SOT: Frameworks - cfsick
Hey,
See this is my point. everyone reckons one
if CF8 has some extra OO stuff (which it should) then you might regret using
a framework at all. But even with the current model, you can do proper cfc
development.
Huh?
You mean better OO stuff like Java has? A lot of J2EE development is
still done using frameworks, so I don't think the
@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dale Fraser
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 10:51 AM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: SOT: Frameworks - cfsick
One good OO approach that will only get better and stay forever
cfc's
There is nothing stopping you writing
Hi Jeremy
as you know, the last place of employ, we put together the cfdodgy
framework which was dead simple and the guys are still using it (I
think)
lately I've been getting some runs on the board with Reactor (download
the files and checkout this easy to use tuitorial:
