[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-05 Thread Andrew Scott
/table /cfoutput Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au/blog _ From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taco Fleur Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2007 3:22 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset Hi

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-05 Thread Dale Fraser
] On Behalf Of Taco Fleur Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2007 3:22 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset Hi Seona, that is it! Thanks. * count * count + divisor * count + (divisor * 2) On 4/5/07, Seona Bellamy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 05/04/07

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-05 Thread Steve Onnis
Steve Onnis From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andrew Scott Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2007 6:12 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset Yes they are very quick and it wouldn't make any

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-04 Thread Dale Fraser
So are you saying a fixed number of rows 6 Or a fixed number of columns 3? Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au/blog _ From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taco Fleur Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2007 2:33 PM To:

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-04 Thread Seona Bellamy
On 05/04/07, Dale Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So are you saying a fixed number of rows 6 Or a fixed number of columns 3? I believe the line in the original email was: I need to output a recordset in a table, infinite rows, and maximum 3 columns in width. I'm more interested in

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-04 Thread Taco Fleur
That would be, but trying to get a point across. 1 - 7 - 13 2 - 8 - 14 3 - 9 - 15 4 - 10 - 16 5 - 11 - 17 6 - 12 - [] On 4/5/07, Steve Onnis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: wouldnt that be 1 - 6 - 11 2 - 7 - 12 3 - 8 - 13 4 - 9 - 14 5 - 10 - 15 ? --

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-04 Thread Steve Onnis
wouldnt that be 1 - 6 - 11 2 - 7 - 12 3 - 8 - 13 4 - 9 - 14 5 - 10 - 15 ? _ From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Taco Fleur Sent: Thursday, 5 April 2007 2:33 PM To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] outputting recordset Hi all, I

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-04 Thread Andrew Scott
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset fixed number of columns, i.e. 3 On 4/5/07, Dale Fraser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So are you saying a fixed number of rows 6 Or a fixed number of columns 3? Regards Dale Fraser http://dale.fraser.id.au/blog

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-04 Thread Taco Fleur
this is what I currently have, which is not what I am after as it produces 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 etc variables.column = 3; variables.row = ceiling( rsSubCategory.recordCount / variables.column ); table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=0 id=category caption

[cfaussie] Re: outputting recordset

2007-04-04 Thread Pete
this should helpremember a query can be treated as an array, so you'll be able to substitute your code into this without too many problems. !--- setup some data --- cfset a=arraynew(1) / cfloop index=i from=1 to=17 cfset a[i] = i / /cfloop !--- determine bounds --- cfset